Electrophotography – Control of electrophotography process – Control of charging
Patent
1998-09-29
2000-12-26
Grainger, Quana M.
Electrophotography
Control of electrophotography process
Control of charging
399 46, 399 51, G03G 1502
Patent
active
061672106
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to a method for optimizing a charge image generation of a photoconductor of electrophotographic printer and copier devices.
2. Description of the Related Art
Compared to the copying results that can be achieved with electrophotographic copier devices, the user of such devices makes considerably higher quality demands of the printing results that can be achieved with electrographic printer devices. Users of copier devices therefore also accept copying results that are somewhat poorer compared to the original of the copy.
Since electrophotographic printer devices, however, are usually employed in conjunction with EDP (electronic data processing) systems and the possibilities for the user to influence the print quality are slight in this respect, extremely high quality demands exist in the case of electrophotographic printer devices. In order to do justice to these high demands, it is necessary to reduce the allowable tolerance ranges in electrophotographic processes.
Electrophotographic printer device print, for example, single sheets or continuous stock in that a latent image is generated on a photoconductor that preferably has the form of a drum. To this end, the photoconductor is charged to a defined charging potential. Subsequently, a latent image is generated on the photoconductor with an illumination means that supplies energy to the photoconductor in punctiform fashion, the latent image being generated in that the charge in the regions of the photoconductor is reduced to such an extent by illumination that these regions remains white in the subsequent printout in what is referred to as "charged area development" (CAD) or, respectively, are inked with toner in what is referred to as "discharged area development" (DAD). Following the exposure, toner is applied to the photoconductor with the assistance of a development means, the toner remaining adhering to the charged regions (CAD process) or, respectively, to the discharged regions (DAD process) of the photoconductor.
The toner image on the photoconductor is subsequently transferred onto, for example, paper or some other recording medium and is fused into the recording medium by heating in a following fixing station or connected thereto by adhesion forces arises when the toner image melts. After the toner image has been transferred onto the recording medium, the photoconductor is completely discharged and cleaned of residual toner in order to be subsequently completely charged again to a defined potential as preparation for the next exposure.
As FIG. 1 shows, the potential of the photoconductor upon illumination thereof decreases from a charging potential V2, to which the photoconductor was charge before the illumination and that can be kept constant with a charge regulation, to a substantially lower potential VD1 or, respectively, VD2 along a characteristic K1 or, respectively, K2. The potential of illuminated regions is dependent, on the one hand, on the height of the illumination energy, the duration of the illumination and the height of the charging potential V2.
On the other hand, the discharge characteristic K1, K2 and, thus, the height of the potential of exposed regions on the photoconductor is also influenced, for example, by manufacture-conditioned fluctuations, the quality of the photoconductor, its age, its temperature and is also influenced by the current process status just as, for example, the start of a printing process, longer pauses between individual printing processes or by a variety of environmental influences. Fluctuations in potential VD1, VD2 of the illuminated regions of the photoconductor derive therefrom that, due to the different toner acceptance in the development unit caused as a result thereof, lead to quality fluctuations of a print image to be produced.
For compensating temperature fluctuations, it is known to keep the photoconductor at a constant temperature during the entire operation. In part, the photoconductor is even kept at a
REFERENCES:
patent: 4502777 (1985-03-01), Okamoto et al.
patent: 4508446 (1985-04-01), Imai
patent: 4592646 (1986-06-01), Suzuki et al.
patent: 4855766 (1989-08-01), Suzuki
patent: 5019862 (1991-05-01), Nakamura et al.
patent: 5749022 (1998-05-01), Kikui et al.
patent: 6034703 (2000-03-01), Broddin et al.
Maess Volkhard
Schleusener Martin
Grainger Quana M.
Oce Printing Systems GmbH
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for optimizing a charge image on a photocon does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for optimizing a charge image on a photocon, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for optimizing a charge image on a photocon will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1004395