Method and apparatus for tenderizing meat

Butchering – Tenderizers

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07364503

ABSTRACT:
A method for tenderizing meat of a red meat slaughter animal includes separating a vertebra of the animal and applying electrical stimulation to the animal's musculature. The vertebra separating is performed prior to the onset of rigor mortis to enable stretching of muscle fibers in the carcass. The electrical stimulation is focused on a midsection of the animal.

REFERENCES:
patent: 1614312 (1927-01-01), Miller
patent: 2026242 (1935-12-01), Miller
patent: 2544681 (1951-03-01), Harsham et al.
patent: 3579716 (1971-05-01), Stouffer et al.
patent: 3593369 (1971-07-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 3641625 (1972-02-01), Allinquant
patent: 3774264 (1973-11-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 3774265 (1973-11-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 3863294 (1975-02-01), Barbee
patent: 3940830 (1976-03-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 4221021 (1980-09-01), Swilley
patent: 4262388 (1981-04-01), Durand et al.
patent: 4337550 (1982-07-01), Baylor et al.
patent: 4358872 (1982-11-01), VanZandt
patent: 4525896 (1985-07-01), Leining et al.
patent: 4667368 (1987-05-01), Menqi
patent: 4667371 (1987-05-01), Vogt
patent: 4706335 (1987-11-01), Schram et al.
patent: 5045021 (1991-09-01), Borup
patent: 5263891 (1993-11-01), Weiner et al.
patent: 5632670 (1997-05-01), Gwyther
patent: 5727997 (1998-03-01), Dufour et al.
patent: 5855507 (1999-01-01), Fisher et al.
patent: 5888132 (1999-03-01), Burnett
patent: 5899802 (1999-05-01), Burnett
patent: 5954573 (1999-09-01), Ohgaki et al.
patent: 5968565 (1999-10-01), Owens et al.
patent: 6019033 (2000-02-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 6050889 (2000-04-01), Jacobs et al.
patent: 6290592 (2001-09-01), Allen et al.
patent: 6364759 (2002-04-01), Allen et al.
patent: 6478667 (2002-11-01), Bell et al.
patent: 6648744 (2003-11-01), Bell et al.
patent: 0 032 110 (1981-07-01), None
patent: 0 565 000 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 00/40094 (2000-07-01), None
Proceedings 46th Annual Reciprocal Meat Conference,American Meat Science Association, Published by National Live Stock and Meat Board, (1994).
Got, F. et al. “Effects of high-intensity high-frequency ultrasound on ageing rate, ultrastructure and some physico-chemical properties of beef”,Meat Science51 pgs. 35-42 (1999).
Lan, Y. H. et al., “Thermal Gelation of Stretched and Cold-Shortened Bovine Stemomandibularis Muscle and Myofibrils”,Journal of Food Science, vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 661-663 (1985).
Swatland, H. J., “Effect of stretching pre-rigor muscle on the backscattering of polarized near-infrared”,Food Research International, vol. 29, No. 5-6, pp. 445-449, (1996).
Lyon, C.E., et al. “Research Note: Effects of Wing Restraints on the Objective Texture of Commercially Processed Broiler Breast Meat”,Poultry Science71 pp. 1228-1231 (1992).
Mitchell, et al., “Tenderizing, Aging, and Thawing Effects on Sensory, Chemical, and Physical Properties of Best Steaks”,Journal of Food Science-1125, vol. 58, No. 5, (1991).
Winstanley, Monica, B. Sc., Ph.D. of the Meat Research Institute “The aging of meat”,Nutrition and Food Sciencepp. 8-10, (Sep/Oct. 1979).
Norman, G.A, et al. “The Influence of carcase position during rigor on the tenderness of bovine muscles from mature zebu animals”,Trop. Sci.pgs. 287-296, (1980).
Wang, H., et al., “Tenderness of Prerigor Stretched Porcine Longissimus Muscle”Journal of Muscle Foods, vol. 6, No. 1, Marriott et al., Food & Nutrition Press, Inc., pp. 75-82 (1995).
Wang, H. et al. “Selected Sketetal Alterations To Improve Tendernessn of Beef Round Muscles”Journal of Muscle Foods, vol. 5, No. 2, Marriot et al., Food & Nutrition Press, Inc., pp. 137-147 (1994).
Wang H. et al., “Prerigor Treatment and Endpoint Temperature Effects On U.S. Choice Beef Tenderness”,Journal of Muscle Foods, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 45-54 (1996).
Marriott, N. G., et al. “Meat Tenderness Revisited”,Overviews, Meat Focus Internationalpp. 373-376 Sep. (1994).
Claus et al., “Prerigor Carcass Muscle Stretching Effects on Tenderness of Grain-fed Beef Under Commercial Conditions”,Journal of Food Science, vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 1231-1234, (Nov.-Dec. 1997).
Ludwig et al., “Skeletal Alteration to Improve Beef Longissimus Muscle Tenderness”,Journal of Animal Science, vol. 75, No. 9, pp. 2404-2410 (Sep. 1997).
Quarrier et al, “A Physical Method to Increase Tenderness in Lamb Carcasses”,Journal of Food Science, vol. 37 No. 1, 3 pgs. (Jan. -Feb. 1972).
Claus, J.R., et al., “Prerigor Skeletal Cuts To Improve Beef Tenderness Under Commercial Conditions”,American Meat Science Association, pp. 606-607.
Herring, H.K, et al. “Further Studies on Bovine Muscle Tenderness as Influenced by Carcass Position, Sarcomere Length, and Fiber Diameter”Journal of Food Science, vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 1049-1054 (Nov. -Dec.), 1965.
Beaty, S.L., et al., “Early Postmortem Skeletal Alterations Effect on Sarcomere Lenght, Myofibbillar Fragmentation, and Muscle Tenderness of Beef From Light-Weight, Brangus Heifers”,Journal of Muscle Foods, pp. 67-78 (Feb. 3, 1998).
Plaintiff Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.'s Responses to Defendant Swift & company's First Set of Request for Admissions, Case No. 5-05cv0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Nov. 9, 2005.
Defendant Swift & Company's Responses to Plantiff's First Set of Requests for Prodoction of Documents and Things to Defendant, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Oct. 24, 2005.
Defendant Swift & Company's Responses to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Oct. 24, 2005.
Defendant Swift's Answer to First Amendment Complaint, Counterclaims and Demand for Jury, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University V. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Jul. 22, 2005.
Defendant Swift & Company's Initial Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Nov. 16, 2005.
Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Defendant's Answer to First Amended Complaint, Counterclaims and Demand for Jury (with LR 7.1 Certificate of Conference), Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech Univerity v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 19, 2005.
Defendant Swift's Answer to First Amended Complaint, Amended Counterclaims and Demand for Jury, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 19, 2005.
[Agreed Proposed] Order on Defendent's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaims, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 19, 2005.
Defendant Swift's Answer to First Amended Complaint, Amended Counterclaims and Demand for Jury, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Dec. 21, 2005.
Swift & Company's Answer to Second Amended Complaint and Amended Counterclaims and Jury Demand, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division. Dec. 30, 2005.
Texas Tech University's Objections and Responses to Swift & Company's First Set of Requests for Production, Case No. 5-05CV0021-C, Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and Texas Tech University v. Swift & Company, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, Nov. 9, 2005.
Carg

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for tenderizing meat does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for tenderizing meat, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for tenderizing meat will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2766840

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.