Ammunition and explosives – Blasting – Patterned blasting
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-25
2002-12-03
Jordan, Charles T. (Department: 3644)
Ammunition and explosives
Blasting
Patterned blasting
C102S313000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06487973
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for locking shape charges into a charge holder for use in well perforation operations. The improved apparatus eliminates the need to bend tabs on the charge holder to hold the charges in position.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The performance of an underground well, such as a hydrocarbon producing well, can be improved by perforating the formation containing the hydrocarbons. Well perforation operations involve the controlled detonation of shape charges within the well. The shape charges perforate the casing, if any, and the surrounding formation, thereby improving the flow of hydrocarbons from the well. A perforation gun is used to hold the shape charges. The perforation gun is lowered into the well on either tubing or a wireline until it is at the depth of the formation of interest. The gun assembly includes a charge holder that holds the shape charges and a carrier that protects the shape charges from the environment. A detonation cord links each charge located in the charge holder.
A shaped charge is inserted into a mating hole of the charge holder, and a charge retention apparatus holds the charge firmly within the mating hole. The charge retention apparatus normally include retaining rings, charge retention jackets, clips, or bending tabs, all of which are designed to secure the shaped charge in the charge holder. Thus, it is desirable to provide a method and apparatus for securing the shaped charge to the charge holder of a perforating gun without using a separate charge retention apparatus or bendable tabs.
An example of a common charge retention design is shown in
FIGS. 1
to
5
. A perforation gun
10
is shown having a charge holder
12
and a cover (not shown). The charge holder has at least one opening
16
for receiving the shape charge
18
. Each shape charge
18
has a case
20
that is generally conical in shape. An explosive charge is nestled into the case
20
. Most cases
20
also have a pair of tabs
22
that retain the detonation cord
24
. The detonation cord
24
can ignite the explosive charge through a detonation transfer passage
32
through the case
20
. The carrier can have scalloping
26
that corresponds to the location of each charge. The scalloping is an area of reduced thickness used to minimize any resistance to the exploding shape charge.
The gun is assembled by sequentially placing the charges
18
into the charge holder
12
. Once inserted, the charge must be secured in place. At least one deformable tab
30
can be used. The tip of a tool such as a screw driver is inserted into slot
28
, as shown in
FIG. 2
, and the tab
30
is deformed until it is in contact with the front of the charge case. There are obvious drawbacks to such a retention scheme. For one, fabrication of the slot
28
is expensive and time consuming. The charge holders
12
are typically made of steel and the slots require an additional fabrication step to cut. Further, the deformation of the tab
30
takes additional assembly time. It also causes a minor deformation to the rest of the charge holder. When many tabs are deformed, the overall charge holder can experience a meaningful length increase. The deformation of the charge holder can also cause a misalignment of the charges and scalloping
26
on the carrier. Equally troublesome is the inability to easily disassemble the loaded charge holder. If the perforation gun is lowered into a well and for an unknown reason fails to fire, the gun is removed from the well and disassembled. This requires a worker to remove the charge holder from the carrier and then use a tool to undeform the tabs
30
to remove the charge. The use of the tool around the live charges introduces a safety concern. Also, once disassembled, the charge holder is unusable and must be scrapped.
A need exists for an easier and less expensive method to load charges into a charge holder. Such a method should use an improved charge holder design that does not require the use of deformable tabs. One attempt at making such a charge holder is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,952,603 to Parrott and entitled “Insert and Twist Method and Apparatus for Securing a Shaped Charge to a Loading Tube or a Perforating Gun.” Rather than the use of tabs, Parrott '603 discloses the use of specially designed lugs on the charge case. In
FIGS. 6 and 7
illustrate an embodiment of the Parrott '603 design. A shaped charge case
52
is inserted into a mating hole
54
of a loading tube
50
prior to inserting the loading tube in a perforating gun carrier. The pair of retaining lugs
52
a
are inserted into slots
54
a
and
54
b
of the mating hole
54
and, simultaneously, the pair of shoulder lugs
52
c
are inserted into the first and second pair of grooves
54
c
and
54
d,
the lugs
52
c
being initially inserted into the large diameter groove L associated with the first and second pair of grooves
54
c,
54
d.
At this point, a wrench is required. The wrench is secured to the pair of support lugs
52
b
and twisted clockwise. The clockwise torque provided by the wrench on the support lugs
52
b
moves the shaped charge case
52
in a clockwise circumferential direction.
In
FIG. 7
, during the movement of the shaped charge case
52
in the clockwise circumferential direction, an end portion of the retaining lugs
52
a
move underneath a surface of the loading tube
50
. Simultaneously, the pair of shoulder lugs
52
c
move out of the large diameter groove L of the pair of grooves
54
c
and
54
d
and into the small diameter groove S of the pair of grooves
54
c
and
54
d.
In this position, the surface of the loading tube
50
prevents the retaining lugs
52
a
of the shaped charge case
52
from moving in an outward radial direction; and the small diameter groove S prevents the shoulder lugs
52
c
from moving in an inward radial direction. In addition, the small diameter groove S of the first and second pair of grooves
54
c
and
54
d
prevents the shaped charge case
52
from moving either clockwise or counterclockwise in a circumferential direction.
The Parrot '603 design is exceedingly difficult and expensive to fabricate. For example, most charge cases are made of either steel or zinc. To place the lugs on a steel case requires a welding step or a very expensive lathing process. Zinc can be cast, and therefore to be cost effective, one is essentially limited to the use of a zinc case. Therefore, a need exists for a simpler and less expensive apparatus for holding shape charges in a carrier. Such an apparatus should not require expensive milling steps to construct and should quick to assemble and disassemble. In the event of disassembly, the carrier should be reusable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention addresses many of the drawbacks found in prior art retention schemes. In one embodiment, the invention uses a pair of opposed tabs on the carrier to engage a groove in the case of the shape charge. The case is generally conical in shape. However, the front opening of the case has both a first and second circumferential ridge separated by a groove. The diameter of the groove generally matches the distance between tabs. The second ridge can have a flat milled thereon to allow case to be inserted until the tabs contact the forward or first ridge. This locates the tabs between the first and second ridges and over the groove. The case is then rotated so that the tabs are captured between the two ridges. In another embodiment, there is no forward ridge, and the tab only contacts the rear ridge.
Once installed, the detonation cord is attached to the case. The cord helps prevent any rotation of the case, thereby securing it into the charge holder. Thus, the use of easily milled tabs on the charge holder in conjunction with an easily milled groove and flats on the case provide an improved apparatus and method for securing the shape charge into the charge holder of a perforation gun. When the charges are all installed, and the detonation cord is properly
Gilbert, Jr. William James
Glenn Corbin
Carstens David W.
Halliburton Energy Service,s Inc.
Herman Paul I.
Jordan Charles T.
Smith Kimberly S.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for locking charges into a charge holder does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for locking charges into a charge holder, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for locking charges into a charge holder will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2980764