Method and apparatus for applying energy to biological...

Surgery – Instruments – Electrical application

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C128S898000, C607S105000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10872646

ABSTRACT:
An electrode catheter is introduced into a hollow anatomical structure, such as a vein, and is positioned at a treatment site within the structure. Tumescent fluid is injected into the tissue surrounding the treatment site to produce tumescence of the surrounding tissue which then compresses the vein. The solution may include an anesthetic, and may further include a vasoconstrictive drug that shrinks blood vessels. The tumescent swelling in the surrounding tissue causes the hollow anatomical structure to become compressed, thereby exsanguinating the treatment site. Energy is applied by an electrode catheter in apposition with the vein wall to create a heating effect. The heating effect causes the hollow anatomical structure to become molded and durably assume the compressed dimensions caused by the tumescent technique. The electrode catheter can be moved within the structure so as to apply energy to a large section of the hollow anatomic structure. In a further aspect, the location of the electrodes is determined by impedance monitoring. Also, temperature sensors at the treatment site are averaged to determine the site temperature.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3301258 (1967-01-01), Werner et al.
patent: 4564011 (1986-01-01), Goldman
patent: 4643186 (1987-02-01), Rosen et al.
patent: 4660571 (1987-04-01), Hess et al.
patent: 4776349 (1988-10-01), Nashef et al.
patent: 5122137 (1992-06-01), Lennox
patent: 5127902 (1992-07-01), Fischell
patent: 5188602 (1993-02-01), Nichols
patent: 5556396 (1996-09-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 5695495 (1997-12-01), Ellman et al.
patent: 5709224 (1998-01-01), Behl et al.
patent: 5827268 (1998-10-01), Laufer
patent: 5863290 (1999-01-01), Gough et al.
patent: 6033397 (2000-03-01), Laufer et al.
patent: 6033398 (2000-03-01), Farley et al.
patent: 6036687 (2000-03-01), Laufer et al.
patent: 6139527 (2000-10-01), Laufer et al.
patent: 6152899 (2000-11-01), Farley et al.
patent: 6210402 (2001-04-01), Olsen et al.
patent: 6228082 (2001-05-01), Baker et al.
patent: 6258084 (2001-07-01), Goldman et al.
patent: 6398777 (2002-06-01), Navarro et al.
patent: 6401719 (2002-06-01), Farley et al.
patent: 6689126 (2004-02-01), Farley et al.
patent: 6752803 (2004-06-01), Goldman et al.
patent: 0 189 329 (1986-07-01), None
patent: 0 727 184 (1996-08-01), None
patent: 207289 (1967-12-01), None
patent: WO 93/21846 (1993-11-01), None
patent: WO 94/07446 (1994-04-01), None
patent: WO 95/31142 (1995-11-01), None
patent: WO 97/32532 (1997-09-01), None
patent: WO 98/19613 (1998-05-01), None
Min et al, U.S. Appl. No. 60/118,050, filed Feb. 1, 1999.
Min et al, U.S. Appl No. 60/119,235, filed Feb. 9, 1999.
Excerpt from file history of US 6,769,433: preliminary amendment of Sep. 2001, office action of Sep. 2002, amendment of Mar. 2003, office action of Jul. 2003, amendments of Dec. 2003 and Jan. 2004, notice of allowability of Apr. 2004.
Excerpt from file history of US 6,237,606: original claims, preliminary amendement of Mar. 1999, office action of Feb. 2000, amendment of Apr. 2000, office action of Jul. 2000, summary of interview of Sep. 2000, amendment of Oct. 2000, notice of allowability of Jan. 2001.
Excerpt from file history of U.S. Appl. No. 10/900,563: original claims, office action of Jan. 2005, amendment of Apr. 2005, office action of Jun. 2005, office action of Dec. 2005, amendment of May 2006, office action of Aug. 2006, summary of interview of Jan. 2007, office action response of Jan. 2007, office action of Apr. 2007, response filed Jul. 2007, supplemental response filed Aug. 2007.
Excerpt from file history of US 6,752,803: preliminary amendment of Jul. 2001, office action of Sep. 2002, amendment of Mar. 2003, office action of Jun. 2003, summary of interview of Oct. 2003, amendment of Oct. 2003, office action of Nov. 2003, response of Jan. 2004, notice of allowability of Feb. 2004.
Excerpt from file history of US 6,258,084: original claims, office action of Apr. 2000, amendment of Aug. 2000, summary of interview of Dec. 2000, notice of allowability of Dec. 2000.
Excerpt from file history of U.S. Appl. No. 10/738,488: preliminary amendment of Mar. 2004, office action of Mar. 2006, response of Apr. 2006, office action of Jun. 2006, summary of interview of Oct. 2006, amendment of Oct. 2006, office action of Jun. 2007, summary of interview of Aug. 2007, amendment filed Sep. 2007.
Excerpt from file history of US 6,682,526: original claims, preliminary amendments of Nov. 2000, Jan. 2001, May 2001, office action of Feb. 2002, response of Mar. 2002, office action of Jul. 2002, amendment of Jan. 2003, office action of Mar. 2003, amendment of Aug. 2003, notice of allowability of Sep. 2003.
Excerpt from file history of U.S. Appl. No. 10/164,928: original claims, office action of Oct. 2003, amendment of Apr. 2004, office action of Jul. 2004, terminal disclaimer of Aug. 2004, restriction requirement of Jul. 2007, amendment and response filed Oct. 2007.
Excerpt from file history of US 6,401,719: original claims, office action of Oct. 2000, amendment of Dec. 2000, office action of Mar. 2001, amendment of Jul. 2001, office action of Aug. 2001, response of Nov. 2001, notice of allowability of Mar. 2002.
Ogawa et al., Electrothrombosis as a Treatment of Cirsoid Angioma in the Face and Scalp and Varicosis of the Leg, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 310-318, Sep. 1982.
Partsch, Compression Therapy of the Legs, J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 17:799-805, 1991.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Defendants' Joint Motion and Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC §§ 102-103 (unredacted version), dated Aug. 10, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Declaration of Charles T. Steenburg (with Exhibits I, O-Q, BB and DD thereto) in support of Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC §§ 102-103, dated Aug. 10, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Defendants' Joint Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC §§ 102-103 (unredacted version), dated Aug. 31, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Declaration of Charles T. Steenburg (with Exhibits KK, MM and OO thereto) in support of Defendants' Joint Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC §§ 102-103, dated Aug. 31, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Defendants' Joint Motion and Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC § 112 (unredacted version), dated Aug. 10, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Declaration of Dr. R. Rox Anderson in support of Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC § 112, dated Aug. 10, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Declaration of Richard J. Twilley (with Exhibits C, I, L-N and R-U thereto) in support of Defendents' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC § 112, dated Aug. 10, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Defendants' Joint Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC § 112 (unredacted version), dated Aug. 31, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Declaration of Eric E. Grondahl (with Exhibits A-D thereto) in support of Defendants' Joint Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 USC § 112, dated Aug. 31, 2007.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC): Defendant Diomed's Answer to First Amended Complaint, dated Oct. 31, 2005.
VNUS Medical Technologies v. Diomed Holdings et al(N.D. Cal., Case No. C05-02972 MMC

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for applying energy to biological... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for applying energy to biological..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for applying energy to biological... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3957601

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.