Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Finance
Reexamination Certificate
1998-11-03
2003-05-20
Hayes, John W. (Department: 2161)
Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co
Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
Finance
C705S039000, C705S042000, C705S035000, C705S026640
Reexamination Certificate
active
06567791
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to methods and apparatuses for electronic commerce. More specifically, the invention relates to methods and apparatuses for evaluating the reason for rejecting a credit card applicant and supplying an appropriate reason for such rejection.
2. Relationship to the Art
With the advent of electronic commerce on the Internet, applicants have begun to expect decisions that have historically required a period of days or weeks to be made instantly when processed on line. Numerous transactions such as purchases of consumer goods, airline tickets, and movie tickets have been adapted for execution on line in a matter of seconds. What has not been perfected is the ability to make a credit decision and grant credit to a party on line in real time. (For the purpose of this specification, “instant” or “real time” credit means within a short period of time within less than about five minutes.) As a result, virtually all Internet commerce to date requires some previously secured method of payment such as a credit card obtained by conventional means or other previously arranged payment source such as a bank account or electronic money.
Many credit card issuers provide applications on line that may be filled out by applicants. However, the underwriting decision for such applications is not made and communicated on line. If such a decision could be made on line and communicated to the applicant, it would be important for rejected applicants to communicate the rejection in a manner that is consistent with the legal requirements for rejecting credit applicants.
When a credit card issuer rejects an applicant, there are specific legal requirements for how that rejection must be made. These requirements are set forth in detail at 37 CFR 202 et. seq. In addition to meeting the various legal requirements, it would be desirable to provide rejected applicants with a reason for rejection that makes sense to the rejected applicant for the purpose of increasing goodwill and decreasing incidence of complaints. Raw credit bureau data may provide certain factors that were relevant to the determination of a FICO score for an applicant. However, such factors often may not provide a reasonable basis for rejection, since certain positive factors such as home ownership may be included for rejected applicants.
In addition, it would be desirable if a method could be developed for verifying that a rejected applicant has downloaded and viewed a rejection message. If such a method could be developed with sufficient reliability to meet the legal requirements of rejecting an applicant, then it could potentially be possible to avoid the cost of having to send a rejection notice letter to rejected applicants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of determining an appropriate reason for rejecting a credit applicant based on data obtained from one or more credit reports. Important factors influencing the applicant's FICO score are analyzed and inappropriate rejection factors are discarded. In addition, other attributes derived from the applicant's credit report are analyzed and it is determined whether any of those attributes are appropriate rejection factors.
It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device, a method, or a computer readable medium. Several inventive embodiments are described below.
In one embodiment, a method of presenting a reason for the rejection of a credit application from an applicant is disclosed. The method includes obtaining a factor from a credit bureau identified as influencing the FICO score assigned to the application by the credit bureau. The factor identified by the credit bureau is mapped to an internal rejection code. A rejection reason that corresponds to the internal rejection code is provided to the applicant.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be presented in more detail in the following specification of the invention and the accompanying figures, which illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5187735 (1993-02-01), Herrero Garcia et al.
patent: 5239462 (1993-08-01), Jones et al.
patent: 5262941 (1993-11-01), Saladin et al.
patent: 5387783 (1995-02-01), Mihm et al.
patent: 5450537 (1995-09-01), Hirai et al.
patent: 5611052 (1997-03-01), Dykstra et al.
patent: 5696907 (1997-12-01), Tom
patent: 5704029 (1997-12-01), Wright, Jr.
patent: 5727163 (1998-03-01), Bezos
patent: 5745654 (1998-04-01), Titan
patent: 5761640 (1998-06-01), Kalyanswamy et al.
patent: 5774882 (1998-06-01), Keen et al.
patent: 5774883 (1998-06-01), Andersen et al.
patent: 5797133 (1998-08-01), Jones et al.
patent: 5819029 (1998-10-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 5819236 (1998-10-01), Josephson
patent: 5819291 (1998-10-01), Haimowitz et al.
patent: 5832465 (1998-11-01), Tom
patent: 5870721 (1999-02-01), Norris
patent: 5878403 (1999-03-01), DeFrancesco et al.
