Method and apparatus for continuously testing a well

Wells – Processes – Sampling well fluid

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C166S250010, C166S373000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06457521

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND
This invention relates to methods and apparatus for testing wells.
After a wellbore has been drilled, testing (e.g., drillstem testing or production testing) may be performed to determine the nature and characteristics of one or more zones of a formation before the well is completed. Characteristics that are tested for include the permeability of a formation, volume, pressure, skin, and temperature of a reservoir in the formation, fluid content of the reservoir, and other characteristics. To obtain the desired data, fluid samples may be taken as well as measurements made with downhole sensors and other instruments.
One type of testing that may be performed is a conventional drillstem test. A drillstem test is a test taken through the drillstem by means of special testing equipment attached to the drillstem. The special equipment, which may include pressure and temperature sensors and fluid identifiers, determines if fluid components in commercial quantities have been encountered in the wellbore. The fluid components are normally then produced to the surface and are either flared or transported to storage containers. Producing the fluid components to the surface at the testing stage, and particularly flaring the fluid components at the surface, creates a potential environmental hazard and is quickly becoming a discouraged practice.
Another type of testing that may be performed is a closed-chamber drillstem test. In a closed-chamber test, the well is closed in at the surface when producing from the formation under test. Instruments may be positioned downhole and at the surface to make measurements. One advantage offered by closed-chamber testing is that hydrocarbons and other well- fluids are not produced to the surface during the test. This alleviates some of the environmental concerns associated with having to burn off or otherwise dispose of hydrocarbons that are produced to the surface. However, conventional closed-chamber testing is limited in its accuracy and completeness due to limited flow of fluids from the formation under test. The amount of fluids that can be produced from the zone under test may be limited by the volume of the closed chamber.
A further issue associated with testing a well is communication of test results to the surface. Some type of mechanism is typically preferred to communicate real-time test data to well surface equipment. One possible communications mechanism is to run an electrical cable down the wellbore to the sensors. An alternative to real-time data gathering is to utilize downhole recorders that record the downhole sensor data and are subsequently retrieved to the surface after the test.
In addition, when testing is conducted in a cased wellbore, the casing must be perforated in order to flow the hydrocarbons into the wellbore. Perforating methods used to perforate the appropriate zones include wireline and tubing conveyed perforating. If tubing conveyed, the perforating guns are run downhole attached to the testing instruments. If wireline conveyed, the perforating guns are run first, and the testing instruments are deployed downhole once the guns are removed from the wellbore. The perforating jobs tend to be more intricate if more than one zone needs to be perforated within the wellbore.
A need thus exists for an improved method and apparatus for testing wells.
SUMMARY
One embodiment of my invention comprises a tool string for testing a wellbore formation that includes a production inlet, an injection outlet, and a sampler apparatus. Fluid is taken from a production zone, into the tool string through the production inlet, out of the tool string through the injection outlet, and into the injection zone. Within the interior of the tool string, the sampler apparatus takes samples of the fluid flowing therethrough. In another embodiment, a large volume of sample fluid is trapped within the interior of the tool string, such as between two valves, and is removed from the wellbore along with the tool string subsequent to the test. In another embodiment, the tool string includes at least one perforating gun to perforate one of the production and injection zones. The tool string may also include two perforating guns to perforate both the production and injection zones. One of the two perforating guns may be an oriented perforating gun so that upon activation the shape charges do not disturb any of the cables, data lines, or transmission lines associated with the tool string.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3111169 (1963-11-01), Hyde
patent: 3195633 (1965-07-01), Jacob
patent: 3294170 (1966-12-01), Warren et al.
patent: 3305014 (1967-02-01), Brieger
patent: 3611799 (1971-10-01), Davis
patent: 4009756 (1977-03-01), Zehren
patent: 4296810 (1981-10-01), Price
patent: 4434854 (1984-03-01), Vann et al.
patent: 4509604 (1985-04-01), Upchurch
patent: 4535843 (1985-08-01), Jageler
patent: 4560000 (1985-12-01), Upchurch
patent: 4583595 (1986-04-01), Czernichow et al.
patent: 4597439 (1986-07-01), Meek
patent: 4633945 (1987-01-01), Upchurch
patent: 4742459 (1988-05-01), Lasseter
patent: 4745802 (1988-05-01), Purfurst
patent: 4766957 (1988-08-01), McIntyre
patent: 4770243 (1988-09-01), Fouillout et al.
patent: 4803873 (1989-02-01), Ehlig-Economides
patent: 4856585 (1989-08-01), White et al.
patent: 4860581 (1989-08-01), Zimmerman et al.
patent: 5006046 (1991-04-01), Buckman et al.
patent: 5065619 (1991-11-01), Myska
patent: 5170844 (1992-12-01), George et al.
patent: 5337821 (1994-08-01), Peterson
patent: 5348420 (1994-09-01), Bernhardt
patent: 5353870 (1994-10-01), Harris
patent: 5361839 (1994-11-01), Griffith et al.
patent: 5425416 (1995-06-01), Hammeke et al.
patent: 5540280 (1996-07-01), Schultz et al.
patent: 5555945 (1996-09-01), Schultz et al.
patent: 5655605 (1997-08-01), Matthews
patent: 5762149 (1998-06-01), Donovan et al.
patent: 5799733 (1998-09-01), Ringgenberg et al.
patent: 5803186 (1998-09-01), Berger et al.
patent: 5826662 (1998-10-01), Beck et al.
patent: 5887652 (1999-03-01), Beck et al.
patent: 0 022 357 (1981-01-01), None
patent: 0 176 410 (1986-04-01), None
patent: 0 481 866 (1992-04-01), None
patent: 1 041 244 (2000-10-01), None
patent: WO 98/13579 (1998-04-01), None
patent: WO 98/36155 (1998-08-01), None
patent: WO 98/37307 (1998-08-01), None
patent: WO 98/48146 (1998-10-01), None
patent: WO 99/19602 (1999-04-01), None
patent: WO 99/24689 (1999-05-01), None
patent: WO 01/49973 (2001-07-01), None
Aly, Ahmed; Characterizing Multi-Layer Reservoirs Using a Fast Computational Simulator and a New Environmentally Sensitive Pre-Production Well Test; Dissertation, Texas A&M University; Aug. 1995; pp. 1-321.
Aly, Ahmed; Characterizing Multi-Layered Reservoirs Using a New, Simple, Inexpensive and Environmentally Senstive Pre-Production Well Test; SPE 70thAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, Oct. 22-25, 1995.
Aly, Ahmed, and Lee, W. John; Characterizing Multi-Layered Reservoirs Using a New, Simple, Inexpensive and Environmentally Sensitive Pre-Production Well Test; SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado; Oct. 5-9, 1996.
Shore-Tec AS; Downhole Production Testing; Downhole Production Testing Development Project; Jun. 17, 1997.
Woie, Rune; Downhole Pump for Well TestingDownhole Pump for Well Testing; WTN: New Formation Evaluation Tools Workshop; Apr. 27-29, 1998.
Antropov, A.D. and Galiev, N.S. and Elizarov, A.V. and Maksimov, V.P.; Results of Testing the Development Unit for Water Injection Between Formations on the Trekhozernoe Oilfield; Gipro Tyumen Nefte Gaz, Oil Producing Department “Shaimneft”.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for continuously testing a well does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for continuously testing a well, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for continuously testing a well will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2962018

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.