Land vehicles – Wheeled – Attachment
Reexamination Certificate
1999-04-21
2001-07-03
Swann, J. J. (Department: 3611)
Land vehicles
Wheeled
Attachment
C280S743100, C280S735000, C280S731000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06254130
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention generally relates to a method and apparatus for controlling air bag deployment. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus that can be used to limit the physical extent of air bag deployment.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Passive restraint devices known as air bags frequently are used in automobiles to reduce occupant (driver or passenger) injuries and/or fatalities that result from vehicular accidents. As is known in the art, air bag restraint systems restrain forward movement of the occupant to protect him or her from contact with the interior of the vehicle by instantaneously inflating to cushion the occupant. Generally speaking, air bag systems comprise an inflater for releasing a gas (e.g., nitrogen), a bag to be inflated by the released gas, a housing enclosing the inflater and the bag, a sensor detecting a collision of greater than a predetermined magnitude, and a control system that transmits a signal to the inflater to activate inflation of the bag. When the gas is released from the inflater, it fills the bag to exert an inner pressure upon the interior walls of the bag, which urges the bag to inflate.
Ironically, although air bags are intended to prevent injuries, air bags themselves can cause occupant injuries and even fatalities, especially when the occupant is relatively small or frail (e.g., children, the elderly). The primary reason for these injuries, is the high speed and pressure at which such air bags deploy (e.g., 200 mph, 34 psi) as well as the particular part of the person's body that impacts the air bag. Normally, it is the face and neck of such an occupant that bears the brunt of this impact.
In response to the occurrence of such injuries, several manufacturers have begun development of so-called “smart” air bags. Generally speaking, smart air bags use some form of sensing device to determine certain physical characteristics of a vehicle occupant that is to be cushioned by the bag if the vehicle were involved in an accident. For example, if it is determined by the sensing device that the occupant is small in size and/or weight, the air bag is either temporarily disabled or is adjusted to inflate with less force to avoid injuring the occupant. Although such smart air bags may prevent typical air bag injuries, their use could permit more common vehicular injuries to occur. In the case of the temporarily disabled air bag, no buffer whatsoever is provided between the occupant and the vehicle interior to cushion the occupant. As for the less forcefully deploying air bag, it is possible that inflation may not occur quickly enough to fully cushion the occupant, or that the air bag may not inflate to the degree necessary to fully protect the occupant.
From the above, it can be appreciated that it would be desirable to have a method and apparatus for controlling air bag deployment that provides for complete cushioning of the occupant in a vehicular accident with less risk of occupant injury caused by the air bag's deployment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an air bag control system. The system comprises a restraining apparatus adapted to be connected to an occupant side of an air bag, an extension/retraction device used to adjust the degree to which the restraining apparatus can be extended, and a control device for controlling extension and retraction of the extension/retraction device. In operation, the restraining apparatus can be retracted by the extension/retraction device in response to a signal sent by the control device to limit the physical extent to which the air bag can deploy to prevent injury of a vehicle occupant adjacent the air bag.
In a preferred arrangement, the system further comprises a sensing device which senses at least one physical characteristic of the occupant to be cushioned by the air bag. A signal then can be sent from the sensing device to the control device such that the determination can be made as to whether, and to what degree, to restrict deployment of the air bag. By way of example, the sensing device can be adapted to determine the weight, size, and/or position of the occupant.
The objects, features, and advantages of this invention will become apparent upon reading the following specification, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is intended that all such additional features and advantages be included therein with the scope of the present invention, as defined by the claims.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5073418 (1991-12-01), Thornton et al.
patent: 5165716 (1992-11-01), Imai et al.
patent: 5236775 (1993-08-01), Swoboda et al.
patent: 5358273 (1994-10-01), Onishi et al.
patent: 5362101 (1994-11-01), Sugiura et al.
patent: 5547215 (1996-08-01), Taguchi et al.
patent: 5554424 (1996-09-01), Krummheuer et al.
patent: 5573270 (1996-11-01), Sogi et al.
patent: 5637114 (1997-06-01), Hohnke
patent: 5722686 (1998-03-01), Blackburn et al.
patent: 5732375 (1998-03-01), Cashler
patent: 5887894 (1999-03-01), Castagner et al.
patent: 5957490 (1999-09-01), Sinnhuber
patent: 6018693 (2000-01-01), Blackburn et al.
patent: 6056079 (2000-05-01), Cech et al.
patent: 6076854 (2000-06-01), Schenck et al.
patent: 6092838 (2000-07-01), Walker
Keshavaraj, et al., “Analysis of Fabrics Used in Passive Restraint Systems-Airbags,” J. Text. Inst., 1996, 87, Part 1, No. 3, Textile Institute, pp. 554-571.
Weiss, “Curbing Air Bags' Dangerous Excesses New Smarts, New Sensors, and Variable Inflation Could Reduce Injury and Death,” Science News, vol. 154, Sep. 26, 1998, pp. 206-207.
“Passive Safety,” Focus, Automotive Engineering, Nov. 1997, pp. 43-54.
“Smashing Performer,” Automotive Engineering Safety, Mar. 1998, pp. 29-30.
“Protect and Survive,” Automotive Engineering: Safety, Jul. 1996, pp. 46-47.
Conlee, “Passenger Side Air Bag System for Open Interior Architecture,” pp. 19-22.
“Focus On . . . Passive Safety,” Automotive Engineering: Focus, Oct./Nov. 1996, pp. 42-54.
Morton, “In the Bag,” Automotive Engineering: Passive Safety, Jul./Aug. 1998, pp. 45-47.
Martin, “Adaptive Airbags Coming: Takata's Smart Strategy Tailors Airbag Performance to Occupant Size, Seating Position, and Crash Situation,” AI, Mar. 1997, p. 87.
Kobe, “Smart Airbags: Automakers and Safety Groups Agree that ‘Smart’ Airbag Technology Will Save Lives—The Key Question is When,” AI, Jan. 1997, pp. 62-63.
Visnic, “Smart Bags for Dumb Drivers: Safety System Suppliers Race to Improve Sagging Image,” WARD's Auto World, Feature/Safety Engineering, Apr. 1997, pp. 33-36.
Keenan, “Industry to NHTSA: Power Down on Airbags,” WARD's Auto World, Feature/Safety Testing, Nov. 1996, pp. 47-48.
“New-Car Dealers Join National Effort to Improve Vehicle Air Bag Safety,” http://www.nadanet.com
ews/112296.htm, Press Release, Nov. 22, 1996, p. 1.
Keshavarij, et al., “Airbag Fabric Material Modeling of Nylon and Polyester Fabrics Using a Very Simple Neural Network Architecture,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 60, 1996, pp. 2329-2338.
Keshavaraj, et al., “A Realistic Comparison of Biaxial Performance of Nylon 6,6 and Nylon 6 Fabrics Used in Passive Restraints-Airbags,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 61, 1996, pp. 1541-1552.
Gopalsamy Chandramohan
Jayaraman Sundaresan
Park Sungmee
Rajamanickam Rangaswamy
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
Shriver J. Allen
Swann J. J.
Thomas Kayden Horstemeyer & Risley, L.L.P.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for controlling air bag deployment does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for controlling air bag deployment, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for controlling air bag deployment will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2436742