Metal working – Method of mechanical manufacture – With testing or indicating
Reexamination Certificate
2002-05-16
2004-02-17
Vidovich, Gregory (Department: 3726)
Metal working
Method of mechanical manufacture
With testing or indicating
C029S407010, C029S407100, C029S464000, C029S466000, C029S468000, C029S705000, C029S709000, C029S712000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06691392
ABSTRACT:
FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
Not applicable.
REFERENCE TO A MICROFICHE APPENDIX
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to a method and apparatus for the assembly of body components to an automotive body that has undergone a progressive series of positioning and welding steps so as to produce a structurally rigid body frame, termed a body-in-white. More specifically, this invention relates to reestablishing a new grid system (XYZ coordinate system) for a body-in-white, after assembly, so as to direct the associated tooling to establish net attachment positions for all body components thereby eliminating the need for any slip plane adjustment techniques.
2. Description of the Related Art
For many decades, automobile and truck body frames, that typically include at least an underbody, a pair of side frames, and front and rear headers, conventionally undergo a progressive series of positioning and welding steps before a structurally rigid body frame, termed a body-in-white, is produced. Though bodies are still manually assembled and welded, emphasis on automated assembly and welding operations has for many years generated numerous automated and semi-automated framing systems.
In an attempt to create and maintain dimensional integrity in the building of automotive bodies, typically, framing systems that involve a degree of automation include the operations of locating the components relative to each other on the underbody. Primary locating points established on the underbody are used throughout the body shop operation as well as in the body inspection room and are generally established by locating on each of the rails, a four way locating pin forward and a two way locating pin rearward. Usually, the underbody is then clamped in place at specific points of location. The primary locating points are also used to locate for purposes of inspecting in the body build shop. The components are located relative to each other and relative to the underbody and are loosely assembled to each other. Typically, the various components include a floor panel, right and left body side panels, a dash panel and either a roof panel or transversely extending header members upon which a roof panel is subsequently mounted. After these individual panels are stamped, in some applications, preliminary assembly operations are performed on individual panels as, for example, adding door hinge and latch hardware to the body side panels at approximate locations on a door opening, adding seat mounting brackets and reinforcements to the floor panel, etc.
The set of panels that constitute a subassembly of the finished vehicle body are then brought together and loosely assembled to each other. This initial loose assembly frequently is accomplished by a so called “toy tab” arrangement in which one panel is created with a tab projecting from one edge that is received in a slot in an adjacent panel. This technique interlocks the panels and frame members to each other to the point where they will not separate from each other, but does not achieve a rigid assembly, that is, for example, the side panels may tilt slightly relative to the floor panel. Alternatively, some initial pre-tack welding may be performed in order to loosely maintain the components together. The loosely assembled subassembly is then transported to a framing/welding station whereat, in order to accurately establish the desired final geometry of all of the components of the body-in-white, the toy tab components are clamped to locating frames, often termed gate fixtures. Thereafter, welding operations, are performed within the framing and respot station to more permanently and securely weld the components together to accurately form a rigid structure referred to as the body-in-white. Current body framing stations employ both fixed and robotic welders that can be programmed to perform several welds at different locations on the body in one framing station. The welders typically are located at opposite sides of the conveying line at the welding station, and when the body's subassembly is located in the welding station, the fixed weldings and robotic welders perform welds on designated areas on the body. In those cases where clamping frames are positioned on opposite sides of the body, clearance problems may restrict motion of the welding heads that must pass through the clamping frame before they have access to the body. This will result in the performance of only a portion of the required welding at one station and the advancement of the partially welded subassembly to an additional respot welding stations where different clamping frames allow the welding head to access those portions of the body assembly that could not be reached by the welding heads in the first station. After the body is transported to the final welding, or respot, station the remaining welds are made to establish a structurally rigid body frame.
Although many variations of the above process are known, it is the general object of each framing system to accurately net locate the body components relative to each other and maintain the established net location or position throughout the later welding operations, until the structural rigidity of the body-in-white is sufficient to preserve the desired geometric configuration throughout the assembly process.
It is readily recognized that these conventional assembly techniques include many assembly steps that require parts to be physically stacked on top of one another and then secured to each other by welding, and wherein each component is created with a certain accuracy and tolerance. That is, a particular component, and any point on that component, is typically required to be manufactured to a specific dimensional configuration, within a specified tolerance range. If an individual panel to be affixed references a point on another panel, the reference point also has a dimensional tolerance variation. The tolerance of the assembly formed by these components will also be “stacked” together. That is, the dimensional tolerance of the first panel will be added, to some degree, to that of the second panel to be attached thereto. As more components are fixed to the assembly that references additional attachment points, the tolerances of the individual points are “stacked” to create a greater tolerance variation for the “stacked” components.
The small tolerance variations in the primary locating points for locating the underbody combined with the gate fixtures that typically allow some play in the positioning of the panels prior to clamping inherently results in some built-up inaccuracies for the body-in-white. Also, the repositioning of the framing system in a respot station, again, results in an additional positional tolerance inherently creating additional inaccuracies for the location of the various panels with respect to each other. Accordingly, it is quite evident that as a number of panels with positional dimensional tolerances are stacked the total manufacturing tolerance of the framed body-in-white will increase. Experience has shown that the “stacking” built in tolerances in the framing process increases the total manufacturing tolerance and can become quite substantial.
Accordingly, over a period of years, many have attempted to improve the manufacturing method so as to reduce the overall or total tolerance in vehicle assemblies utilizing a variety of techniques in an attempt to reduce the inherent inaccuracies of the vehicle body assembly as well as the body-in-white.
To attempt to reduce the inherent built in inaccuracies in the process of building automobile bodies with the objective of reducing overall tolerance variations, many alternative framing schemes have been proposed over the years. For example, DeRees, U.S. Pat. No. 5,090,105, teaches a modular vehicle construction assembly method in which various structural modules are fabricated and assembled with operating vehicle components prior to mounting with other fabricated and assembled modul
Kline John A.
Savoy Mark A.
Omgba Essama
Utica Enterprises Inc.
VanOphem & VanOphem P.C.
Vidovich Gregory
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for assembling exterior automotive... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for assembling exterior automotive..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for assembling exterior automotive... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3336989