Method and apparatus for debugging and tuning a process control

Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Generic control system – apparatus or process – Having preparation of program

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

700 2, 700 11, 700 52, 700 88, 709102, 709201, 710260, 710261, G05B 1942

Patent

active

060443057

DESCRIPTION:

BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to process control networks and, more specifically, to a method and apparatus for use in debugging and tuning a process control network having distributed control functions.


DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

Large processes such as chemical, petroleum and other manufacturing and refining processes include numerous field devices disposed at various locations to measure and control process parameters to thereby effect control of the process. These field devices may be, for example, sensors such as temperature, pressure, and flow rate sensors as well as control elements such as valves and switches. Historically, the process control industry used manual operations like manually reading level and pressure gauges, turning valve wheels, etc., to operate the measurement and control field devices within a process. Beginning in the 20th century, the process control industry began using local pneumatic control, in which local pneumatic controllers, transmitters, and valve positioners were placed at various locations within a process plant to effect control of certain plant elements. With the emergence of the microprocessor-based distributed control system (DCS) in the 1970's, distributed electronic process control became prevalent in the process control industry.
As is known, a DCS includes an analog or a digital computer, such as a programmable logic controller, connected to numerous electronic monitoring and control devices, such as electronic sensors, transmitters, current-to-pressure transducers, valve positioners, etc. located throughout a process. The DCS computer stores and implements a centralized and, frequently, complex control scheme to effect measurement and control of process parameters according to some overall control scheme. Usually, however, the control scheme implemented by a DCS is proprietary to the DCS manufacturer which, in turn, makes the DCS difficult and expensive to expand, upgrade, reprogram, and service because the DCS provider must become involved in an integral way to perform any of these activities. Furthermore, the equipment that can be used by or connected to any particular DCS may be limited due to the proprietary nature of DCS and the fact that a DCS provider may not support certain devices or functions of devices manufactured by other vendors.
To overcome some of the problems inherent in the use of proprietary DCSs, the process control industry has developed a number of standard, open communication protocols including, for example, the HART.RTM., PROFIBUS.RTM., WORLDFIP.RTM., LONWORKS.RTM., Device-Net.RTM., and CAN protocols, which enable field devices made by different manufacturers to be used together within the same process control loop. In fact, any field device that conforms to one of these protocols can be used within a process to communicate with and to be controlled by a DCS or other controller that supports the protocol, even if that field device is made by a different manufacturer than the DCS controller manufacturer.
Moreover, there is now a move within the process control industry to decentralize process control and, thereby, simplify DCS controllers or eliminate the need for DCS controllers to a large extent. Decentralized control is obtained by having process control devices, such as valve positioners, transmitters, etc. perform one or more process control functions and by then communicating data across a bus structure for use by other process control devices. To implement control functions, each process control device includes a microprocessor having the capability to perform one or more basic control functions as well as the ability to communicate with other process control devices using a standard and open communication protocol. In this manner, field devices made by different manufacturers can be interconnected within a process control loop to communicate with one another and to perform one or more process control functions or control loops without the intervention of a DCS. The all digital, two-wire

