Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Plural display systems – Tiling or modular adjacent displays
Reexamination Certificate
2000-07-13
2004-04-27
Chow, Dennis-Doon (Department: 2675)
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Plural display systems
Tiling or modular adjacent displays
C345S903000, C348S744000, C348S745000, C348S751000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06727864
ABSTRACT:
This invention relates generally to the field of optical displays, and more particularly pertains to tiled displays used to produce large, and/or high resolution images.
BACKGROUND
Multiple projection displays have been proposed and used for many years. In the 1950's, the “CINERAMA” system was developed for the film industry. The CINERAMA system used three films to project three images using three separate projectors, which were then combined to form a single panoramic image. Disneyland continues to use a similar multiple projector system, wherein a circle of projectors, shine onto a screen that circles the wall of a round room.
In the video field, multiple projector systems have been proposed and used for a number of specialty applications. U.S. Pat. No. 4,103,435 to Herndon and U.S. Pat. No. 3,833,764 to Taylor suggest using multiple projector systems for flight simulators. In many of these systems, multiple video screens are placed next to each other to form a large image display. A difficulty with many of the video based multiple projector display systems is that the multiple images often do not appear as one single continuous image on the display screen.
When multiple images are projected side-by-side on a single screen, there is normally a seam or overlapping region between the images (for example in an M×N projector array, where M and N are generally expressed as positive integer values, though, in using of overlap and portions of displays, fractional values may be assigned. Also M×N projector arrays can be arranged to have constant and identical overlap or can be arranged to have varying degrees of overlap, depending on one's optimization criteria, which can include reliability, fault tolerance, cost and performance). The final display image will either appear as multiple images placed side-by-side with a gap between images or, if the images are made to overlap on a single screen, with a bright line or band there between. In the region of overlap the light from each projector will add to the output light of the other(s). This applies to the black output level as well. Ideally, when displaying a black image, this region of overlap should be generally uniformly black across the entire displayed image. Instead one generally observes the black image to brighten in the regions of overlap. When the images of two projectors overlap, the amount of light in the overlapped regions of the images is approximately double the amount of light observed on the screen in regions where only a single projector image resides (in regions where four projected images overlap, the amount of light is approximately four times that of the single projector image, and so on). Thus, the observer of the screen will generally see the output image containing objectionable artifacts. The same effects happen for white images, and for all images in between black and white. Generally, the black and the white images may be conceptualized as the upper and lower reference levels for constructing any image whose content spans these two extremes.
The prior art (for example, in the Panoram tiled display) resolved overlap issues by requiring the display device to have a black reference level having very low stray light. This needed the use of CRT's, because CRT's have huge native contrast ratios and deep black, several times darker than other common display media such as LCD projectors, and DMD projectors. While the deep-dark display or CRT-only architecture might work well for many applications, it fails to meet requirements found in the cinematic, the medical and other industries demanding high image quality and performance. In these high performance applications, the contrast ratio requirements often exceed 1000:1. The cinema industry generally requires 1500:1, and the medical industry generally requires displays for digital radiography having contrast ratios in the range of about 2000:1 to 4000:1. With the contrast ratio of CRT's at that or a lesser range, any overlapping strategy as used in the CRT-only architecture fails. It divides the contrast ratio by the number of CRT's used. Thus, for a cinematic application requiring a contrast ratio of 1500:1, any overlap of the CRT's will shrink the contrast ratio to 750:1 in the region of overlap. Any regions having four CRT's overlapping will show a quadrupling in brightness and thus a reduction in contrast ratio to a mere 375:1. This is observable and generally objectionable in the industry.
Attempts have been made to hide such artifacts, one such example being raising the regions of non-overlap to the same brightness levels as the regions of overlap. Such practices are usually implemented by adjusting the input video level to obliterate the visibility of the regions of overlap. However, this method reduces the contrast ratio over the entire display, even in areas where only a single projector projects its image content. And in cases where multiple CRT's or other imaging devices overlap their imagery, the contrast ratio over the entire display will be compromised accordingly.
What is desired is a fall-off in intensity of black and white levels such that the superposed images produce a uniform luminance from center to edges, including the overlapped regions of the projected image. In practice, such an ideal luminance profile is difficult to achieve, as the displays generally exhibit a fall-off in intensity from the center of displayed image to its edges. To attain a uniform, center to edge luminance profile requires clipping the display's native intensity at display center and elsewhere to the same value as at the edges. Unfortunately, this will result in the loss of the displays native brightness and will significantly reduce the power to image brightness conversion efficiency of the system. Another method based on insensitivity of human vision to low spatial frequency changes is to allow a fall-off of the luminance profile near the edges of the tiled image. In theory, such profiles can be achieved electronically by adjusting the video going into each display. The corrective functions can be multiplied by the image content and will result in a uniform output over much of the gray scales to be rendered. However, the closer the input image approaches the black state, the more the actual deviates from the ideal using this method. This is because the input video commanding a black state on the display does not achieve a true black state in practice. This, as was explained above, is because display technologies generally pass or emit light even when displaying black.
Therefore there is a need for a seamless tiled projection system that does not produce any artifacts in the overlapping region, and is easier to incorporate into a commercial projector system, and yet provides a seamless tiled display image over a wider viewing angle than that of the prior art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
These and other embodiments, aspects, advantages, and features of the present invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art by reference to the following description of the invention and referenced drawings or by practice of the invention. The aspects, advantages, and features of the invention are realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities, procedures, and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims and their equivalents.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a method of producing a seamless tiled display image from multiple overlapping discrete images produced by multiple displays includes measuring a luminance profile of each of the displays used in producing a seamless display image. The method then computes a desired luminance profile for each of the displays producing the seamless tiled display image. It determines a spatial gradient profile of each of the displays based on the measured luminance profile and the computed desired luminance profile of each of the displays. Then the method applies the
Chen Chung-Jen
Johnson Michael
Chow Dennis-Doon
Honeywell International , Inc.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for an optical function generator for... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for an optical function generator for..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for an optical function generator for... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3245362