Telephonic communications – Echo cancellation or suppression
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-21
2004-11-02
Tieu, Binh (Department: 2643)
Telephonic communications
Echo cancellation or suppression
C379S406050, C370S286000, C370S289000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06813351
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates in general to echo cancellation, and in particular to the suppression of echo leak through in the output of an echo canceller by improved near end speech pause determination.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Echo cancellers are commonly used in full duplex telephony systems to remove undesirable echo signals that would otherwise be included in an output signal. The undesirable echo signal is a far end audio signal that has been modified by a system that introduces either acoustic echo or electric echo and other undesirable inputs, such as background noise. Such telephony systems include telephone handsets operating in an acoustic environment of speaker and microphone coupling, telephone 4 to 2 wire and 2 to 4 wire hybrid audio signal converters, and such systems are generically referred to as echo generating systems. The far end signal, or the echo-generating signal, is alternatively called a reference signal
105
.
Referring to
FIG. 1
, a functional block diagram of a telephony system
100
that incorporates a conventional echo canceller
150
is shown. The echo canceller
150
includes a synthetic echo generator
125
that has a linear adaptive filter that attempts to mimic the echo generating system
110
that is causing the echoing of the reference signal
105
. The reference signal
105
is modified by the echo generating system
110
, resulting in an undesirable (far end with echo) signal. A near end signal
115
(for example a speech signal from a telephone handset microphone) is added to the undesirable signal, resulting in a near-end-plus-far end echo signal
120
that is also known to those of ordinary skill in the art as the desired signal
120
. The reference signal
105
is also coupled to an input of the echo canceller
150
that is coupled to the synthetic echo generator
125
. A signal called a synthetic echo signal
126
, that is an approximation of the undesirable (echo) signal, is generated from the far end signal by the synthetic echo generator
125
via adaptive filtering. This synthetic echo signal
126
is subtracted by a difference function
127
of the echo canceller
150
from the desired signal
120
, generating an echo cancelled version of the desired signal, also known in the art as an error signal
135
(because during times when there is no near end speech, this signal should be at minimum levels). Since this linear operation is not completely effective, for several reasons, residual echo components remain in the echo cancelled error signal
135
. One significant reason is that the echo generating system
110
may be non-linear.
An approach to improving the performance of echo cancellation, especially when echo generating consists of a large non-linear component, is to reduce the residual echo components during times when there is no speech input at the near end, because the residual components occurring during these times, called echo leak-throughs, are very noticeable. So, some conventional echo cancellation techniques make a determination of when a pause (or longer cessation) in near end speech occurs, and perform some type of non-linear operation by switching the output so that the output, called herein the leak through output, is either greatly reduced or the output is replaced entirely by internally generated noise known in the art as comfort noise. Comfort noise is used to reduce echo because complete silence on the output is uncomfortable to listeners at the far end.
But because of the non-linear nature of the echo generation system, echo cancellers will sometimes make an incorrect decision as to whether there is a valid pause in the near-end signal. With such an incorrect decision, either a valid echo cancelled near-end signal is mistakenly replaced by comfort noise or the echo-cancelled signal is passed through during a pause in near end audio. Either event results in undesirable signals occurring in the leak-through suppressed signal. This negative aspect of echo cancellation can still be annoying to a far end listener.
In the technique of switching to comfort noise during pauses, the synthetic echo generator
125
makes a determination from the error signal
135
as to when there is a pause or a longer cessation of the reference signal
105
, and a control signal
131
, is generated and used to select the output
171
of the echo canceller
150
(which is also the output of the telephony system
100
) as being either the error signal
135
or an output of a comfort noise source
140
by means of a switch function
170
. The control signal
131
is commonly used in conventional echo cancellers and is described herein as a center clipper signal. The center clipper signal
131
is typically generated based on an echo return loss (ERL) parameter derived from the linear adaptive filter, and although the use of the center clipper signal
131
does improve the performance of echo cancellation, in conventional echo cancellers
135
the use of the center clipper signal
131
still allows noticeable echo leak throughs because of non-linear echo generating systems
110
, so the output
171
of the echo canceller
150
is called the leak-through output. The technique of attenuating the echo leak through during pauses is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,512, issued to Nasu on Apr. 13, 1999. Nasu's technique operates to attenuate what he calls peripheral noise, which can be echo and/or background noise when the power of the near end signal is less than the power of the reference signal, by attenuating the output signal.
These techniques, while quite effective in many situations, still leave some echo leak through as described above, so what is needed is a more effective echo leak through reduction technique that reduces echo leak through more accurately and completely than available techniques.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5475731 (1995-12-01), Rasmusson
patent: 5563944 (1996-10-01), Hasegawa
patent: 5894513 (1999-04-01), Nasu
patent: 6167133 (2000-12-01), Caceres et al.
patent: 6438225 (2002-08-01), Tahernezhaadi
patent: 6597787 (2003-07-01), Lindgren et al.
Motorola Inc.
Tieu Binh
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for echo cancellation that suppresses... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for echo cancellation that suppresses..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for echo cancellation that suppresses... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3313490