Metal deforming – By use of tool acting during relative rotation between tool... – During rotation of work
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-07
2001-11-06
Larson, Lowell A. (Department: 3725)
Metal deforming
By use of tool acting during relative rotation between tool...
During rotation of work
C072S105000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06311533
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for forming features in cans. In particular, it relates to a method and apparatus for mechanically reshaping and/or forming textured features in the side wall of metal can bodies.
It is known for example from EP-0492860 that features such as flutes can be formed in the side wall of can bodies by rolling the can, supported on a hard profiled mandrel, along a flexible rail of polyurethane. In EP-0492860, the profile of the mandrel comprises a whole number of flutes which is less than the number of flutes on the finished can body.
EP-0731740 describes another apparatus for forming grooves such as flutes in a can side wall. The apparatus of this application uses a rail having hard profiled features, the can body being carried by a mandrel of softer resilient material such as polyurethane.
EP-0492860 also describes the use of a rail and mandrel, both of which are made from hard material. The rail is fixed in position and very fine clearance and accurate matching of forming depth between the mandrel and rail must be maintained for the flutes to be formed. It is not feasible to maintain these in practice due to the increase in temperature and machine and tool expansion which occur during normal running conditions. Typically a rise of up to 40° C. is found when operating at 500 cans/minute and a temperature rise of 50° C. has been found when operating a beader at 1500 cans/minute. Since compensation for this temperature rise is not possible, damage to the machine can occur.
A roll forming apparatus such as that described in EP-0492860 uses a rotating turret to carry a number of heads comprising profiled mandrels, each of which is rotatably mounted on the turret on shafts. As the turret rotates, the can bodies located on the profiled mandrels are engaged between a profiled mandrel and a profiled rail. The shafts of the mandrels are driven so that cans mounted on the mandrels are rolled along the rail. The radial position of the mandrels on the turret is set prior to operation. However, if there is mis-setting of the heads, this will lead to variation in the depth of profiles formed on the cans which may be unacceptable to the customer.
It should be noted that temperature rise leads primarily to turret growth and subsequent change in profile depth. This in turn will result in a change in can performance. If the heads have been incorrectly set, then the problem is exacerbated still further.
Another profile commonly provided for food cans is beading. Beading typically comprises one or more clusters of circumferential beads which improve can panel performance (i.e. radial strength when subjected to external pressure) particularly during thermal processing. Beads are generally formed by rolling the can body between a rotating mandrel and a fixed rail, or a pair of rotating mandrels. Both tools are independently mounted and located on separate assemblies. However, as the temperature of the machine and tooling increases during normal operation, the depth of the beads varies and cans with unacceptable bead depths made during the warm up period may be rejected. Conventional beaders have been found to exhibit up to 0.1 mm (0.004″) depth growth when hot. One beader, operating at 1500 cans/minute was found to exhibit up to 0.18 mm (0.007″) depth growth.
Variation in depth on beading machines has become more of an issue as the industry is continually striving to produces thinner lightweight cans. Previously, body thickness was high enough to absorb changes in bead/profile depth resulting from poor machine settings and temperature variation. This is no longer the case.
None of the prior art documents addresses or even recognises the problem of control of the depth of the profiled features formed in the can body. In particular, the problem of depth variability which will arise due to expansion of the machine and tooling in normal running, poorly set heads, or variability in thicknesses in the can body, has not been previously been addressed. This invention seeks to provide a solution to that problem.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention provides an apparatus for forming features in the side wall of cylindrical metal can bodies, the apparatus comprising: first and second tools formed from hard material and having complementary profiles, one of the tools being adapted to carry a can body; means for rolling the first tool relative to the second tool to deform the side wall of the can body between the tools; and a resilient mounting for the second tool for biasing the second tool towards the first.
By resiliently mounting the second tool, a series of cans may be formed with identical features of texture or shape, the features having constant depth or the same depth variations, depending on the desired profile. Unlike prior art apparatus, where the tools are independently mounted, in the present invention movement of the first tool is thus affected by movement of the resilient mounting of the second. Consistency between a series of cans, or different batches of cans can thus be guaranteed, irrespective of environmental conditions, can wall thickness, head to head variation etc. The depth is thus set by the tooling profile rather than by the relative position or spacing set between the tools as in known forming apparatus. In order that the second tool exerts a positive biasing force towards the first tool, the biasing load should exceed the forming load, i.e. the load exerted to deform the can side wall.
Usually, the tool which carries the can will be a mandrel. The other tool may be either a second mandrel or a rail. The second, resiliently mounted tool may either be provided by the tool carrying the can or by the cooperating tool in the form of a second mandrel or rail. When the second tool is a rail, this rail may be pivotally mounted. This is particularly useful since more than one can/mandrel may be on the rail at any one time.
In a preferred embodiment, each tool includes complementary unformed (unprofiled) regions such as plain edge bands between which the can body is clamped during forming. This clamping will support the can body in the unformed areas and spread the load over a larger area so as to prevent wrinkling or thinning of the can side wall. To avoid thinning in beading operations, the bead profile may also have to be adjusted. Tool to tool contact for clamping contrasts from, for example, known beaders where a gap between the tooling is always maintained so that there is no direct contact which could lead to pinching and localised thinning of the can wall.
Alternatively, in some texturing applications, where the textured features are not continuous along the length of the rail or around the circumference of the mandrel, the can body may be clamped between the tools in the regions which are not being formed.
Where clamping takes place beyond the edges of the profile only, the apparatus may further comprise means for adjusting the depth of the textured feature. Typically, this depth adjuster may comprise a spacer on a profiled rail for raising the clamped region relative to the profiled part of the rail. Where a secondary mandrel is used, a pair of rings may be used to adjust the depth. Depth adjustment may also be used to compensate for wear of tool parts.
A preferred embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which:
REFERENCES:
patent: 1965489 (1934-07-01), Coates
patent: 2407776 (1946-09-01), Gladfelter et al.
patent: 2899853 (1959-08-01), Prutton
patent: 4578976 (1986-04-01), Shulski et al.
patent: 5150594 (1992-09-01), Pazzaglia
patent: 5349837 (1994-09-01), Halasz
patent: 0731740 (1996-07-01), None
patent: 2251197 (1991-11-01), None
Knight Philip John
Monro Stuart Alexander
Crown Cork & Seal Technologies Corporation
Diller Ramik & Wight
Larson Lowell A.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for forming features in cans does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for forming features in cans, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for forming features in cans will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2609962