patent: 5911135 (1999-06-01), Atkins
patent: 5930776 (1999-07-01), Dykstra et al.
patent: 5940811 (1999-08-01), Norris
patent: 5940812 (1999-08-01), Tengel et al.
patent: 5950179 (1999-09-01), Buchanan et al.
patent: 5960411 (1999-09-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 5966699 (1999-10-01), Zandi
patent: 5970478 (1999-10-01), Walker et al.
patent: 5987434 (1999-11-01), Libman
patent: 5995947 (1999-11-01), Fraser et al.
patent: 6000832 (1999-12-01), Franklin et al.
patent: 6014645 (2000-01-01), Cunningham
patent: 6029149 (2000-02-01), Dykstra et al.
patent: 6029890 (2000-02-01), Austin
patent: 6064987 (2000-05-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6088686 (2000-07-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6105007 (2000-08-01), Norris
patent: 6112190 (2000-08-01), Fletcher et al.
patent: 6119103 (2000-09-01), Basch et al.
patent: 6182124 (2001-01-01), Lau et al.
patent: 6192380 (2001-02-01), Light et al.
patent: 6199079 (2001-03-01), Gupta et al.
patent: 6202053 (2001-03-01), Christiansen et al.
patent: 6208979 (2001-03-01), Sinclair
patent: 6272506 (2001-08-01), Bell
patent: 6289319 (2001-09-01), Lockwood
patent: 6311169 (2001-10-01), Duhon
patent: 6349290 (2002-02-01), Horowitz et al.
patent: 2001/0011246 (2001-08-01), Tammaro
patent: 2001/0011282 (2001-08-01), Katsumata et al.
patent: 2001/0014877 (2001-08-01), Defrancesco et al.
patent: 0840244 (1998-06-01), None
patent: WO 97/22073 (1997-06-01), None
Canter, Ronald S., “Lender Beware—Federal Regulation of Consumer Credit”, Credit World, vol. 81, No. 5, pp. 16-20, May 1993.*
Staff, “On-Line System Approves Loans While Customer Waits”, Communication News, vol. 31, No. 9, Sep. 1994.*
“Low-Rent Loan Officer In a Kiosk”, Bank Technology News, vol. 8, No. 2, p. 5, Feb. 1995.*
Duclaux, Denise, “A Check for $5,000 in Ten Minutes”, ABA Banking Journal, vol. 87, No. 8, p. 45, Aug. 1995.*
“World Wide Web Enhances Customer's Choice”, Cards International, No. 143, p. 9, Nov. 1995.*
“Wells Fargo Launches First Real-Time, Online Home Equity Credit Decision-Making Service”, Business Wire, Jun. 1998, Dialog File 621:New Product Announcement.*
Handley, John, “Credit Review Lets the Numbers Do the Talking in Home Mortgage Game”, Chicago Tribune, Jul. 1998.*
Sherman, Lee, “Wells Fargo Writes a New Online Script”, Interactive Week, vol. 5, No. 31, p. 29, Aug. 1998.*
FIData, Inc., Press Release, Aug. 26, 1998, http://fidata-inc.com.*
Calvey, Mark, “Internet Gives Bankers a Snappy Comeback”, San Francisco Business Times, vol. 13, No. 5, p. 3, Sep. 1998.*
McCormick, Linda, “Users of Credit Scoring Face Tough Rules on Notification”, American Banker, Dialog File 625:American Banker Publications, May 21, 1982.*
“What the Credit Bureau is Saying About You: If a Mistake Sneaks Into Your Record, You May Not Know About it Until You Get Turned Down for Credit”, Changing Times, vol. 37, p. 56, Jul. 1983.*
McShane, Peter K., “Got Financing?”, Business Journal Serving Southern Tier, CNY, Mohawk Valley, Finger Lakes, North, vol. 11, Issue 19, p. 9, Sep. 15, 1997.*
Cai Yinzi
Coltrell Timothy J.
Dowhan David W.
Lent Jeremy R.
Lent Mary
Hayes John W.
NextCard, Inc.
Van Pelt & Yi LLP
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for a verifiable on line rejection of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for a verifiable on line rejection of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for a verifiable on line rejection of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3022063