Pulse or digital communications – Equalizers – Automatic
Reexamination Certificate
2000-03-22
2004-07-06
Phu, Phoung (Department: 2631)
Pulse or digital communications
Equalizers
Automatic
C375S231000, C708S323000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06760371
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to communication signal equalizers and, more particularly, to zero forcing equalizers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The need to efficiently and reliably transmit and receive data at high speeds or data rates has long been known. In particular, there is a known need for multi-gigabit per second satellite links with bandwidth efficiencies of three bits per second per Hertz or greater at acceptable bit error rates. Unfortunately, there have been significant problems which have hindered the use of very high data transmission rates, including problems caused by channel distortions. In the past, equalization has been used to compensate for channel distortions introduced by band limiting atmospheric conditions and general non-ideal filtering, all of which cause intersymbol interference.
A transversal filter, e.g., a tapped delay line or nonrecursive equalizer, is one common type of equalizer which has been used to perform equalization in high data rate transmission systems. A transversal filter can be described as a tapped delay line where the output of each of a set of taps is passed through a gain, which may be adjustable, and is then summed with the other tap outputs to produce an equalized signal. In a zero forcing equalizer (ZFE), the gain of each tap output is adaptively determined by a zero forcing algorithm. In such a system, the current and time delayed values of a received signal are linearly weighted by equalizer coefficients (tap weights or gains) with the equalizer coefficients being chosen to force the signal at a feedback point (e.g., the output of the equalizer) to zero at all times other than the sampling time associated with the main path signal. At the sampling time associated with the main path signal, upon which decoding takes place, the output of the equalizer is forced to a normalized one.
FIG. 1
illustrates a known prior art transmission system, having a receiver/demodulator/decoder which uses a ZFE. In this system, a transmitter
10
converts a digital signal to, for example, symbols, modulates the symbols onto a carrier signal, using for example, a quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) technique or any other digital modulation technique such as PSK, QPSK, etc., and transmits the modulated carrier signal through a channel
12
to a receiver/tapped delay equalizer
14
. The tapped delay equalizer
14
uses tap weights to equalize the received signal and the equalized signal is then communicated to a demodulator
16
which converts the signal to baseband. An analog-to-digital (A/D) converter
18
converts the output of the demodulator
16
to a digital signal and, in most cases, separately converts the in-phase and quadrature components of the output of the demodulator
16
to digital signals. The output(s) of the A/D converter
18
are then communicated to a decision unit
20
which decodes the received symbols. In addition, the baseband signal from the demodulator
16
is communicated to a high resolution A/D converter
22
which produces a high resolution error signal. The output of the high resolution A/D converter
22
is communicated to a ZFE update calculation unit
23
which, in turn, uses the high resolution error signal to calculate tap weight updates for use in the equalizer
14
. The unit
23
communicates the tap weight updates to the tapped delay equalizer
14
which adds the tap weight updates to the tap weights within the equalizer
14
. As is known, the ZFE update calculation unit
23
uses a zero forcing algorithm to calculate the correlation between the error in the main path signal, as output by the A/D converter
22
, and delayed versions of that signal at a number of times delayed from the main signal path sampling time. The unit
23
uses these correlation values to determine tap weight adjustments which, when added to the tap weights within the tapped delay equalizer
14
, causes the equalizer to effectively drive the signal at the feedback point
24
to zero at all sampling times except the sampling time associated with the main signal path (or the impulse response at the decision unit
20
is the same as sent by the transmitter
10
). In this manner, the feedback path of the A/D converter
22
and the ZFE update calculation unit
23
automatically adapts the tap weights within the equalizer
14
to account for and negate distortions caused by changes in the channel, noise, etc., all of which can cause intersymbol interference.
While intersymbol interference can generally be corrected through equalization, current methods of equalization are relatively slow, inefficient and consume a lot of power. Furthermore, the traditional ZFE algorithm as used in the system of
FIG. 1
often does not result in the best bit error rate (BER) because the common implementation of a ZFE algorithm adapts the tap weights within the tapped delay equalizer
14
to cancel intersymbol interference at the feedback point
24
, not at the decision point, i.e., where symbol decoding is taking place. Thus, if, as is generally the case, the feedback point
24
is not at the end of the demodulation path, i.e., where symbol decoding is taking place, or if the feedback path itself introduces distortions, or if the tapped delay equalizer
14
has imperfections, the ZFE algorithm will not be able to adapt the tap weights in a manner that accounts for all of the distortions introduced by the elements (and only the elements) through which the signal being decoded passes. In addition, as a result of canceling intersymbol interference, noise is often added to the channel by the feedback loop. Thus, while a traditional ZFE cancels the intersymbol interference detected, this ZFE may still cause an increase in the BER over that possible.
For example, in the system of
FIG. 1
, the decision unit
20
performs symbol decoding on the output of the A/D converter
18
while the ZFE update calculation unit
23
makes equalizer tap weight adjustments based on the output of the A/D converter
22
, which are different A/D converters. As a result, the transfer function of the A/D converter
18
is not taken into account in the ZFE update calculation unit
23
and, likewise, the transfer function of the A/D converter
22
is not taken into account by the decision unit
20
, leading to a mismatch between the symbol decoding and equalizer functions. This, in turn, can lead to errors in symbol decoding and to an increased BER, which is undesirable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An equalization system includes an equalizer which uses a set of tap weights to equalize a received signal, a ZFE update calculation unit which determines tap weight adjustments to drive the output of the equalizer to zero at sampling times other than sampling times associated with the main path signal and an offset device which adds offsets to the tap weight updates calculated by the ZFE update calculation unit before the tap weight updates are provided to the equalizer. The offsets stored in the offset device force the equalizer to equalize to some level of non-zero error, with the level of error being determined to provide a more robust equalizer that accounts for the transfer function of demodulation elements not in the feedback path of the equalizer or to provide a better BER.
According to one aspect of the invention, an equalizing apparatus equalizes a received signal. The equalizing apparatus includes an equalizer which has a plurality of adjustable tap weights that equalizes the received signal based on values of the adjustable tap weights, a tap weight update calculation unit that is coupled to the equalizer and that is adapted to determine tap weight updates for use in adjusting the tap weights during operation of the equalizer, an offset memory that stores one or more tap weight update offset values and a summer that is coupled to the tap weight update calculation unit and to the offset memory. The summer is combines each of the tap weight updates with one of the tap weight update offset values to produce modified tap weight updates which, in turn, are prov
Phu Phoung
Terje Gudmestad
The Boeing Company
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus implementation of a zero forcing equalizer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus implementation of a zero forcing equalizer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus implementation of a zero forcing equalizer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3251292