Metallic nanoparticles as orthopedic biomaterial

Details Metallic nanoparticles as orthopedic biomaterial Metallic nanoparticles as orthopedic biomaterial

2004-03-26

2010-11-02

King, Roy (Department: 1793)

Specialized metallurgical processes, compositions for use therei

Compositions

Consolidated metal powder compositions

C419S066000, C623S011110, C623S023530, C977S931000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07824462

ABSTRACT:
A composition for use as a prosthetic biomaterial and associated method. The biomaterial exhibits cytocompatibility, mechanical functionality and osteoblast adhesion between the implant and interfacing surface. The biomaterial is metallic, has a grain size less than about 500 nanometers and has a surface roughness of less than about 800 nm rms.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5292328 (1994-03-01), Hain et al.
patent: 5415704 (1995-05-01), Davidson
patent: 5733337 (1998-03-01), Carr, Jr. et al.
patent: 6183255 (2001-02-01), Oshida et al.
patent: 6319264 (2001-11-01), Tormala et al.
patent: 6368859 (2002-04-01), Atala
patent: 6572672 (2003-06-01), Yadav et al.
patent: 6669706 (2003-12-01), Schmitt et al.
patent: 2003/0040809 (2003-02-01), Goldmann et al.
patent: 2004/0171323 (2004-09-01), Shalaby
patent: 2004/0241211 (2004-12-01), Fischell et al.
patent: WO 01/55473 (2001-08-01), None
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2004/003958, International Filing Date Mar. 26, 2004. ISR completion date Nov. 24, 2004, Date of Mailing Jan. 5, 2005.
Wen et al., “Preparation of Bioactive Microporous Titanium Surface by a New Two-Step Chemical Treatment,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 9, 1998, pp. 121-128.
Larsson et al., “Bone response to surface modified titanium implants: studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology,” Biomaterials, vol. 15, No. 13, 1994, pp. 1062-1074 and “Erratum,” Biomaterials, vol. 16, No. 5, 1995, pp. 423.
Bordji et al, “Cytocompatibility of Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-5Al-2.5Fe Alloys According to Three Surface Treatments, Using Human Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts,” Biomaterials, 17 (1990), pp. 929-940.
Sauberlich et al., “Cell culture tests for assaying the tolerance of soft tissue to variously modified titanium surfaces,” Clin. Oral Impl. Res.10:379-393.
Siegel, Richard W., “Creating Nanophase Materials,” Scientific American, Dec. 1996, pp. 74-79.
Klabunde et al., “Nanocrystals as Stoichiometric Reagents with Unique Surface Chemistry,” J. Phys. Chem., 100 (1996), pp. 12142-12153.
Webster et al., “Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics,” J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 51 (2000) pp. 475-783.
De Oliveira et al., “Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells,” Biomaterials, 25 (2004), pp. 403-413.
Webster et al., “Mechanisms of Enhanced Osteoblast Adhesion on Nanophase Alumina Involve Vitronectin,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, pp. 291-307.
Buser et al., “Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface; A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs,” J. Biomed. Mat. Res., 45 (1999) pp. 75-83.
Orthopaedic Basic Science, Chapter 10, “Biomaterials,” Sheldon Simon ed., Alan S. Litsky and Myron Spector, pp. 447-486.
Orthopaedic Basic Science, Chapter 4, “Form and Function of Bone,” Sheldon Simon ed., Frederic S. Kaplan et al., pp. 127-184.
Kawaguchi et al., “Immunocytochemical and Lectin-Gold Characterization of the Interface Between Alveolar Bone and Implanted Hydroxyapatite in the Rat,” Cells and Materials, vol. 3, No. 4, 1993, pp. 337-350.
Webster et al., “Osteoblast Adhesion on Nanophase Ceramics,” Biomaterials, 20 (1990), 1221-1227.
Elias et al., “Enhanced Functions of Osteoblasts on Nanometer Diameter Carbon Fibers,” Biomaterials, 23 (2002), 3279-3287.
Kay et al., “Nanostructured Polymer/Nanophase Ceramic Composites Enhance Osteoblast and Chondrocyte Adhesion,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 8, No. 5, 2002, pp. 753-764.
Webster et al., “Design and Evaluation of Nanophase Alumina for Orthopaedic/Dental Applications,” NanoStructured Materials, vol. 12,1999, pp. 983-986.
Nishiguchi et al, “The effect of heat treatment on bone-bonding ability of alkali-treated titanium,” Biomaterials, 20 (1999), pp. 491-500.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Metallic nanoparticles as orthopedic biomaterial does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Metallic nanoparticles as orthopedic biomaterial, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Metallic nanoparticles as orthopedic biomaterial will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4211634