Check-actuated control mechanisms – Including means to test validity of check – By testing material composition
Reexamination Certificate
1999-11-22
2001-01-16
Olszewski, Robert P. (Department: 3652)
Check-actuated control mechanisms
Including means to test validity of check
By testing material composition
Reexamination Certificate
active
06173826
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for validating coins.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention is intended especially for use in validating coins having an inner, central core made of a first metallic material and an outer ring made of a second metallic material. Such coins are commonly known as bi-colour coins. The invention is also useful for coins having two or more outer rings of different compositions. One or more of the core and outer ring(s) may be formed of layers of two or more materials, in a “clad” construction.
The term coin is used throughout the specification to mean any coin (whether genuine or counterfeit), token, slug, washer, or other metallic object or item, and especially any metallic object or item which could be used in an attempt to operate a coin-operated device or system. A “valid coin” is considered to be an authentic coin, token, or the like, of an acceptable denomination and which a coin-operated device or system is intended selectively to receive and to treat as an item of value, and especially an authentic coin of a monetary system or systems in which or with which a coin-operated device or system is intended to operate.
Various techniques for validating coins and, in particular, for testing the material of coins, are known. Coin testing apparatus is well known in which a coin is subjected to a test by passing it through a passageway in which it enters an oscillating magnetic field produced by an induct-or and measuring the degree of interaction between the coin and the field, the resulting measurement being dependent upon one or more characteristics of the coin and being compared with a reference value, or each of a set of reference values, corresponding to the measurement obtained from one or more denominations of acceptable coins. It is most is usual to apply more than one such test, the respective tests being responsive to respective different coin characteristics, and to judge the tested coin acceptable only if all the test results are appropriate to a single, acceptable, denomination of coin. An example of such apparatus is described in GB-A-2 093 620.
More specifically, it is known from EP 0 710 933 to test bi-colour coins using an inductive sensor, in the form of pair of coils, in combination with two optical sensors. in the apparatus described in EP 0 710 933 the optical sensors are used to control the operation of the inductive sensor to produce a first reading of the coin when the coin is centred on the coils and a second reading when the outer rim portion of the coin is centred on the coils, that is, when the rim portion in combination with other adjacent portions of the coin are in the field of the sensors.
A disadvantage of the device mentioned above is that, if an optical sensor becomes dirty, the accuracy of the timing of the reading of the inductive sensors, which is controlled by the optical sensors, may be reduced. Further, the optical sensor may fail to operate altogether if, for example, the light source or detector is blocked by a piece of dust. Another disadvantage is that the device uses a measurement taken when both the outer rim material and the centre material of the coin, and thus the interface between the two materials, are within the field of the coils for validating the coin. It has been found that the effect on an inductive sensor of a portion of a bi-colour coin including the interface between the two materials changes over the life of a coin, and also it will not necessarily be the same for all coins of the same type, so that coin validation based on a measurement taken over the interface may not be accurate. All the above disadvantages can lead to a valid coin being rejected or an invalid coin accepted.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The object of the present invention is to mitigate or overcome one or more of the above-mentioned disadvantages.
The present invention provides a device for validating a coin comprising an electro-magnetic sensor, means for deriving first and second signals from the sensor and means for deriving a measurement from the second signal, wherein the event of the first signal taking a predetermined threshold value is used to derive said measurement.
The second signal is representative of the material of a coin passing through the sensor and the first signal can be considered as a trigger which is used to select the appropriate part of the second signal. Because a signal from the electromagnetic sensor itself is used as a trigger, there is no need for external timing triggering means like, for example, the optical sensors in the prior art. Thus, the disadvantages encountered with the optical sensors are eliminated. Also, the device operates with fewer components, which can reduce the cost.
The threshold value can be chosen to trigger measurement for any desired point on a coin. Preferably, the threshold value is chosen to derive a measurement for a non-central portion of a valid coin.
The invention is suitable for validating coins having a central core and more than one outer ring, for example, bi-colour coins.
The first and second signals may be sampled at intervals. Interpolation techniques may be used to derive a measurement from the second signal.
Preferably, the sensor comprises a pair of coils connected in a self-excited oscillator circuit, the coils being arranged opposite each other on either side of a path for a coin. The first signal may represent the oscillator frequency and the second signal the oscillator amplitude. Alternatively, the first signal may represent the oscillator amplitude and the second signal the oscillator frequency.
Preferably, the threshold value is selected to derive a measurement for an outer ring portion of a valid coin. In the case of a bi-colour coin, a measurement is preferably obtained for only the outer ring portion of the coin, that is a measurement obtained when only the outer ring portion of the coin influences the sensor. By deriving a measurement when only the outer rim portion of the coin is next to the sensor, the device avoids the difficulties encountered when taking a “mixed measurement”, that is a measurement of both materials of the coin at the same time including the interface.
Preferably, the measurement is taken as the coin moves downstream from the sensor, that is, when the centre of the coin has sassed the centre of the sensor, where the motion of the coin is more stable.
The invention also provides a device for validating a bi-colour coin, wherein the first signal is used to derive a measurement representative of only the outer rim material of a valid coin.
The invention further provides a method for validating a coin comprising deriving first and second signals from a sensor, detecting the event of the first signal taking a predetermined threshold value and using the detection of that event to derive a measurement from the second signal.
The invention also provides a method for validating a coin comprising monitoring a first signal generated by the sensor, and using the first signal to derive a measurement from a second signal generated by the sensor, which measurement is predominantly representative of a non-central portion of a valid coin. Preferably, the method is for validating a bi-colour coin, wherein the first signal is used to derive a measurement representative of only the outer rim material of a valid coin.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3797307 (1974-03-01), Johnston
patent: 4995497 (1991-02-01), Kai et al.
patent: 5119916 (1992-06-01), Carmen et al.
patent: 5263566 (1993-11-01), Nara et al.
patent: 5402873 (1995-04-01), Ibarrola et al.
patent: 5404987 (1995-04-01), Allan et al.
patent: 5609234 (1997-03-01), Walker et al.
patent: 5715926 (1998-02-01), Furneaux et al.
patent: 0 017 370 (1980-10-01), None
patent: 0 202 378 B1 (1986-11-01), None
patent: 0 710 933 A2 (1996-05-01), None
patent: 2 093 620 (1982-09-01), None
patent: 2 109 975 (1983-06-01), None
patent: WO 93/04448 (1993-03-01), None
patent: WO 93/22747 (1993-11-01), None
Fish & Richardson P.C.
Jaketic Bryan
Mars Incorporated
Olszewski Robert P.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for validating coins does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for validating coins, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for validating coins will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2434928