Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Display driving control circuitry – Controlling the condition of display elements
Reexamination Certificate
1998-10-29
2002-12-31
Luu, Sy D. (Department: 2174)
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Display driving control circuitry
Controlling the condition of display elements
C345S960000, C399S081000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06501485
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
This invention relates generally to a user interface (“UI”) for a multifunctional printing system and more particularly to a management scheme for the UI which controls a manner in which precoded informational messages are delivered to the UI for displaying selected messages thereon.
Quoting from U.S. Pat. No. 5,079,723 to Herceg et al. (Issued: Jan. 7, 1992);
As reproduction machines such as copiers and printers become more complex and versatile in the jobs they do, the user interface between the machine and the operator or user, which in essence permits the dialogue (i.e., the ability to talk) between operator and machine, must necessarily be expanded if full and efficient utilization of the machine is to be realized. A suitable interface must not only provide the controls, displays, and messages necessary to activate, program, monitor, and maintain the machine, but must do so in an efficient, relatively simple, and straightforward way. For if the user interface fails in this respect, the abilities that were designed and built into the machine and which the machine owner pays for, may never be realized.
As disclosed by the '723 Patent as well as U.S. Pat. No. 5,061,958 to Bunker et al (Issued: Oct. 29, 1991) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,860 to McLaughlin et al. (Issued: Feb. 18, 1997) a user interface (“UI”) can contain a wide range of information impacting the functionality of a corresponding printing system. Most significantly, a UI permits a user to provide the printing system with control information, such as suitable values for attributes. That is, the user typically provides control instructions for parameters associated with everything ranging from image processing to finishing characteristics. As disclosed in the above-mentioned patents, many dialogs may be required to sufficiently program the control instructions for a corresponding printing system. One exemplary way of organizing such dialogs is shown in FIG. 7 of the '860 Patent.
No matter how well organized the dialogs might be, however, relatively complex printing systems typically are associated with complex UIs. This situation is best seen in the area of network printing where information related to multiple printing machines is displayed. U.S. Pat. No. 5,450,571 to Rosekrans et al. (Issued: Sep. 12, 1995) discloses a system in which an interclient job ticket of a network printing arrangement is filtered for the sake of displaying the selections available at a single printer, rather than a plurality of printers. In this way, a user is not burdened with the task of determining which control selections are available at all of the printers in the network printing system, but rather with simply determining what control selections are available at the printer selected by the user.
As further disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,061,958 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,467,434 to Hower et al. (Issued: Nov. 14, 1995), a typical UI will include certain status information relating to selected operational information about a corresponding printing machine. For instance, the dialog in FIG. 4 of the '434 Patent conveys when the system is “Ready to Scan” and/or “Ready to Print”. As further shown in the two above-mentioned patents, the status information is commonly provided in conjunction with control information, while the dialog is partitioned in such a manner that the control information is shown in one section and the status information is shown in another. Commonly, when the control and status information are shown together, the amount of space devoted to the status information is relatively small. Provided that the amount of status information is relatively minimal, then this does not pose a problem. When the amount of status information is relatively large, however, fitting a significant amount of control and status information on a single screen can be challenging.
When using a multifunctional printing machine with many services and a relatively small display screen, it may be impossible to fit all of the status information on a display screen with accompanying control information. In one example, this situation is handled by rotating status messages on a timed basis. That is, one status message is displayed during one time interval, while another status message is displayed during another time interval. This can be annoying to a user and even counterproductive if the user misses a status message because s/he is concentrating on programming control related attributes rather than observing the timed status message currently being displayed.
Moreover, multifunctional printing machines can possess a significant number of services, e.g. print, copy, fax, and filing services, and hence generate a variety of interfering status messages. For example, a group of messages associated with the print service (which is often network oriented) may have little to do with a set of messages relating to the copy service (which is often locally oriented). Accordingly, displaying messages in a non-ordered manner may be very confusing. For example, displaying a status message relating to one service while programming in another service is not optimal. It is believed that many of the challenges associated with comprehending the full significance of status messages in an easy, straightforward manner could be alleviated by providing a status messaging system in which status messages are displayed in an organized fashion where the particular messages being displayed are logically related to the control information being displayed therewith.
Finally, reconfiguring status message systems can be a very difficult task in view of the way a typical UI messaging system is developed. Commonly, code is written to provide a variety of status messages and that code is then compiled. When UI messaging systems are set up in this manner, it is necessary, for the sake of adding, deleting or changing messages, to alter existing code and then recompile the same. This not a procedure that is accessible to a typical machine owner. It would be desirable to provide a UI messaging system in which the machine owner could readily reconfigure status messages to accommodate for changes in system demand.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the presently disclosed invention there is provided a programmable message storage system for a multifunctional printing system including a printing machine for producing prints from an electronic document stored therewith. The printing machine includes a user interface with a display screen upon which one or more of a plurality of messages can be displayed for providing a user with status information about the printing system. The programmable message storage system, in the plurality of messages are stored, comprises: a configurable database for listing a plurality of message identifiers, the plurality of message identifiers corresponding respectively with the plurality of message; a plurality of code sets corresponding respectively with the plurality of message identifiers, each code set controlling a manner in which a corresponding message is displayed on the display screen; and at least one of the plurality of code sets being user programmable so that, in response to user input, the at least one of the plurality of code sets is reconfigured in the database for changing the manner in which the message corresponding with the at least one of the plurality of codes sets is displayed as a function of said reconfiguring.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5061958 (1991-10-01), Bunker et al.
patent: 5079723 (1992-01-01), Herceg et al.
patent: 5226112 (1993-07-01), Mensing et al.
patent: 5436730 (1995-07-01), Hube
patent: 5450571 (1995-09-01), Rosekrans et al.
patent: 5467434 (1995-11-01), Hower, Jr. et al.
patent: 5493634 (1996-02-01), Bonk et al.
patent: 5579447 (1996-11-01), Salgado
patent: 5604860 (1997-02-01), McLaughlin et al.
patent: 5614993 (1997-03-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5717439 (1998-02-01), Levine et al.
patent: 5877746 (1999-03-01), Parks et al.
patent: 5978559 (1999-11-01), Quinion
Microsoft Outlook 97 (Screen dumps, pp. 1
Dash Robert J.
Irwin Donald
Cohen Gary B.
Luu Sy D.
Spooner Richard F.
Xerox Corporation
LandOfFree
Message management system for a user interface of a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Message management system for a user interface of a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Message management system for a user interface of a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2961498