Butchering – Tenderizers
Reexamination Certificate
2008-03-04
2008-03-04
Price, Thomas (Department: 3643)
Butchering
Tenderizers
Reexamination Certificate
active
07338356
ABSTRACT:
A method for tenderizing meat of a red meat slaughter animal includes separating a vertebra of the animal and applying electrical stimulation to the animal's musculature. The vertebra separating is performed prior to the onset of rigor mortis to enable stretching of muscle fibers in the carcass. The electrical stimulation is focused on a midsection of the animal.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1614312 (1927-01-01), Miller
patent: 2026242 (1935-12-01), Miller
patent: 2544681 (1951-03-01), Harsham et al.
patent: 3483592 (1969-12-01), Aubert et al.
patent: 3579716 (1971-05-01), Stouffer et al.
patent: 3593369 (1971-07-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 3641625 (1972-02-01), Allinquant
patent: 3774264 (1973-11-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 3774265 (1973-11-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 3863294 (1975-02-01), Barbee
patent: 3940830 (1976-03-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 4221021 (1980-09-01), Swilley
patent: 4262388 (1981-04-01), Durand et al.
patent: 4337550 (1982-07-01), Baylor et al.
patent: 4358872 (1982-11-01), VanZandt
patent: 4525896 (1985-07-01), Leining et al.
patent: 4667368 (1987-05-01), Menqi
patent: 4667371 (1987-05-01), Vogt
patent: 4706335 (1987-11-01), Schram et al.
patent: 5045021 (1991-09-01), Borup
patent: 5632670 (1997-05-01), Gwyther
patent: 5727997 (1998-03-01), Dufour et al.
patent: 5855507 (1999-01-01), Fisher et al.
patent: 5888132 (1999-03-01), Burnett
patent: 5899802 (1999-05-01), Burnett
patent: 5954573 (1999-09-01), Ohgaki et al.
patent: 5968565 (1999-10-01), Owens et al.
patent: 6019033 (2000-02-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 6050889 (2000-04-01), Jacobs et al.
patent: 6290592 (2001-09-01), Allen et al.
patent: 6364759 (2002-04-01), Allen et al.
patent: 6478667 (2002-11-01), Bell et al.
patent: 6648744 (2003-11-01), Bell et al.
patent: 0 032 110 (1981-07-01), None
Defendant Swift & Company's Initial Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Nov. 16, 2005.
Defendants's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Defendant's Answer to First Amended Complaint, Counterclaims and Demand for Jury (with LR 7.1 Certificate of Conference), Case No. 5-505CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 19, 2005.
Defendant Swift's Answer to First Amended Complaint, Amended Counterclaims and Demand for Jury, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 19, 2005.
[Agreed Propsed] Order on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaims, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 19, 2005.
Defendant Swift's Answer to First Amended Complaint, Amended Counterclaims and Demand for Jury, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 21, 2005.
Swift & Company's Answer to Second Amended Complaint and Amended Counterclaims and Jury Demand, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 30, 2005.
Texas Tech University's Objections and Responses to Swift & Company's First Set of Requests for Production, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Norther District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Nov. 9, 2005.
Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.'s Objections and Responses to Swift & Company's First Set of Requests for Production, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Nov. 9, 2005.
Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.'s Objections and Responses to Swift & Company's First set of Interrogatories, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Norther District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Nov. 9, 2005.
Plaintiff Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.'s Responses to Defendant Swift & company's First Set of Request for Admissions, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Nov. 9, 2005.
Defendant Swift & Company's Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things to Defendant, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Oct. 24, 2005.
Defendant Swift & Company's Responses to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Oct. 24, 2005.
Defendant Swift's Answer to First Amended Complaint, Counterclaims and Demand for Jury, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C,Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Universityv.Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Jul. 22, 2005.
Proceedings 46th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference,American Meat Science Association, Published by National Live Stock And Meat Board, (1994).
Got, F. et al. “Effects of high-intensity high-frequency ultrasound on ageing rate, ultrastructure and some physico-chemical properties of beef”,Meat Science51 pp. 35-42 (1999).
Lan, Y. H. et al., “Thermal Gelation of Stretched and Cold-Shortened Bovine Sternomandibularis Muscle and Myofibrils”,Journal of Food Science, vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 661-663 (1985).
Swatland, H. J., “Effect of stretching pre-rigor muscle on the backscattering of polarized near-infrared”,Food Research International, vol. 29, No. 5-6, pp.445-449, (1996).
Lyon, C. E., et al. “Research Note: Effects of Wing Restrainst on the Objective Texture of commercially Processed Broiler Breast Meat”,Poulty Science71 pp. 1228-1231 (1992).
Mitchell, et al., “Tenderizing, Aging, and Thawing Effects on Sensory, Chemical, and Physical Properties of Best Steaks”,Journal of Food Science- 1125, vol. 58, No. 5, (1991).
Winstanley, Monica, B. Sc., Ph.D. of the Meat Research Institute “The aging of meat”,Nutrition and Food Sciencepp. 8-10, (Sep./Oct. 1979).
Norman, G.A, et al. “The influence of carcase position during rigor on the tenderness of bovine muscles from mature zebu animals”,Trop. Sci. pp. 287-296, (1980).
Wang, H., et al., “ tenderness of Prerigor Stretched Porcine Longissimus Muscle”Journal of Muscle Foods, vol. 6, No. 1, Marriott et al., Food & Nutrition Press, Inc., pp. 75-82 (1995).
Wang, H. et al. “Selected Skeletal Alterations To Improve Tenderness Of Beef Round Muscles”Journal of Muscle Foods, vol. 5, No. 2, Marriott et al., Food & Nutrition Press, Inc., pp. 137-147 (1994).
Wang, H. et al., “Prerigor Treatment and Endpoint Temperature Effects On U.S. Choice Beef Tenderness”,Journal of Muscle Foods, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 45-54 (1996).
Marriott, N. G., et al. “Meat Tenderness Revisited”,Overviews, meat Focus Internationalpp.373-376 September (1994).
Claus et al., “Prerigor Carcass Muscle Stretching Effects on Tenderness of Grain-fed Beef Under Commercial Conditions”,Journal of Food Science, vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 1231-1234, (Nov.-Dec. 1997).
Ludwig et al., “Skeletal Alteration to Improve Beef Longissimus Muscle Tenderness”,Journal of Animal Science, vol. 75, No. 9, pp. 2404-2410 (Sep. 1997).
Quarrier et al, “A Physical Method to Increase Tenderness in Lamb Carcasses”,Journal of Food Science, vol. 37 No. 1, 3 pgs. (Jan.-Feb 1972).
Claus, j.R., et al., “Prerigor Skeletal Cuts To Improve Beef Tenderness Under Commercial Conditions”,American Meat Science Association, pp. 606-607.
Herring, H.K, et al. “Furthe
Bell Brian W.
Dolezal Howard G.
Grose Darren J.
Cargill Incorporated
Price Thomas
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for tenderizing meat does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for tenderizing meat, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for tenderizing meat will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2786466