Aeronautics and astronautics – Aircraft sustentation – Sustaining airfoils
Reexamination Certificate
2002-06-12
2003-11-25
Swiatek, Robert P. (Department: 3644)
Aeronautics and astronautics
Aircraft sustentation
Sustaining airfoils
C244S204000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06651935
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to control of shock/boundary-layer interactions caused by supersonic airflow, and more particularly to configurations and actuation of flaps used in control of shock/boundary-layer interactions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Shockwaves are encountered when an aircraft reaches supersonic airspeeds. Such shockwaves exert significant forces on the thin layer of air around the aircraft, a component referred to as the boundary layer. These shockwaves interact with the boundary layer and, during strong interactions, can cause the boundary layer to be degraded, and may also induce high levels of flow separation. These undesired boundary layer interactions accordingly bring about safety, performance, and longevity concerns, especially when the interactions occur inside of engine inlets.
Systems for alleviating such interactions have been developed. These systems bleed air near the boundary layer to suppress shockwave induced flow separation and improve overall flow uniformity. Active transpiration systems require some sort of ducting and/or pumping to bleed the air, which occupies valuable space, and increases the overall weight and cost of the vehicle.
One alternative to boundary layer bleed is to use cavity recirculation. This passive transpiration control method consists of a porous surface and a cavity underneath. The porous surface can be made of holes or slots. During supersonic flight, the changes in pressure will cause air downstream of the shock impingement to flow into the holes, through the cavity and then out through the holes upstream of the impingement. These systems have reduced mechanical complexity and expense compared to the conventional active transpiration systems. However, present models for passive transpiration systems have disadvantages. Transpiration rates are typically insufficient for effective boundary layer control due to the hole aerodynamics. For example, holes or slots that are normal to the surface create a geometry that is significantly less effective than angled holes for bleeding purposes. Further, the holes can yield increased drag at lower Mach speeds or subsonic air flight because of their continuous open state. This potential leads to the same design concerns experienced in needing to determine the location of shock boundary interaction in a particular aircraft so the holes can be limited to that area. Otherwise, drag losses become too significant.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to an apparatus for controlling shock/boundary-layer interactions created by a supersonic shock on a surface of a structure. The apparatus includes a cavity formed in the structure and having an opening on the surface. A plate is attached to the surface and covers the opening. A plurality of flaps are formed on the plate and is operable to cooperatively close the opening in response to subsonic airflow condition over the flaps, and open the opening to permit airflow through the cavity in response to supersonic airflow conditions over the flaps.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2646945 (1953-07-01), Perry
patent: 2959377 (1960-11-01), Kaplan
patent: 5971327 (1999-10-01), Loth
patent: 6009166 (1999-12-01), Polito et al.
patent: 6109565 (2000-08-01), King, Sr.
L. Bahi, J.M. Ross and H.T. Nagamatsu, “Passive Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Control for Transonic Airfoil Drag Reduction”, pp. 1-11, AIAA 21stAerospace Sciences Meeting. Jan. 10-13, 1983/Reno, Nevada.
S. Raghunathan, and D.G. Mabey, “Passive Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Control on a Wall-Mounted Model”, AIAA Journal, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 275-278, Feb. 1987.
S. Raghunathan, “Passive Control of Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction”, Prog. Aerospace Sci., vol. 25, pp. 271-296, 1988.
S. Raghunathan, and S.T. Mcllwain, “Further Investigations of Transonic Shock-Wave Boundary-Layer Interaction with Passive Control ”, J. Aircraft, vol. 27, No. 1 pp. 60-65, Jan. 1990.
Reynald Bur, Bernard Corbel, and Jean Delery, “Study of Pssive Control in a Transonic Shock/Wave Boundary-Layer Interaction”, AIAA Journal, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 394-400, Mar. 1998.
Reynald Bur, Richard Benay, Bernard Corbel, and Jean Delery, “Physical Study of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control in Transonic Flow”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 38thAerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Jan. 10-13, 2000/Reno, Nevada, pp. 1-11.
D.C. McCormick, “Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control with Vortex Generators and Passive Cavity”, AIAA Journal, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 91-96, Jan. 1993.
