Wells – Processes – Heating – cooling or insulating
Reexamination Certificate
2002-03-13
2004-03-23
Bagnell, David (Department: 3672)
Wells
Processes
Heating, cooling or insulating
C166S269000, C166S222000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06708763
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the production of hydrocarbon wells. More particularly the invention relates to the use of pressurized steam to encourage production of hydrocarbons from a wellbore. More particularly still, the invention relates to methods and apparatus to inject steam into a wellbore at a controlled flow rate in order to urge hydrocarbons to another wellbore.
2. Description of the Related Art
Artificial lifting techniques are well known in the production of oil and gas. The hydrocarbon formations accessed by most wellbores do not have adequate natural pressure to cause the hydrocarbons to rise to the surface on their own. Rather, some type of intervention is used to encourage production. In some instances, pumps are used either in the wellbore or at the surface of the well to bring fluids to the surface. In other instances, gas is injected into the wellbore to lighten the weight of fluids and facilitate their movement towards the surface.
In still other instances, a compressible fluid like pressurized steam is injected into an adjacent wellbore to urge the hydrocarbons towards a producing wellbore. This is especially prevalent in a producing field with formations having heavy oil. The steam, through heat and pressure, reduces the viscosity of the oil and urges or “sweeps” it towards another wellbore. In a simple arrangement, an injection well includes a cased wellbore with perforations at an area of the wellbore adjacent a formation or production zone of interest. The production zones are typically separated and isolated from one another by layers of impermeable material. The area of the wellbore above and below the perforations is isolated with packers and steam is injected into the wellbore either by using the casing itself as a conduit or through the use of a separate string of tubulars coaxially disposed in the casing. The steam is generated at the surface of the well and may be used to provide steam to several injection wells at once. If needed, a simple valve monitors the flow of steam into the wellbore. While the forgoing example is adequate for injecting steam into a single zone, there are more typically multiple zones of interest adjacent a wellbore and sometimes it is desirable to inject steam into multiple zones at different depths of the same wellbore. Because each wellbore includes production zones with varying natural pressures and permeabilities, the requirement for the injected steam can vary between zones, creating a problem when the steam is provided from a single source.
One approach to injecting steam into multiple zones is simply to provide perforations at each zone and then inject the steam into the casing. While this technique theoretically exposes each zone to steam, it has practical limitations since most of the steam enters the highest zone in the wellbore (the zone having the least natural pressure or the highest permeability). In another approach, separate conduits are used between the injection source and each zone. This type of arrangement is shown in FIG.
1
.
FIG. 1
illustrates a wellbore
100
having casing
105
located therein with perforations
110
in the casing adjacent each of three separate zones of interest
115
,
120
,
125
. As is typical with a wellbore, a borehole is first formed in the earth and subsequently lined with casing. An annular area formed between the casing and the borehole is filled with cement (not shown) which is injected at a lower end of the wellbore. Some amount of cement typically remains at the bottom of the wellbore. The upper and intermediate zones are isolated with packers
130
and a lower end of one tubular string
135
,
140
,
145
terminates within each isolated zone. A steam generator
150
is located at the surface of the well and a simple choke
155
regulates the flow of the steam into each tubular. This method of individual tubulars successfully delivers a quantity of steam to each zone but regulation of the steam to each zone requires a separate choke. Additionally, the apparatus is costly and time consuming to install due to the multiple, separate tubular strings
135
,
140
,
145
.
More recently, a single tubular string has been utilized to carry steam in a single wellbore to multiple zones of interest. In this approach, an annular area between the tubular and the zone is isolated with packers and a nozzle located in the tubing string at each zone delivers steam to that zone. The approach suffers the same problems as other prior art solutions in that the amount of steam entering each zone is difficult to control and some zones, because of their higher natural pressure or lower permeability, may not receive any steam at all. While the regulation of steam is possible when a critical flow of steam is passed through a single nozzle or restriction, these devices are inefficient and a critical flow is not possible if a ratio of pressure in the annulus to pressure in the tubular becomes greater than 0.56. In order to ensure a critical flow of steam through these prior art devices, a source of steam at the surface of the well must be adequate to ensure an annulus/tubing pressure ratio of under 0.56.
Critical flow is defined as flow of a compressible fluid, such as steam, through a nozzle or other restriction such that the velocity at least one location is equal to the sound speed of the fluid at local fluid conditions. Another way to say this is that the Mach number of the fluid is 1.0 at some location. When the condition occurs, the physics of compressible fluids requires that the condition will occur at the throat (smallest restriction) of the nozzle. Once sonic velocity is reached at the throat of the nozzle, the velocity, and therefore the flow rate, of the gas through the nozzle cannot increase regardless of changes in downstream conditions. This yields a perfectly flat flow curve so long as critical flow is maintained.
Another disadvantage of the forgoing arrangements relates to ease of changing components and operating characteristics of the apparatus. Over time, formation pressures and permeability associated with different zones of a well change and the optimal amount (flow rate) and pressure of steam injected into these zones changes as well. Typically, a different choke or nozzle is required to change the characteristics (flow rate and steam quality) of the injected steam. Because the nozzles are an integral part of a tubing string in the conventional arrangements, changing them requires removal of the string, an expensive and time-consuming operation.
Another problem with prior art injection methods involves the distribution of steam components. Typically, steam generated at a well site for injection into hydrocarbon bearing formations is made up of a component of water and a component of vapor. In one example, saturated steam that is composed of 70 percent vapor and 30 percent water by mass is distributed to several steam injection wells. Because the vapor and water have different flow characteristics, it is common for the relative proportions of water and vapor to change as the steam travels down a tubular and through some type of nozzle. For example, it is possible to inadvertently inject mostly vapor into a higher formation while injecting mostly water into lower formations. Because the injection process relies upon an optimum mixture of steam components, changes in the relative proportions of water and vapor prior to entering the formations is a problem that affects the success of the injection job.
There is a need therefore, for an apparatus and method of injecting steam into multiple zones at a controlled flow rate in a single wellbore that is more efficient and effective than prior art arrangements. There is a further need for an injection apparatus with components that can be easily changed. There is a further need for an injection system that is simpler to install and remove. There is yet a further need to provide steam to multiple zones in a wellbore in predetermined proportions of water and vapor. There is
Howard William F.
Robinson Dudley L.
Schmidt Ronald W.
Sims Jackie C.
Bagnell David
Bomar Shane
Moser, Patterson & Sheridan L.L.P.
Weatherford / Lamb, Inc.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for injecting steam into a geological... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for injecting steam into a geological..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for injecting steam into a geological... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3199515