Metal working – Method of mechanical manufacture – Electrical device making
Reexamination Certificate
1999-12-28
2001-10-02
Young, Lee (Department: 3729)
Metal working
Method of mechanical manufacture
Electrical device making
C337S297000, C337S290000, C257S209000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06295721
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the general field of silicon integrated circuits with particular reference to controlled breaking of connections.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Where circuit density and performance do not have to be fully maximized in an integrated circuit, it is sometimes found expedient to include in the circuit design additional connections, within the circuit wiring, that can be severed, as desired, at a later stage of the manufacturing process. In this way the circuit can be either repaired by removing bad components (assuming redundancy has been built into the system) or, more generally, a set of general purpose circuits can be personalized to perform any of a range of specific functions.
With the advent of the copper damascene process, it has been a natural step to make the fuses out of copper since making the fuse could be combined with making normal wiring. An example of such a prior art structure is schematically illustrated in
FIG. 1. A
layer of field oxide
17
is seen to be covering a silicon substrate including, primarily, a P-well
18
. The two fragments
16
a
and
16
b
of polysilicon wiring would normally be connected to two electrically separate devices but in the fuse arrangement, each is upwardly connected to three levels of dual damascene structures
11
that are embedded in dielectric
10
. These share a common trench (or stripe) portion
12
at their topmost level. This shared topmost level of damascene wiring can thus be used as a fuse.
In order to make connecting copper stripe
12
fusible under the influence of externally directed radiation, most of dielectric material
10
directly above
11
is etched away to form fuse cavity
12
. A small thickness (typically about 8,000 Angstroms)
14
of dielectric is left in place. This residual layer is thick enough to passivate the copper while at the same time being thin enough to allow the fusing beam to pass through with minimum attenuation as well as being thin enough to disintegrate when the fuse is blown i.e. when
12
becomes discontinuous.
There are several problems associated with this method of making a fusible connection within a copper damascene technology. Because copper is a good thermal conductor and because it has a relatively high melting point, the energy needed to fuse the copper is relatively high—typically about 10 microjoules. This makes copper fuses incompatible with existing laser fusing technologies that were developed prior to the wholesale introduction of the copper damascene technology.
An additional problem associated with copper fuses has been the poor passivation qualities of copper oxide. The latter forms on the bottom surface of window
15
after the fuse has been blown and provides a ready source of copper that can rapidly diffuse through the dielectric down to the silicon devices level where it ‘poisons’ them. Of course, the original damascene structure of which the fuse was a part included barrier layers (not shown) that isolated the copper from all other materials, but these protective layers are no longer present in the vicinity of a blown fuse.
Also seen in
FIG. 1
is guard ring
13
. This is series of dummy dual damascene structures that form a ring completely surrounding fuse cavity
15
. Its purpose is to terminate the propagation of cracks in dielectric
10
that may appear after a fuse has been blown. While microcracks will propagate relatively easily through the hard and brittle dielectric, they cease to grow once they encounter the soft metal of the guard ring. We have shown the guard ring for the sake of completeness and, although it is advisable to use one in conjunction with a fuse structure, it has no direct bearing on the present invention.
A routine search of the prior art was conducted but no references teaching the exact process or structure of the present invention were found. Several prior art references that were encountered were, however, found to be of interest. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,801,094, Yew et al. show a copper dual damascene method.
Mitwalsky et al. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,776,826 show a fuse in an upper level metal layer and introduce an extra level of metal below the fuse to prevent propagation of cracks that might form when a fuse is blown. This essentially the protection ring mentioned above.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,795,819 Motsiffet al. describe a process in which the same material is used for both a C4 barrier layer and a fuse. Aluminum is mentioned as one of the materials which can be used in this way. It is, however, important to note that there is no other material present between the aluminum and the copper. As will be seen, the present invention teaches the importance of inserting another metal, such as chromium, between the aluminum and the copper.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,706 Mitwalsky et al. show a fuse link and dummy structures for dual damascene process and BEOL (back end of line). Lee et al. (in U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,060,) and Yaung et al. (in U.S. Pat. No. 5,926,697) show a guard rings around a fuse while in U.S. Pat. No. 5,729,041, Yoo et al. show a protective film for a fuse window.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has been an object of the present invention to provide a fuse structure that is fully compatible with copper damascene technology.
Another object of the present invention has been that said fuse structure also be fully compatible with current (pre-damascene) fusing methods.
A still further object has been that said fuse structure not be susceptible to copper contamination after a fuse has been blown.
Yet another object of the invention has been to provide a process for manufacturing said fuse structure.
These objects have been achieved by forming the fuse from a compound layer of aluminum and chromium. These two layers are shaped to form a stripe that bridges a gap between two dual damascene connectors. By controlling the degree of overlap between the stripe and the connectors the conductance of heat from the stripe into the connectors can be varied thereby allowing control of the manner in which the fuse blows when irradiated. Since there is no copper in the fuse material, blowing a fuse does not introduce unprotected copper sources into the structure.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4536951 (1985-08-01), Rhodes
patent: 4933303 (1990-06-01), Mo
patent: 4948755 (1990-08-01), Mo
patent: 5055423 (1991-10-01), Smith
patent: 5246882 (1993-09-01), Hartmann
patent: 5262354 (1993-11-01), Cote
patent: 5466639 (1995-11-01), Ireland
patent: 5589706 (1996-12-01), Mitwalsky et al.
patent: 5635423 (1997-06-01), Huang
patent: 5729041 (1998-03-01), Yoo et al.
patent: 5757060 (1998-05-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5776826 (1998-07-01), Mitwalsky et al.
patent: 5795819 (1998-08-01), Motsiff et al.
patent: 5801094 (1998-09-01), Yew et al.
patent: 5926697 (1999-07-01), Young et al.
patent: 6033939 (2000-03-01), Agarwala
Ackerman Stephen B.
Saile George O.
Smith Sean
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
Young Lee
LandOfFree
Metal fuse in copper dual damascene does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Metal fuse in copper dual damascene, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Metal fuse in copper dual damascene will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2588116