Y.L. Lin, M.J. Rimlinger,T.I-P. Shih, and B.P. Willis, “Control of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions with Passive Blowing and Bleeding”, 33rdAIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Jul. 6-9, 1997, Seattle, WA, pp. 1-9.
Derek L. Gefroh, Everett S. Hafenrichter, Barry M. Ford, J. Craig Dutton, Stephen T. Mcllwain, Eric Loth, “Experimental Study of Mesoflaps for SBLI Control”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 38thAerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Jan. 10-13, 2000, Reno, Nevada, pp. 1-15.
Brett Wood, E. Loth, P. Geubelle, and S. Mcllwain, “A Numerical Methodology for an Aeroelastic SBLI Flow”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 38thAerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Jan. 10-13, 2000, Reno, Nevada, pp. 1-15.
Derek L. Gefroh, Everett S. Hafenrichter, Stephen T. Mcllwain, Eric Loth, J. Craig Dutton, and Philippe H. Geubelle, “Simulation and Experimental Analysis of a Novel SBLI Flow Control System”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Fluids 2000, Jun. 19-22, 2000, Denver, CO. pp. 1-15.
V. A. Amatucci, J.C. Dutton, D.W. Kuntz and A.L. Addy, “Two Stream, Supersonic, Wake Flowfield Behind a Thick Base, Part I: General Features”, AIAA Journal, vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 2039-2046, Aug. 1992.
B.F. Carroll, J.C. Dutton, and A.L. Addy, “NOZCS2: A Computer Program for the Design of Continuous Slope Supersonic Nozzles”, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Aug. 1986.
Bruce F. Carroll and J. Craig Dutton, “Characteristics of Multiple Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interactions in Rectangular Ducts”, J. Propulsion, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 186-193, Mar.-Apr. 1990.
Juan Gabriel Santiago, and J. Craig Dutton, “Velocity Measurements of a Jet Injected into a Supersonic Crossflow”, Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 264-273, Mar.-Apr. 1997.
J.L. Herrin, J.C. Dutton, “An Investigation of LDV velocity bias correction techniques fof high-speed separated flows”, Experiments in Fluids 14, 354-363 (1993).
E. Loth, “Smart Mesoflaps for Control of Shock Boundary Layer Interactions”, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp. 1-11, 2000.
Everett S. Hafenrichter, Yeol Lee, Stephen T. Mcllwain, J. Craig Dutton, Eric Loth, “Experimental Investigation of Normal Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction Control Using Aeroelastic Mesoflaps”, pp. 12-24, 2001.
Martin J. Orphanides, Everett S. Hafenrichter, Yeol Lee, J. Craig Dutton, Eric Loth, and Stephen T. Mcllwain, “Shock-Position Sensitivity and Performance of SBLI Passive-Control Methods”, pp. 1-15, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 19thAIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Jun. 11-14, 2001, Anaheim, California.
J. Couldrick, S. Gai, J. Milthorpe, and K. Shankar, “Swept Shock/Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction Control with “Smart” Flap Actuators”, pp. 1-9, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 40thAIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Jan. 14-17, 2002, Reno, Nevada.
Brett Wood, Eric Loth, and Philippe Geubelle, “Simulation of Aeroelastic Mesoflaps for Shock/Boundary Layer Interaction”, pp. 1-24, submitted to Journal of Fluid & Structres, Apr. 3, 2000.
Derek Gefroh, Eric Loth, Craig Dutton, and Everett Hafenrichter, “Design Evolution of Aeroelastic Mesoflaps for Control of Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction”, pp. 1-26, Submitted to Journal of Fluids & Structures, Aug. 21, 2001.
Eric Loth, Scott White, and Andrew Alleyne, “Smart Materials for Mesoflap Bleed a
Alleyne Andrew G.
Davis David
Dutton J. Craig
Geubelle Philippe H.
Loth Eric
Greer Burns & Crain Ltd.
Swiatek Robert P.
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for control of shock/boundary-layer... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for control of shock/boundary-layer..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for control of shock/boundary-layer... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3161733