Electric heating – Microwave heating – Waveguide applicator
Reexamination Certificate
1999-08-11
2001-06-12
Leung, Philip H. (Department: 3742)
Electric heating
Microwave heating
Waveguide applicator
C219S695000, C219S746000, C333S230000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06246037
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
The invention relates to electromagnetic energy, and more particularly, to electromagnetic exposure of planar materials.
One drawback with conventional waveguides is that the microwave signal attenuates as it moves away from its source. This attenuation versus propagation distance increases when lossy planar materials are introduced into the waveguide. As a result, a material fed into the waveguide through a slot is heated more at one end of a segment (closer to a source) than at the other end (farther from a source). Prior art structures have not made use of the slot's orientation as a means for addressing this problem. In a traditional slotted waveguide, there is a field peak midway between two conducting surfaces. In the prior art, the slot is at this midway point. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,471,672, 3,765,425, and 5,169,571.
One way to address this drawback is disclosed in our co-pending and co-assigned application Ser. No. 08/848,244 now U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,275. Another way to address this drawback is disclosed in our co-pending and co-assigned application Ser. No. 09/350,991. In our two earlier applications, which are incorporated herein by reference, a path has a first conductive surface and a second conductive surface and a first end and a second end. A source is capable of generating an electromagnetic wave that propagates in a direction from the first end to the second end. The path has a slot that extends in a direction from the first end to the second end. The planar material is passed through the slot in a direction perpendicular to the propagation of the electromagnetic wave.
The structure disclosed in our two earlier applications is extremely useful for heating wider materials. In some applications, it may be advantageous to heat the material by passing the material in a direction parallel to the propagation of the electromagnetic wave. One possible way to heat a material by passing a material in a direction parallel to the propagation of the electromagnetic wave is disclosed in Metaxas et al, “Industrial Microwave Heating,” Peregrinus on behalf of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, United Kingdom, 1983 (hereinafter, referred to as “Metaxas”).
Referring now to
FIG. 1
, Metaxas discloses that a microwave power input
10
provides an electromagnetic wave (not shown) to a TE
10
waveguide
30
. The waveguide
30
has a miter bend
20
and rod supports
55
. A conveyor belt
50
passes through a choke
42
along a path that is halfway between the top conductive surface
31
and the bottom conductive surface
32
.
FIG. 2
further illustrates that “[t]he conveyor belt is supported at intervals so that the mid-depth plane of the workload is coincident with the mid-points of the broad faces of the waveguide[.]” Id. at
114
.
Miter bend
20
is usually referred to as a H-plane bend. In a H-plane bend, the long side a in
FIG. 2
remains in the same plane. In an E-plane bend, the short side b in
FIG. 2
remains in the same plane. In
FIG. 1
, the H-plane bend is oriented so that the electric field travels through the conveyor belt
50
.
There are at least six drawbacks with the wave applicator disclosed in Metaxas's book. The first drawback is that the microwave signal attenuates as it moves away from the microwave power input
10
. This attenuation versus propagation distance increases when lossy planar materials are introduced into the waveguide. As a result, a material fed into the waveguide
30
is heated more at the end of the waveguide closer to the input (end
33
) than at the other end (end
34
).
A second drawback is that the electric field is disrupted when the electric field travels through conveyor belt
50
. In addition, there is better coupling if the electric field sees a narrow dimension, as opposed to a wide dimension, of conveyor belt
50
. Metaxas fails to recognize that there is better coupling and the conveyor belt
50
is heated more uniformly if the electromagnetic wave travels across, as opposed to through, conveyor belt
50
.
A third drawback is that a traveling wave is used to heat the planar material. Metaxas specifies on page 114 that “[i]n some cases where the workload has a very high loss factor, the traveling wave applicator is terminated in a short circuit because there is only negligible residual power. ” Metaxas fails to recognize that it is possible to use a standing wave and continuously change the length or effective length of the waveguide or the frequency of the standing wave so as to even out the hot spots of the standing wave.
A fourth drawback is that the circular choke flange
42
is too wide at its widest point. Metaxas fails to recognize that a rectangular choke flange can limit the amount of energy that is lost through the opening.
A fifth drawback is that Metaxas does not disclose how to pass a planar material along more than one straight section of a serpentine waveguide. Metaxas specifies that “[a]t each end a miter bend (usually 90° E-plane) permits connection to the generator and terminating load. The miter plates of the bends have holes with cutoff waveguide chokes to permit the belt and workload to enter and leave the applicator.” Id. at 115. While Metaxas describes in the next section, meander (or serpentine) traveling wave applicators, Metaxas makes it clear that the material travels perpendicular to the long sections of the waveguide. Metaxas fails to recognize that it is possible to pass a material along (as opposed to across) multiple straight sections of a serpentine waveguide.
A sixth drawback is that in Metaxas it is not possible to heat just the edge of the planar material. In
FIGS. 1 and 2
, the entire conveyor belt
50
passes through the waveguide
30
. In some applications, it is either not necessary or it is detrimental to heat the entire planar material. There is a need for a device that can heat just the edge of a planar material.
SUMMARY
The present invention overcomes many of the problems associated with electromagnetic exposure of planar materials. According to one aspect of the invention, a path for a material passes through an opening and along a segment through an off-peak region of an electric field.
According to another aspect of the invention, an E-plane bend delivers an electromagnetic wave to the segment.
According to another aspect of the invention, a standing wave is used to heat the material. The peaks or valleys are pushed or pulled by a movable surface or by changing the frequency of the electromagnetic wave.
According to another aspect of the invention, a rectangular choke flange is used at the opening to the segment.
According to another aspect of the invention, a curved segment connects the segment to another segment for heating the material.
According to another aspect of the invention, a segment is used to heat just the edge of a planar material.
An advantage of the invention is that it is possible to uniformly heat the material at different points along the segment. Another advantage is that it is possible to improve coupling and decrease disruption of the electric field. Another advantage is that a standing wave is more efficient than a traveling wave. the energy loss associated with traveling waves is avoided. Another advantage is that it is possible to decrease the amount of electromagnetic energy that escapes through the opening. Another advantage is that it is possible to provide extended heating despite space constraints. Another advantage is that is possible to heat just the edge of a material.
REFERENCES:
patent: Re. 32664 (1988-05-01), Osepchuk et al.
patent: 2467230 (1949-04-01), Revercomb et al.
patent: 2549511 (1951-04-01), Nelson
patent: 2650291 (1953-08-01), Kinn
patent: 3471672 (1969-10-01), White
patent: 3474209 (1969-10-01), Parker
patent: 3622732 (1971-11-01), Williams
patent: 3622733 (1971-11-01), Smith
patent: 3632945 (1972-01-01), Johnson
patent: 3666905 (1972-05-01), Muller et al.
patent: 3761665 (1973-09-01), Nagao et al.
patent: 3765425 (1973-10-01), Stungis et al.
paten
Drozd J. Michael
Joines William T.
Burns Doane Swecker & Mathis L.L.P.
Industrial Microwave Systems, Inc.
Leung Philip H.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for electromagnetic exposure of planar... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for electromagnetic exposure of planar..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for electromagnetic exposure of planar... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2453678