Image analysis – Applications – 3-d or stereo imaging analysis
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-16
2004-01-06
Mehta, Bhavesh M. (Department: 2621)
Image analysis
Applications
3-d or stereo imaging analysis
C382S108000, C382S109000, C382S273000, C382S286000, C345S419000, C345S611000, C345S653000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06674894
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to data image processing and, more specifically, to generating enhanced digital images utilizing image segmentation processes that involve depth buffer information in association with point selection projection images.
The development of high resolution 3D (three-dimensional) imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and rotation X-ray CT angiography (XRCTA), have led to situations where high volumes of image data are generated in the study of individual patients. In many cases, such as in 3D magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and 3D CT angiography (CTA), the amount of detail per two-dimensional slice is small, but the high resolution detail of the full image volume is required in the diagnostic process. In one example, arterial beds are generally sparse, so there is typically a large amount of nonvascular image data present in a 3D angiographic image. As the resolution and volume coverage of MRA examinations have increased recently, having adequate means to effectively and efficiently review the available image information is a significant challenge for radiologists. Currently, there are three primary display techniques used for clinical evaluation of MRA data. The first technique is to display selected original cross-sectional MRA images. The second technique is to display oblique planar reformatted images. The last technique is to display a maximum intensity projection (MIP) image. The following discussion focuses mostly on MRA images; however, the discussion is equally applicable to other 3D angiography techniques such as CTA and XRCTA and to other volumetric visualization techniques in which selectable groups of image points are of interest.
The original cross-sectional images, also referred to as slices, contain the maximum amount of information on a local level. Each image displays the transverse segments and cross sections of vessels that intersect the plane of the image. Sometimes, the vascular detail of interest may be observed in a single image. More often, because of the intricate paths of the vessels, many images must be viewed, and the information from each image must be integrated to formulate an understanding of the structure of interest. This method is inefficient since it requires a single slice to be displayed, which slice contains very little global information about any single intricate vessel in the overall vascular network.
The oblique planar reformatted images provide improved efficiency over the original images by displaying image planes that follow a segment of a vessel of interest through the three-dimensional image data. Each individual image still provides only local information and a complete view of the vascular bed is not obtained. Volume rendering consists of the projection or rendering of an entire 3D image volume onto a single two-dimensional image. The volume is projected along parallel or diverging lines through the three-dimensional volume onto a two-dimensional image. The intensities along the projection line are transformed according to some specified transformation. Such rendering, in a variety of forms, has become very useful in assisting the observer in the rapid and efficient interpretation of the large amounts of image data originally obtained. A simple form of volume rendering, which is also intuitive, is an X-ray-like summation of the image densities or intensities. Initial attempts at MRA found that when the summation type of volume rendering was used, the background signal was too large to the point of masking a majority of vascular details during the summation process. The display capabilities were improved to the point where useful vascular details were observable when the rendering was performed by selecting only the maximum image value encountered along each projection line. This approach is known as the maximum intensity projection (MIP) algorithm and has been used in the development of a variety of MRA techniques. Other forms of volume rendering, such as assigning opacities and translucensies to certain image values or regions of image values, have been applied and found useful. However, the MIP algorithm is dominant because of its simplicity and consistency in generating quality images.
The MIP algorithm is successful to the extent that the signal from vessels is greater than the signal of the surrounding tissues. In regions where vessels do not appear overlapped, the MIP algorithm is sufficient to display vessels that are hyperintense relative to the variations in the overall background. Unfortunately, the MIP algorithm does not provide any information about vessels that are hidden below the intensity of other structures. Because of the sparseness of vessels, there is a significant amount of vessel detail that is not hidden and the MIP performs very well in increasing the amount of vessel detail observed in a single image.
Although there is a loss of information in a MIP image, the MIP algorithm provides a large amount of useful information in a single display. The information density, or information content per image element, is much higher in a MIP image than in the original 3D source data. In other words, although the source image data contains more total information, including some small arteries that would not appear in the MIP image, the density of vessel information in the source image data (i.e. the percentage of image elements associated with vessels) is lower than in the MIP image. As discussed later, many investigators have tried to develop algorithms to overcome the limitations of the MIP algorithm, and, although these have been viewed as improvements, the improvements have not been sufficient for any of these algorithms to replace the MIP algorithm. The advantages of the MIP algorithm typically outweigh the disadvantages found therein. These advantages include-reduced dynamic range, generally consistent image display, and improved signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR or contrast to noise ratio) for vessels that appear in the MIP. The artifacts in the MIP, although very real, are also well understood and can be “read through.”
The MIP display contains a large amount of global information about the vascular system. The appearance of a MIP image is quite similar to that of an X-ray angiogram, but there are several differences. The MIP simply selects the image element with the maximum intensity along each projection line, while the X-ray projection is a summation of all densitometric information along each projection line. The MIP image is therefore a flat display having no depth information and no information about the thickness of the vessel through which the projection line passed, while in X-ray angiography the vessel brightness or darkness depends directly on the length of the X-ray projection path through the vessel. Thus, in regions where several vessels are overlapping in the MIP image, it is difficult to resolve specific vessel segments. Further, because the signal intensity is not related to the projection path length through the vessel, an increase in vessel signal is not observed for foreshortened vessels. There are other limitations that exist in the MIP algorithm. Statistical nosie properties associated with the signal of the tissue background cause the signal level of the background in the MIP to increase with the projection volume thickness. Consequently, small vessels with signal levels that are slightly above the local background signal level may be lower than other background image elements along the projection line and, therefore, may not be observed in the MIP images. The limitations of the MIP can make it necessary to also review the original low information density cross-sectional images. When used in combination, the two display formats are a means for detecting and evaluating many types of vascular pathology. The review process, however, is rather time consuming, especially for complex cases.
Various attempts have been made to overcome the deficiencies that exist in the
Alexander Andrew L.
Chapman Brian E.
Parker Dennis L.
Roberts John A.
Kassa Yosef
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
Mehta Bhavesh M.
University of Utah Research Foundation
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for enhancing an image using data... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for enhancing an image using data..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for enhancing an image using data... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3209131