Television – Panoramic
Reexamination Certificate
2000-01-10
2001-11-06
Kelley, Chris (Department: 2713)
Television
Panoramic
C352S086000, C352S043000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06313865
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of film and video photography. In particular the present invention discloses a panoptic camera device that captures virtually all the light that converges on a single point in space.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Most cameras only record a small viewing angle. Thus, a typical conventional camera only captures an image in the direction that the camera is aimed. Such conventional cameras force viewers to look only at what the camera operator chooses to focus on. Some cameras use a specialized wide angle lens or “fish-eye” lens to capture a wider panoramic image. However, such panoramic cameras still have a relatively limited field.
In many situations, it would be much more desirable to have a camera system that captures light from all directions. For example, a conventional surveillance camera can be compromised by a perpetrator that approaches the camera from a direction that is not within the viewing angle of the camera. An ideal surveillance camera would capture light from all directions such that the camera would be able to record an image of a person that approaches the camera from any direction.
It would be desirable to have a camera system that would capture the light from all directions such that a full 360 degree panoramic image can be created. A full 360 degree panoramic image would allow the viewer to choose what she would like to look at. Furthermore, a full 360 degree panoramic image allows multiple viewers to simultaneously view the world from the same point, with each being able to independently choose their viewing direction and field of view.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention introduces a panoptic camera system that can be used to capture all the light from a hemisphere viewing angle. The panoptic camera comprises a main reflecting mirror that reflects light from an entire hemisphere onto an image capture mechanism. The main reflecting mirror consists of a paraboloid shape with a dimple on an apex. The surface area around the dimple allows the main reflector to capture light from behind an image capture mechanism or a second reflector. When two panoptic camera systems that capture the light from an entire hemisphere are placed back to back, a camera system that “sees” light from all directions is created.
A stereo vision panoramic camera system is also disclosed. The stereo vision panoramic camera system comprises two panoramic camera systems that are separated by a known distance. The two panoramic camera systems are each placed in a “blind spot” of the other panoramic camera system. By using the different images generated by the two panoramic camera systems and the known distance between the two panoramic camera systems, the range to objects within the panoramic images can be determined.
Other objects feature and advantages of present invention will be apparent from the company drawings and from the following detailed description that follows below.
REFERENCES:
patent: D. 263716 (1982-04-01), Globus et al.
patent: D. 312263 (1990-11-01), Charles
patent: 2146662 (1939-02-01), Van Albada
patent: 2244235 (1941-06-01), Ayres
patent: 2628529 (1953-02-01), Braymer
patent: 2654286 (1953-10-01), Cesar
patent: 3203328 (1965-08-01), Brueggemann
patent: 3205777 (1965-09-01), Brenner
patent: 3229576 (1966-01-01), Ress
patent: 3486809 (1969-12-01), Pinzone et al.
patent: 3785715 (1974-01-01), Mecklenborg
patent: 3832046 (1974-08-01), Mecklenborg
patent: 3934259 (1976-01-01), Krider
patent: 4012126 (1977-03-01), Rosendahl et al.
patent: 4017145 (1977-04-01), Jerie
patent: 4038670 (1977-07-01), Seitz
patent: 4058831 (1977-11-01), Smith
patent: 4078860 (1978-03-01), Globus et al.
patent: 4157218 (1979-06-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 4190866 (1980-02-01), Luknar
patent: 4241985 (1980-12-01), Globus et al.
patent: 4326775 (1982-04-01), King
patent: 4395093 (1983-07-01), Rosendahl et al.
patent: 4429957 (1984-02-01), King
patent: 4463380 (1984-07-01), Hooks, Jr.
patent: 4561733 (1985-12-01), Kreischer
patent: 4566763 (1986-01-01), Greguss
patent: 4568160 (1986-02-01), Krueger
patent: 4578682 (1986-03-01), Hooper et al.
patent: 4593982 (1986-06-01), Rosset
patent: 4602857 (1986-07-01), Woltz et al.
patent: 4656506 (1987-04-01), Ritchey
patent: 4661855 (1987-04-01), Gulck
patent: 4670648 (1987-06-01), Hall et al.
patent: 4728839 (1988-03-01), Coughlan et al.
patent: 4742390 (1988-05-01), Francke et al.
patent: 4751660 (1988-06-01), Hedley
patent: 4754269 (1988-06-01), Kishi et al.
patent: 4761641 (1988-08-01), Schreiber
patent: 4772942 (1988-09-01), Tuck
patent: 4858002 (1989-08-01), Zobel
patent: 4864335 (1989-09-01), Corrales
patent: 4868682 (1989-09-01), Shimizu et al.
patent: 4901140 (1990-02-01), Lang et al.
