Television – Two-way video and voice communication – Conferencing
Reexamination Certificate
2001-07-16
2003-03-18
Ramakrishnaiah, Melur (Department: 2643)
Television
Two-way video and voice communication
Conferencing
C348S014090, C348S014110
Reexamination Certificate
active
06535240
ABSTRACT:
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
N/A.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
N/A.
REFERENCE TO A “MICROFICHE APPENDIX” (SEE 37 CFR 1.96)
N/A.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to video conferencing.
More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for video conferencing which significantly simplifies and reduces the expense of video conferencing equipment which continuously receives a video signal from each of two or more participants, combines the video signals into a single collective signal, and retransmits to each of the participants the collective signal so that each participant can view simultaneously himself or herself on a video screen along with the other participants.
In a further respect, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for video conferencing which receives a video frame from a participant and alters the headers and coded domain data, if necessary, in the frame without altering, in whole or in part, the pixel domain data which defines the picture transmitted with the frame.
In another respect, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for video conferencing which transmits to participants only the new information in one video channel at a time.
Video conferencing permits two or more participants to communicate both verbally and visually. The use of equipment which permits video conferencing has experienced only moderate growth in recent years because of cost, bandwidth limits, compatibility problems, and the limited advantages inherent in face-to-face meetings as compared to the traditional audio conference accomplished via telephone.
2. Description of the Related Art Including Information Disclosed Under 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98
Many commercially available video conferencing systems, including those video units which use the H.320, H.323 and H.324 envelope-protocols for call set up, call control plus audio and video coding-decoding or codec formats (H.320 is the protocols for ISDN network, H.323 for the LAN network and H.324 for the standard phone or POTS connections), only provide point-to-point video conferencing. Multi-point video conferencing requires the use of an MCU (multi-point control or conference unit). A MCU can operate either in a switched presence mode or continuous presence mode. In switched presence mode, only one video stream is selected and transmitted to all the participants based either on the audio signal or “chairman” switch control. In continuous presence mode, the MCU receives video signals from each participant in a video conference and combines the signals to produce a single hybrid signal, and sends the hybrid signal back to each participant. The hybrid signal enables each participant to view on one screen the pictures of the other participants along with his or her own picture on a real time basis using a split-screen. The sophisticated structure and large computation power of an MCU presently ordinarily require that it resides on a central server. Some providers of MCU systems claim that their MCU software can be operated on a desktop personal computer (PC). However, such MCU systems apparently support only the switched presence multi-point operation or they produce a video stream in proprietary formats which require each participant to install special video conferencing software or apparatus.
Some of the factors that have made conventional MCU systems complicated follow:
1. The H.263 codec format permits the continuous presence mode. In the continuous presence mode, a MCU receives four video streams from the participants, makes some header changes, and sends them back without combining them. The computer or other apparatus of each participant needs to decode and display all four video streams to see the pictures of all the participants. The H.261 codec format does not, however, permit the continuous presence mode. The H.261 is the required codec format for the H.323 video unit. H.263 is an optional codec format. In addition, some existing systems that run H.263 do not support the continuous presence mode which is optional in H.263.
2. Most existing video conferencing systems provide only point-to-point video conferencing.
3. An MCU system can provide continuous presence multi-point video conferencing only if it can combine several incoming video channels into a single outgoing video stream that can be decoded by the equipment which receives the outgoing video stream.
4. When an MCU system combines several incoming video channels, difficulties arise:
a. Incoming streams may use different codec formats, e.g., H.261 or H.263.
b. Even if incoming streams have the same codec format, they may have different picture types, e.g., I picture or P picture.
c. Even if incoming streams have the same codec format and the same picture type, they each may have or utilize different quantizers. This makes the adjustment of the DCT coefficients necessary and at the same time introduces errors.
d. Video frames in each of the video channels ordinarily arrive at different times. When the MCU awaits the arrival of a frame or frames from each video channel, a time delay results.
e. If the MCU waits for the arrival of a frame or frames from each video channel, operation of the MCU is, in substance, controlled by the channel with the slowest frame rate.
f. An existing technique for solving the non-synchronized frame rate problem mentioned above is to substitute the slower channels with the previous images, so that the faster channels are updated while the slower ones remain the same. But this practice takes a significant amount of memory for buffering the images and it may mean each image has to be fully decoded and encoded.
Accordingly, it would be highly desirable to provide an improved video conferencing system which could, in essence, provide continuous presence multi-point video conferencing while avoiding some or all of the various problems in prior art MCU systems.
Therefore, it is a principal object of the instant invention to provide an improved video conferencing system.
A further object of the invention is to provide an improved method and apparatus for providing a continuous presence multi-point video conferencing system.
Another object of the invention is to provide an improved continuous presence multi-point video conferencing system which significantly simplifies and reduces the expense of existing multi-point video conferencing systems
REFERENCES:
patent: 5003532 (1991-03-01), Ashida et al.
patent: 5440683 (1995-08-01), Nally et al.
patent: 5453780 (1995-09-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5548324 (1996-08-01), Downs et al.
patent: 5671377 (1997-09-01), Bleidt et al.
patent: 5691768 (1997-11-01), Civanlar et al.
patent: 5903563 (1999-05-01), Rashid et al.
patent: 6128649 (2000-10-01), Smith et al.
patent: 6141062 (2000-10-01), Hall et al.
patent: 6147695 (2000-11-01), Bowen et al.
patent: 6195116 (2001-02-01), Lee
patent: 6198500 (2001-03-01), Watanabe et al.
patent: 0 523 299 (1993-01-01), None
patent: 1 1041 756 (2000-10-01), None
patent: WO 99/35660 (1999-07-01), None
patent: WO 00/13147 (2000-03-01), None
patent: WO 00/74373 (2000-12-01), None
patent: WO 01/22735 (2001-03-01), None
Kuo Chen-Yuan
Yang Chih-Lung
Nissle P.C. Tod R.
Ramakrishnaiah Melur
LandOfFree
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTINUOUSLY RECEIVING FRAMES FROM... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTINUOUSLY RECEIVING FRAMES FROM..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTINUOUSLY RECEIVING FRAMES FROM... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3074159