REFERENCES:
patent: 4271505 (1981-06-01), Menot et al.
patent: 4627045 (1986-12-01), Olson et al.
patent: 4691328 (1987-09-01), Sterling, Jr. et al.
patent: 4831558 (1989-05-01), Shoup et al.
patent: 4918690 (1990-04-01), Markkula, Jr. et al.
patent: 4955305 (1990-09-01), Garnier et al.
patent: 4974625 (1990-12-01), Paullus et al.
patent: 4976144 (1990-12-01), Fitzgerald
patent: 5014185 (1991-05-01), Saito et al.
patent: 5023869 (1991-06-01), Grover et al.
patent: 5109692 (1992-05-01), Fitzgerald
patent: 5148433 (1992-09-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5193189 (1993-03-01), Flood et al.
patent: 5197328 (1993-03-01), Fitzgerald
patent: 5404524 (1995-04-01), Celi, Jr.
patent: 5434774 (1995-07-01), Seberger et al.
patent: 5439021 (1995-08-01), Burlage et al.
patent: 5451923 (1995-09-01), Seberger et al.
patent: 5469150 (1995-11-01), Sitte
patent: 5469548 (1995-11-01), Callison et al.
patent: 5485455 (1996-01-01), Dobbins et al.
patent: 5530643 (1996-06-01), Hodorowski
patent: 5550980 (1996-08-01), Pascucci et al.
patent: 5558115 (1996-09-01), Lenz et al.
patent: 5573032 (1996-11-01), Lenz et al.
patent: 5592622 (1997-01-01), Isfeld et al.
patent: 5631825 (1997-05-01), van Weele et al.
patent: 5650777 (1997-07-01), Westfield et al.
patent: 5684451 (1997-11-01), Seberger et al.
Fieldbus Foundation Manual, Communications Technical Specification and User Layer Technical Specification, 1994-1997, including Fieldbus Message Specification FF-870-1.1; Physical Layer Conformance Testing FF-830 FS 1.0; Device Description Language FF-900-1.0; Function Blocks (Part 1) FF-890-1.2; Fieldbus Access Sublayer FF-875-1.1; Function Blocks (Part 2) FF-891-1.2; Data Link Protocol FF-822-1.1; System Management FF-880-1.1; Communication Profile FF-940-1.0; Transducer Blocks (Part 1) FF-902 Rev PA 2.0; Transducer Blocks (Part 2) FF-903-Rev PS 2.0; Data Link Services FF-821-1.0; 31.25 kbits/s Physical Layer Profile FF-816-1.0; Network Management FF-801-1.1; and System Architecture FF-800-1.0.
"FIELDVUE.RTM. ValveLink.TM. Series VL2000 Software," Fisher-Rosemount Bulletin 62.1: VL2000, pp. 1-6 (Nov. 1995).
"FIELDVUE.RTM. VL2000 Series Software User Guide," Fisher Controls, Version 2.0 (Jun. 1996).
"FIELDVUE.RTM. Digital Valve Controller Type DVC5000 Series," Fisher-Rosemount Bulletin 62.1:DVC5000, pp. 1-12 (Jun. 1994).
"FIELDVUE.TM. Digital Valve Controller DVC5000 Series Remotely Accessible Information," Fisher Controls Bulletin 62.1:DVC5000(S1), pp. 1-2 (Jun. 1994).
"FIELDVUE.TM. Digital Valve Controller Type DVC5000 Series," Fisher Controls Form 5335, pp. 1-35 and Errata Sheet (Jun. 1994).
Fisher-Rosemount Systems, "Fieldbus Technical Overview Understanding Foundation.TM. Fieldbus Technology," 27 pages, 1997.
"FOUNDATION.TM. Specification, Function Block Application Process," Part 3, 155 pages, 1995-1996.
Fieldbus Foundation.TM., "Technical Overview," FD-043 Revision 1.0, 29 pages, 1996.
Fromberger, "Feldbusfahige, intelligente Sensoren," Messen und Pr.rho.fen, vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 332, 334-340, 1991.
Watt, "The Double-Distributed Control Network," Thesis submitted to Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. (Jan. 1984).
Zielinski et al., "Asset Management Using Fieldbus," Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc, pp. 1-14 (1997).
"Advanced Systems Simplify Control," Machine Design, vol. 68, No. 12, pp. 118, 120 (Jul. 11, 1996).
Black, "Combining Lan Technology with Smart Sensors to Provide Predictive Maintenance, Diagnostics and Alarm Systems," Proceedings of the Industrial Computing Conference, Chicago, vol. 3, Sep. 19, 1993, Industrial Computing Society/Instrument Society of America, pp. 345-354 (1993).
Zielinski, "Issues for Digital Field Instrument Networks," INTECH, pp. 92-94 (1989).
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US 97/17343 mailed Jan. 25, 1998.
Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 1997, issued in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/726,263.
PCT Written Opinion issued in PCT application PCT/US97/17343 dated Jul. 9, 1998.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for debugging and tuning a process control does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for debugging and tuning a process control , we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for debugging and tuning a process control will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1334456

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.