Communications: directive radio wave systems and devices (e.g. – Directive – Position indicating
Reexamination Certificate
2003-09-29
2004-09-07
Blum, Theodore M. (Department: 3662)
Communications: directive radio wave systems and devices (e.g.,
Directive
Position indicating
C342S463000, C342S457000, C342S357490
Reexamination Certificate
active
06788253
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to obtaining geo-location estimates and, more particularly, for improving accuracy in obtaining such estimates in mobile communications networks. The invention also relates to combating near-far interference in wireless communication environments.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In mobile communications networks, for example, Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS) employing Frequency Division Duplex (FDD), base stations continually broadcast pilot signals that are spread using a known (standardized) pseudo-random sequence. All base stations in a UMTS network use the same pilot signal sequence. However, pilot signal sequences used by base stations are offset from one another in time. UMTS mobile wireless terminals (and wireless terminals in other multiple access systems that may employ Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) based technologies or other spread spectrum technologies) are capable of measuring the relative phase differences between any two detected pilot signal sequences. This measurement capability provides a mechanism that can be used to help determine the location of a mobile wireless terminal.
Mobile wireless terminal estimates of the relative phase difference of detectable pilot signals are used by the Observed Time Difference of Arrival (OTDOA) geo-location technique outlined in the UMTS system specification (see for example, 3PP TS 25.305 v5.4.0, “Stage
2
functional specification of User Equipment (UE) positioning in UTRAN”). One such prior art system is shown in FIG.
1
.
It is noted without further comment that circle
105
is based on the round trip time estimate of a transmission from mobile wireless terminal
101
to serving base station
102
and back; that hyperbola
106
is the OTDOA hyperbola along which a pilot signal phase measurement is constant between serving base station
102
and neighboring base station
104
; and that hyperbola
107
is the OTDOA hyperbola along which a pilot signal phase measurement is constant between serving base station
102
and neighboring base station
103
.
Pilot signals from at least three different base stations
102
,
103
and
104
are required to accurately estimate the position of a mobile wireless terminal
101
using the OTDOA method, or any other geo-location method employing triangulation of pilot signal measurements of the serving base station
102
and neighboring base stations
103
and
104
. Because of the interference-limited nature of mobile communications systems and, in particular, CDMA based systems such as UMTS, detecting pilot signals from two or more neighboring base stations is often not possible over a large portion of the coverage area of a cell. It is well known, for example, that due to the near-far effect, when all base stations are transmitting at maximum power, only the pilot signal from the serving base station
102
can be detectable by the mobile wireless terminal
101
over as much as 40% of the cell's coverage area (the region nearest the base station). When only a single base station is detectable in these prior known systems, the error of the geo-location estimate is unacceptably high. This error can cause OTDOA-based algorithms to fail to satisfy the stringent position error requirements outlined by the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the Phase II of the Enhanced 911 (E911) Mandate for emergency calls (see for example, FCC E911 Calls, www.fcc.gov/911/enhanced):
for network-based solutions: within 100 m for 67% of calls and within 300 m for 95% of calls;
for handset-based solutions: within 50 m for 67% of calls, and within 150 m for 95% of calls.
Visibility of more than one pilot signal is a serious issue, especially in the FDD system of UMTS, from a geo-location perspective. This is because the transmission from the strongest pilot signal, the one creating the near-far interference, the phenomena that does not allow to measure other pilots, is continuous.
For clarity of this invention, the global interference level at a mobile wireless terminal in a wireless communication environment is generated by all non-desired signals that generate activity, voluntarily or involuntarily, on the same bandwidth with the signal coming from the desired communication unit. Referring to the scenario addressed by this invention, the desired signal to the mobile wireless terminal is (are) the one (those) coming from the serving base station(s). Note than in CDMA, the soft handover feature allows the mobile wireless terminal to communicate with more than one base station simultaneously, thus mobile wireless terminal has multiple serving base stations in soft handover scenarios. The non-desired signals are those signals coming from other base stations that are not serving the mobile wireless terminal. Due to the reuse factor of one (1) often employed by the systems based on spread spectrum technologies such as CDMA, such systems are inherently characterized by both intra-cell interference and inter-cell interference. The intra-cell interference comes from concurrent communications that are active on the cell area covered by the serving base station(s). The inter-cell interference comes from concurrent communications that are active on neighboring cells. The effect of intra-cell and inter-cell interference is cumulative, and it is what ultimately the mobile wireless terminal measures in order to monitor the system conditions for quality link control for example. The applicant has observed that there is a link between the global level of interference that is present at the mobile wireless terminal location and the visibility of pilot signals from different base stations at the same mobile wireless terminal location, thus the expected accuracy of the geo-location process. This aspect will be further exploited in this invention
It can be shown that the global interference has the highest values when close to the serving base station
102
, and not in the region of borders of adjacent cells. Actually, the global interference level decreases when the mobile wireless terminal
101
is moving away from the serving base station(s), e.g., for example base station
102
shown in FIG.
1
. The individual contribution of both intra and inter-cell interference to the global interference is that the level of intra-cell interference decreases with the distance from the base station and the behavior of the inter-cell interference is exactly opposite (see for example, D. Calin, “Geo-location Issues and Accuracy Performance in Wireless Networks”, invited paper to the ASWN02 (Applications and Services in Wireless Networks) workshop, July 2002, France).
The high level of global interference in the region close to the serving base station makes possible reception from only one pilot signal, the one from the serving base station. The unavailability of other reference, i.e., pilot, signals may affect dramatically the geo-location accuracy. For all the situations where only one pilot signal is available, the mobile wireless terminal can be located anywhere in the serving sector of a cell at a distance given by the round trip delay. This is a problem in any system based on the FDD system of CDMA or any other wireless technology where the transmission of pilot signals is continuous.
The pilot signal visibility depends dramatically on the system loading, and if the system is operated at heavy loading, there is a very high probability to measure only one pilot signal. The near-far interference region is very large in these scenarios and this affects dramatically the mobile positioning accuracy.
One approach to increasing the possibility of mobile terminals detecting two or more pilot signals from neighboring base stations is the introduction of the Idle Period in DownLink (IPDL) feature in the UMTS system specification. IPDL is currently an optional feature of UMTS networks (see the “Stage
2
functional specification of User Equipment (UE) positioning in UTRAN” noted above). The IPDL solution decreases system-wide interference by temporarily switchin
Blum Theodore M.
Lucent Technologies - Inc.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for use in improving accuracy in... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for use in improving accuracy in..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for use in improving accuracy in... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3250791