Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types
Patent
1996-12-20
1998-11-24
Amsbury, Wayne
Data processing: database and file management or data structures
Database design
Data structure types
707500, 707507, 707508, 707530, 345128, 345354, 345352, G06F 1730
Patent
active
058421955
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
The present invention relates to a system and method for obtaining and collating information from a plurality of computer users. More particularly, but not exclusively, the invention relates to a method and system for asking questions of computer users having access to electronic mail, and to a method and system for collating their responses and presenting them in a database.
In recent years, developments in communication systems and computer technology have enabled communication between computers over vast distances utilising communications networks. Employing electronic mail and like systems, it is possible for a user of a personal computer (or any other type of computer) with access to a modem or other network communications interface, to communicate with any number of users of remote computers e.g., via the internet. Distance is no barrier. Further, in small or large companies electronic mail networks are often used to connect user terminals to enable communication in-house between users.
The possibility of communication with any number of users having access to electronic mail opens up vast information gathering potential.
To obtain and process such large amounts of information, however, presents a number of problems. Using electronic mail and like systems task for a user of a computer may ask a question or questions of a relatively large number of remote users, by addressing mail including a question or questions to those users.
The task of processing responses to the question or questions becomes extremely difficult. Where a large number of users provide responses, the task can be almost impossible. This difficultly will be aggravated where a large number of questions are asked. The amount of information to process can be staggering and the user who asked the questions may be faced with the onerous task of sorting through a large amount of mail, item by item, to extract and collate the information he requires. Where a large amount of information is required from a large number of people, it is impractical for one person to deal with.
Consider the example of opinion polls, whether for marketing, political or other purposes. Presently, large numbers of field operators are required to gather numerous responses from members of the public. Once those responses have been gathered, hundreds and even thousands of man-hours are required to process the responses to extract the required information and present it in a form which allows for analysis. Thousands of questionaries may need processing, each with many questions and responses. It should also be noted that the time taken to gather and process the responses can mean that the information finally revealed from the opinion poll has lost it's relevance or at least become less relevant. Consider a political opinion poll, where peoples opinions may be varying from day to day, significantly enough to affect the election result. An opinion poll which takes two or three days to process will be out of date and irrelevant by the time the results are available for publication.
There are really two major problems with presently available "surveying". Firstly, there is the problem of how does a person ask the questions of all the people he wishes to ask the questions of, without expending many man hours or employing a number of people as field operators? This problem is somewhat alleviated by the existence of systems such as electronic mail, which enable a person to select a number of people to send a single document to. There is the problem here, however, that no convenient means exists of asking a series of complex, linked questions. For example, a persons answer to a particular question may determine whether or not a subsequent question is relevant to that person. If the person is asked whether they are taking leave from employment that year to go on holiday, and answer no, there is no point in asking them where they are going on holiday. Electronic mail like communication systems do not deal with that problem.
Even though electronic mail and like communication sy
REFERENCES:
patent: 4355372 (1982-10-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 4937439 (1990-06-01), Wanninger
patent: 4958284 (1990-09-01), Bishop et al.
patent: 5075771 (1991-12-01), Hashimoto
patent: 5097408 (1992-03-01), Huber
patent: 5261094 (1993-11-01), Everson et al.
patent: 5532838 (1996-07-01), Barbari
Graphics, Visualisation and Usability Centre, "HTML Information Survey Form" (James Pitkow) Georgia Institute of Technology Jan. 1994.
The GVU Centre's WWW Users Surveys, "Results from the first World-Wide Web User Servey" (James Pitkow, Margaret Recker), May 25, 1994.
"Using the Web as a survey tool: Results from the second WWW User Survey" (James Pitkow, Margaret Recker), Oct. 1994.
"Simple connection changes business" (Lynn Haber) Midrange Systems, v6, n20, p44(1), Oct. 26, 1993.
Barwell Peter
Peters Graham
Amsbury Wayne
Dolphin Software Pty Ltd
Mizvahi Diane D.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for preparation of a database document in a does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for preparation of a database document in a, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for preparation of a database document in a will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1715060