patent: 4907084 (1990-03-01), Nagafusa
patent: 4908874 (1990-03-01), Gabriel
patent: 4918473 (1990-04-01), Blackshear
patent: 4943821 (1990-07-01), Gelphman et al.
patent: 4943851 (1990-07-01), Lang et al.
patent: 4945367 (1990-07-01), Blackshear
patent: 4974072 (1990-11-01), Hasegawa
patent: 4985762 (1991-01-01), Smith
patent: 5016109 (1991-05-01), Gaylord
patent: 5021813 (1991-06-01), Corrales
patent: 5023725 (1991-06-01), McCutchen
patent: 5038225 (1991-08-01), Maeshima
patent: 5040055 (1991-08-01), Smith
patent: 5048102 (1991-09-01), Tararine et al.
patent: 5067019 (1991-11-01), Juday et al.
patent: 5068735 (1991-11-01), Tuchiya et al.
patent: 5083389 (1992-01-01), Alperin
patent: 5097325 (1992-03-01), Dill
patent: 5115266 (1992-05-01), Troje
patent: 5130794 (1992-07-01), Ritchey
patent: 5142354 (1992-08-01), Suzuki et al.
patent: 5153716 (1992-10-01), Smith
patent: 5166878 (1992-11-01), Polestra
patent: 5173948 (1992-12-01), Blackham et al.
patent: 5175808 (1992-12-01), Sayre
patent: 5185667 (1993-02-01), Zimmerman
patent: 5187571 (1993-02-01), Braun et al.
patent: 5189528 (1993-02-01), Takashima et al.
patent: 5200818 (1993-04-01), Neta et al.
patent: 5231673 (1993-07-01), Elenga
patent: 5259584 (1993-11-01), Wainwright
patent: 5262852 (1993-11-01), Eouzan et al.
patent: 5262867 (1993-11-01), Kojima
patent: 5305035 (1994-04-01), Schonherr et al.
patent: 5313306 (1994-05-01), Kuban et al.
patent: 5315331 (1994-05-01), Ohshita
patent: 5341218 (1994-08-01), Kaneko et al.
patent: 5359363 (1994-10-01), Kuban et al.
patent: 5384588 (1995-01-01), Martin et al.
patent: 5396583 (1995-03-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5422987 (1995-06-01), Yamada
patent: 5473474 (1995-12-01), Powell
patent: 5495576 (1996-02-01), Ritchey
patent: 5508734 (1996-04-01), Baker et al.
patent: 5539483 (1996-07-01), Nalwa
patent: 5563650 (1996-10-01), Polestra
patent: 5601353 (1997-02-01), Naimark et al.
patent: 5627675 (1997-05-01), Davis et al.
patent: 5631778 (1997-05-01), Powel
patent: 5649032 (1997-07-01), Burt et al.
patent: 5760826 (1998-06-01), Nayar
patent: 5877801 (1999-03-01), Martin et al.
patent: 5920337 (1999-07-01), Glassman et al.
patent: 1234341 (1960-05-01), None
patent: 2289820 (1995-11-01), None
Supplemental Information Disclosure Statement in re: the Application of Steven D. Zimmerman, et al. Application No. 08/662,410; 08 Pages including PTO 1449 Form citing 19 references. Application No. 08/662,410; Filed Jul. 12, 1996. Filed: Jul. 12, 1996.
Heckbert, P., “Survey of Texture Mapping” IEEE CG&A, Nov. 1986, pp. 56-67.
Defendants IPI's Notice of Reliance of Prior Art and Witnesses, Civil Action of Interactive Pictures Corporation, A/K/A Omniview, Inc. v. Infinite Pictures, Inc. and Bill Tillman, Case No. 3-96-849; 05 Pages. Filed: Dec. 08, 1997, in U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Tennessee.
Defendant IPI's Composit Exhibit List, Civil Action of interactive Pictures Corporation, F/K/A Omniview, Inc. v. Infinite Pictures, Inc. and Bill Tillman, Case No. 3-96-849. Filed: Jan. 05, 1998, in U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Tennessee. Pages: 20.
Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures, Civil Action of Interactive Pictures Corporation, F/K/A Omniview, Inc. v. Infinite Pictures, Inc. and Bill Tillman, Case No. 3-96-849; 31 Pages. Filed: Dec. 08, 1997, in U.S.D.C., Eastern District of Tennessee.
Plaintiff's
Driscoll Jr. Edward
Lomax Willard Curtis
Morrow Howard
An Shawn S.
Be Here Corporation
Curtis Daniel B.
Johnson Dag H.
Kelley Chris
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for implementing a panoptic camera system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for implementing a panoptic camera system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for implementing a panoptic camera system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2596494