Wells – Processes – With indicating – testing – measuring or locating
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-02
2003-06-10
Neuder, William (Department: 3672)
Wells
Processes
With indicating, testing, measuring or locating
C166S066000, C166S264000, C166S306000, C166S250170
Reexamination Certificate
active
06575242
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method and an apparatus for use in production test of a formation expected to be permeable. After having pointed out the existence of hydrocarbons upon drilling for oil and gas, a so-called production test is carried out, in order to provide information about permeable layers outside the bore hole or well itself.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Prior to a production test, when reservoir fluid is allowed to flow out of the formation, the well is provided with some equipment, including means to control the flow rate and measuring equipment to measure pressure and flow rate.
A production test has two phases, each with a duration of e.g. 24 hours. In both phases, a constant fluid flow is established from the formation.
In the beginning, it is fluid in the immediate neighbourhood of the well that flows into the well but, gradually, fluid from areas spaced at constantly larger distances from the well is drained off. The pressure within the well decreases due to the fact that the fluid must flow a constantly longer distance through the formation and, thus, is subjected to a constantly increasing pressure loss. Upon the maintenance of a constant flow rate, it is achieved that the course of pressure within the well only depends on the character of the formation, which can be examined. Therefore, the course of pressure, i.e. interdependent values for pressure and time, is recorded during the production test. In the second phase of the production test, following immediately after the first phase, the fluid flow into the well is stopped.
Then, the pressure within the well will gradually increase to formation pressure as the formation around the well is refilled by means of the fluid flow into the well from remote areas. Also in this second phase, values for pressure and time are recorded.
Recorded pressure—time values in the two phases of the production test represent an important basis for subsequent analyses, appraisals and planning of further drilling activity and, possibly, development of an oil field. The question may well arise as to record other parameters, e.g. temperature, in addition to pressure and it is, of course, important to carry out chemical analyses of samples from the reservoir fluid.
Sealing means, e.g. in the form of annulus packers, are also adapted to take care of security requirements.
The present invention is directed to a method and an apparatus for maintaining a constant flow of reservoir fluid in the well while pressure and, possibly, other parameters are read off.
By a production test it is known to conduct fluid from the reservoir to the surface through a so-called tubing, which is installed in the well. Sealing means are disposed within the annulus between the production tubing and the well wall, preferably on a place where a well casing has been installed, so that reservoir fluid is conducted to the surface through the tubing and not through the annulus. At the upper end thereof, the tubing is assigned a valve adapted to control the fluid flow, and sensors and measuring equipment are disposed, at least for allowing the reading off and recording time, flow rate in the tubing and pressure within the well.
It is known to install a downhole pump in order to achieve and maintain sufficient flow rate to carry out a production test if the pressure within the reservoir or the properties of the formation or reservoir fluid are such that this is required.
Even if the described technique is well developed and has been known for many years, it still suffers from a plurality of disadvantages and deficiencies.
Reservoir fluid constitutes, when it reaches the surface, a safety risk due to danger of explosion, fire hazard and toxicity. Therefore, substantial security measures must be made in connection with a production test. Additionally, reservoir fluid constitutes an environmental problem because production tests naturally are carried out before one takes the costs of installing process equipment. Therefore, it has been customary to conduct reservoir fluid to a burner. Due to the fact that combustion causes unwanted escapes of environmental gases and uncontrolled amounts of hydrocarbons into the sea, there exist some places, such as on the Norwegian continental shelf, where, owing to restrictions on burning and limitation in periods during a year for testing, it has become interesting to collect produced reservoir fluid and convey it to a suitable process plant. Even if this is an environmentally satisfactory solution, it is, nevertheless, awkward, price-raising as well as exhibitting many restrictions both in time and with respect to weather conditions.
The preparations taking place before production testing comprise typically setting and cementing of casings for insulating various permeable layers, and to take care of safety requirements. Additionally, special production tubing is used down to the layer/bed to be tested. These preparations are time-consuming and expensive. Safety considerations make it some times necessary to strengthen an already set well casing, perhaps over the entire or a substantial part of the length of the well; particularly in high pressure wells it might be required to install extra casings in the upper parts of the well.
It can be difficult to secure a good cementing, and it may arise channels, cracks or lack of cement. In many cases, it is difficult to define or measure the quality of the cement or the presence of cement. Unsatisfactory cementing causes great possibility for the occurrence of so-called cross flows to or from other permeable formations outside the casing. Cross flows may, to a high degree, influence the measurements carried out. Time-consuming and very expensive cementing repairs might be required in order to eliminate such sources of errors.
Today's system can take care of drilling of wells in deep waters, but does not provide a safe and secure production testing. In deep water, it is difficult to take care of security in case the drilling vessel drifts out of position, or whenever the riser is subjected to large, uncontrollable and not measurable vibrations or leeway. Such a situation requires a rapid disconnection of the riser or production tubing subsequently to the closing of the production valve at the seabed. To-day's system is defective in respect of reacting on and point out dangerous situations.
Further, in ordinary production it is usual to use various forms of well stimulation. Such stimulation may consist in the addition of chemicals into the formation in order to increase the flow rate. A simple well stimulation consists in subjecting the formation to pressure pulses so that it cracks and, thus, becomes more permeable, so-called “fracturing” of the formation. A side-effect of fracturing can be a large increase in the amount of sand accompanying the reservoir fluid. In connection with production testing, it may in some relations be of interest to be able to effect a well stimulation in order to observe the effect thereof. Again, the case is such that an ordinary production equipment is adapted to avoid, withstand, resist and separate out sand, while corresponding measures are of less importance when carrying out a production test.
In some cases, it would be useful to be able to carry out a reversed production test, pumping produced fluid back into the formation again. However, this presupposes that produced fluid can be kept at approximate reservoir pressure and temperature. This will require extra equipment, and it will be necessary to use additional security measures. Further, it would require transfer of the production tubing. Probably, the production tubing would have to be pulled up and set once more, in order to give access to another formation. This is time-consuming as well as expensive. Therefore, it is not of actual interest to use such reversed production tests in connection with prior art technique. During a reversed production test, a pressure increase is observed in the well while a reversed constant fluid flow is maintained. When the revers
Dougherty Jennifer R.
Neuder William
Shore-Tec AS
Smith Gambrell & Russell
LandOfFree
Method and an apparatus for use in production tests, testing... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and an apparatus for use in production tests, testing..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and an apparatus for use in production tests, testing... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3110336