Method and computer system for conducting a progressive,...

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Finance

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S026640, C705S027200

Reexamination Certificate

active

07133841

ABSTRACT:
A method and computer system for conducting a progressive, price-driven combinatorial auction wherein equilibrium prices supporting optimal allocation are provided. The auction mechanism allows bids on bundles and uses an innovative price setting mechanism that ensures that the bundle prices reported by the auction have the property that each participant's or bidder's tentative allocation maximizes the value reported in the participant's bid. The auction is progressive, and requires that a participant's new bid improves his previous bid in a precisely defined manner. The auction terminates when no participant submits a new bid, or according to some other specified criterion.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4799156 (1989-01-01), Shavit et al.
patent: 5890118 (1999-03-01), Kagoshima et al.
patent: 5905975 (1999-05-01), Ausubel
patent: 6012045 (2000-01-01), Barzilai et al.
patent: 6101484 (2000-08-01), Halbert et al.
patent: 6272473 (2001-08-01), Sandholm
patent: 2002/0046037 (2002-04-01), Ausubel et al.
patent: 0 828 223 (1998-03-01), None
Clarke, Edward H., Multipart Pricing of Public Goods, Public Choice, 1971, pp. 17-33.
Ledyard, John O., et al., Experiments Testing Multiobject Allocation Mechanisms, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, vol. 6, No. 3, 1997, pp. 639-675.
Rothkopf, Michael H., et al., Computationally Manageable Combinatorial Auctions, DIMACS Technical Report 95-09, Apr. 1995, Rutgers University.
Groves, Theodore, Incentives in Teams, Econometrica, vol. 41, No. 4, Jul. 1973, pp. 617-630.
Kelso, Jr., Alexander S., et al., Job Matching, Coalition Formation, and Gross Substitutes, Econometrica, vol. 50, No. 6, Nov. 1982, pp. 1483-1503.
Banks, Jeffrey S., et al., Allocating Uncertain and Unresponsive Resources: an Experimental Approach, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 20, No. 1, 1989, pp. 1-25.
Parkes, David C., iBundle: An Efficient Ascending Price Bundle Auction, 1999, pp. 1-10.
Parkes, David C., et al., Accounting for Cognitive Coats in On-Line Auction Design, 1998, pp. 1-14.
McAfee, R. Preston, et al., Analyzing the Airwaves Auction, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 10, No. 1, 1996, pp. 159-175.
Demartini, Christine, et al., A New and Improved Design For Multi-Object Interactive Auctions, Mar. 15, 1999, pp. 1-43.
McMillan, John, Selling Spectrum Rights, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, No. 3, 1994, pp. 145-162.
Vickrey, William, Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders, Journal of Finance, vol. 16, 1961, pp. 8-37.
Bikhchandani, Sushil, et al., Competitive Equilibrium in an Exchange Economy With Indivisibilities, Journal of Economic Theory, 1997, vol. 74, pp. 285-413.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and computer system for conducting a progressive,... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and computer system for conducting a progressive,..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and computer system for conducting a progressive,... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3632560

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.