Pulse or digital communications – Receivers
Reexamination Certificate
1997-04-04
2001-05-15
Tse, Young T. (Department: 2634)
Pulse or digital communications
Receivers
C341S061000, C341S143000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06233287
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates in general to radio communication units, and particularly to radio communication units utilizing digital mixers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It has become common place to find receiver and transmitter circuits in a radio communication unit employing digital mixers instead of conventional analog mixers. Digital mixers perform substantially the same tasks as analog mixers. For example, for transmitter circuits, digital mixers can be used to up-convert a baseband signal to an IF (intermediate frequency) signal, where as for receiver circuits, digital mixers can be used to down-convert a high frequency signal to an IF signal. These are conventional operations of analog mixers. The rationale for changing to digital technology is based on the substantial benefits attained over analog technology in areas such as manufacture, quality, power consumption, and flexibility for redesign and control.
FIG. 1
illustrates a prior art structure for down-conversion digital mixers
100
. The digital mixer
100
includes an ADC (analog-to-digital converter)
104
, a digital filter
110
and a mixing element
114
. Alternatively, an up-conversion digital mixer
100
is employed with an analog-to-digital converter at the output of the mixing element
114
. A popular type of ADC is a sigma-delta converter. This type of ADC is popular because it allows for digital sampling of high frequency RF signals. Some structures have been known to sample RF signals operating at a carrier frequency of 600 MHz.
In order to perform the conversion of an analog signal
102
to a digital RF signal
108
operating at the same carrier frequency (e.g., IF
1
), a sampling clock
106
is provided to the ADC
104
. This sampling clock
106
is selected in accordance with the operational characteristics of the ADC
104
. Independent of the carrier frequency of the input signal
102
, the sampling clock
106
must operate at a fixed frequency, and cannot be arbitrarily varied. The inflexibility of varying the sampling clock
106
is a crucial limitation of prior art systems, for reasons that will become apparent shortly.
The digital filter
110
is generally used as an anti-aliasing filter as well as a pre-selection filter for filtering out unwanted frequencies in the digital signal
108
. The filtered digital signal
112
generated therefrom is applied to the mixing element
114
. The mixing element
114
is a digital mixer controlled by an injection signal
116
operating at a mixing frequency. The injection signal
116
conforms to the equation:
ⅇ
j2π
(
f
mix
f
s
)
n
.
Mathematically, the mixing operation is simply the complex multiplication of the filtered digital signal
112
and the injection signal
116
. Because digital multiplication operations consume a high amount of power, an undesirable factor in low-power consumer products, and because multiplication operations at high frequencies (e.g., 600 MHz) is not always achievable, the simplification of the injection signal equation is paramount. To eliminate the need for complex multiplication, prior art systems set the mixing frequency f
mix
to one-quarter the sampling frequency f
s
. By doing this the injection signal can be simplified to the equation (j)
n
. This equation results in a simplified periodic series of constants (1,j,−1,−j,1,j−1,−j, . . . ).
Utilizing a much simpler injection signal such as (j)
n
completely eliminates the need for a digital multiplier unit. Instead, a conventional digital logic can be used, which converts the digital values provided by the filtered digital signal
112
to complex in-phase and quadrature digital signals
118
without utilizing a digital multiplication circuit.
The elimination of high power consuming digital multipliers has proven to be a very effective means for utilizing digital mixers
100
in low power selective call units. However, the simplification method presented above, results in a significant constraint in the design of digital mixers. That is, this method provides for only one frequency conversion. Assuming the digital signal operates at an IF frequency IF
1
, the frequency conversion to a new IF frequency IF
2
follows the equation:
IF
2
=
IF
1
-
f
s
4
.
As should be apparent, the conversion process is limited to one mixing frequency (or injection frequency) f
s
/4. Restricting, the mixing frequency f
mix
to a single injection frequency, eliminates the flexibility of mixing a digital signal to any arbitrary frequency (e.g., baseband). This is a severe limitation when contrasted to analogous analog mixers.
Thus, low-power prior art digital mixers, employing the above method, are substantially limited by the sampling frequency
106
used by the selected ADC
104
. Accordingly, it is desirable to provide an improved digital mixer for selective call units that is capable of mixing digital signals at an arbitrary mixing frequency f
mix
. Moreover, the improved digital mixer should be capable of performing either up or down frequency conversion.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4757390 (1988-07-01), Mehrgardt et al.
patent: 4870661 (1989-09-01), Yamada et al.
patent: 5148167 (1992-09-01), Ribner
patent: 5349385 (1994-09-01), Glenn
patent: 5513209 (1996-04-01), Holm
patent: 5521949 (1996-05-01), Huang et al.
patent: 5621805 (1997-04-01), Loh et al.
patent: 5640424 (1997-06-01), Banavong et al.
patent: 5641629 (1997-06-01), Gibson et al.
patent: 5644677 (1997-07-01), Park et al.
patent: 5712635 (1998-01-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5748126 (1998-05-01), Ma et al.
patent: 5754601 (1998-05-01), Horng et al.
patent: 5757867 (1998-05-01), Caufield et al.
patent: 5970086 (1999-10-01), Epstein et al.
patent: 6084916 (2000-07-01), Ott
Bonet Luis Augusto
Kelley Brian Todd
Guntin Eduardo
Macnak Philip P.
Motorola Inc.
Tse Young T.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for mixing signals does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for mixing signals, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for mixing signals will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2451354