Method and apparatus for estimating a likelihood of shoulder...

Surgery – Diagnostic testing

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C128S920000, C702S019000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07963916

ABSTRACT:
A system and apparatus implementing a graphical user interface module for displaying information conveying a level of risk of delivery with shoulder dystocia associated to an obstetrics patient. The graphical user interface module displays a set of user modifiable information fields for allowing a user to enter a set of patient information data elements associated to the obstetrics patient. The graphical user interface module also displays a control allowing a user to cause the set of information data elements to be transmitted to a processing unit adapted to derive patient risk data at least in part on the basis of the set of information data elements, the patient risk data conveying a level of risk of delivery with shoulder dystocia. The graphical user interface module then displays the patient risk data with reference to risk assessment information.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6026526 (2000-02-01), Payman
patent: 6322504 (2001-11-01), Kirshner
patent: 6522098 (2003-02-01), Majumdar et al.
patent: 6620171 (2003-09-01), Vines
patent: 6684165 (2004-01-01), Peisner
patent: 6690958 (2004-02-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6695780 (2004-02-01), Nahum et al.
patent: 2003/0018520 (2003-01-01), Rosen
patent: 2004/110262 (2004-12-01), None
Langer et al. “Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing >= 4000 grams be delivered by caesarian section?”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1991. abstract only.
Pearson, James F. “Shoulder dystocia.” Current Obstetrics & Gynecology. vol. 6, Issue 1, Mar. 1996, pp. 30-34. abstract only.
Geary, Michael et al. “Shoulder Dystocia—Is It Predictable?”European Journal of Obstetrics&Gynecology and Reproductive Biology(1995) vol. 62, No. 1,pp. 15-18, XP 002354347.
Wolfe, Honor et al. “The Clinical Utility of Maternal Body Mass Index in Pregnancy”American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology(1991) vol. 164, No. 5, pp. 1306-1310, XP 009057068.
Mehta, S., et al. “Maternal Body Mass Index and Fetal Weight in Shoulder Dystocia.” SMFM Abstracts, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2003).
Rouse, DJ., et al. “The Effectiveness and Costs of Elective Cesarean Delivery for Fetal Macrosomia Diagnosed by Ultrasound.” JAMA (1996) vol. 276, No. 18, pp. 1480-1486.
Gherman, RB. “Shoulder Dystocia: An Evidence-Based Evaluation of the Obstetric Nightmare.” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology (2002) vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 345-362.
ACOG Practice Bulletin: “Shoulder Dystocia.” No. 40 (2002) (Replaces practice pattern No. 7, Oct. 1997).
Baskett, T. “Shoulder Dystocia.” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2002) vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 57-68.
Zylstra, S., et al. “Cutting the Medicolegal Risk of Shoulder Dystocia.” OBG Management (2004), pp. 78-98.
Gudmundsson, S., et al. “Correlation of birth injury with maternal height and birthweight.” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 111 (2004), pp. 1-4.
Hope, P., et al. “Fatal shoulder dystocia: A review of 56 cases reported . . . ”British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 105 (1998) pp. 1256-1261.
Office Action Mailed on Jul. 11, 2008 in Connection With U.S. Appl. No. 10/999,715, 12 Pages.
Office Action Mailed on Apr. 15, 2009 in Connection With U.S. Appl. No. 10/999,715, 13 Pages.
Partial European Search Report Completed on Nov. 16, 2005 in Connection With EP Patent Application No. 05 10 6762, 4 Pages.
Office Action Dated Jan. 2, 2007 in Connection With EP Patent Application No. 05 10 6752, 5 Pages.
Office Action dated May 18, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/999,715, 17 pages.
Jolly, et al., “Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: A study of 350,311 pregnancies”, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 111 (2003), pp. 9-14.
Van Wootten et al., “The prevalence of macrosomia in neonates of gestational diabetic mothers: analysis of risk factors”, Sep. 1999, abstract only, 1 page.
Pearson, James F., “Shoulder dystocia”, Current Obsterics & Gynecology, vol. 6, issue 1, Mar. 1996, abstract only, pp. 30-34.
Langer et al., “Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing >=4000 grams be delivered by caesarian section?”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991, abstract only, 4 pages.
Office Action of Feb. 17, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 05106762.7.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for estimating a likelihood of shoulder... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for estimating a likelihood of shoulder..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for estimating a likelihood of shoulder... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2721940

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.