Message classification using classifiers

Information security – Monitoring or scanning of software or data including attack...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C713S194000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07814545

ABSTRACT:
A system and method are disclosed for improving a statistical message classifier. A message may be tested with a machine classifier, wherein the machine classifier is capable of making a classification on the message. In the event the message is classifiable by the machine classifier, the statistical message classifier is updated according to the reliable classification made by the machine classifier. The message may also be tested with a first classifier. In the event that the message is not classifiable by the first classifier, it is tested with a second classifier, wherein the second classifier is capable of making a second classification. In the event that the message is classifiable by the second classifier, the statistical message classifier is updated according to the second classification.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5768422 (1998-06-01), Yaeger
patent: 6023723 (2000-02-01), McCormick et al.
patent: 6112227 (2000-08-01), Heiner
patent: 6199102 (2001-03-01), Cobb
patent: 6421709 (2002-07-01), McCormick et al.
patent: 6650890 (2003-11-01), Irlam et al.
patent: 6675162 (2004-01-01), Russell-Falla et al.
patent: 6778941 (2004-08-01), Worrell et al.
patent: 6779021 (2004-08-01), Bates et al.
patent: 6785728 (2004-08-01), Schneider et al.
patent: 6810404 (2004-10-01), Ferguson et al.
patent: 6941348 (2005-09-01), Petry et al.
patent: 7222157 (2007-05-01), Sutton et al.
patent: 2002/0199095 (2002-12-01), Bandini et al.
patent: 2003/0088627 (2003-05-01), Rothwell et al.
patent: 2003/0195937 (2003-10-01), Kircher et al.
patent: 2003/0204569 (2003-10-01), Andrews et al.
patent: 2003/0233418 (2003-12-01), Goldman
patent: 2004/0024639 (2004-02-01), Goldman
patent: 2004/0117648 (2004-06-01), Kissel
patent: 2004/0128355 (2004-07-01), Chao et al.
patent: 2004/0158554 (2004-08-01), Trottman
patent: 2004/0167964 (2004-08-01), Rounthwaite et al.
patent: 2004/0177110 (2004-09-01), Rounthwaite et al.
patent: 2004/0177120 (2004-09-01), Kirsch
patent: 2004/0181581 (2004-09-01), Kosco
patent: 2004/0260776 (2004-12-01), Starbuck et al.
patent: 2004/0267886 (2004-12-01), Malik
patent: 2005/0015626 (2005-01-01), Chasin
patent: 2005/0055410 (2005-03-01), Landsman et al.
patent: 2005/0125667 (2005-06-01), Sullivan et al.
patent: 2008/0104186 (2008-05-01), Wieneke et al.
patent: 2009/0132669 (2009-05-01), Milliken et al.
Dwork, Cynthia, et al. “Pricing via Processing or Combating Junk Mail,” CRYPTO '92, Springer-Verlag LNCS 740, pp. 139-147, 1992.
Von Ahn, Luis, et al., “Telling Humans and COmputers Apart (Automatically) or How Lazy Cryptographers do AI,” Communications to the ACM, Feb. 2004.
Skoll, David F., “How to Make Sure a Human is Sending You Mail,” Google Groups Thread (Nov. 17, 1996).
Byrne, Julian, “My Spamblock,” Google Groups Thread (Jan. 19, 1997).
Guilmette, Ronald F., “To Mung or Not to Mung,” Google Groups Thread (Jul. 24, 1997).
Templeton, Brad, “Viking-12 Junk E-Mail Blocker,” (believed to have last been updated Jul. 15, 2003).
“Majordomo FAQ,” Oct. 20, 2001.
Langberg, Mike, “Spam Foe Needs Filter of Himself,” (Email Thread Dated Apr. 5, 2003).
McCullagh, Declan, “In-Boxes that Fight Back,” News.com, May 19, 2003.
Gabrilovich et al., “The Homograph Attack”, Communications of the ACM, 45(2):128, Feb. 2002.
Cranor, Lorrie, et al., “Spam!,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, Issue 8, pp. 74-83, Aug. 1998.
Jung, Jaeyeon, et al., “An Empirical Study of Spam Traffic and the Use of DNS Black Lists,” IMC'04, Taormina, Sicily, Italy, Oct. 25-27, 2004.
Weinstein, Lauren, “Spam Wars,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, Issue 8, p. 136, Aug. 2003.
Gomes, Luiz, et al., “Characterizing a Spam Traffic,” in the Proc. of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, Sicily, Italy, pp. 356-369, 2004.
Balvanz, Jeff, et al., “Spam Software Evaluation, Training, and Support: Fighting Back to Reclaim the Email Inbox,” in the Proc. of the 32nd Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services, Baltimore, MD, pp. 385-387, 2004.
Paul Graham, “A Plan for Spam,” 2004 Spam Conference, Cambridge, MA: http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html.
“Will Filters Kill Spam?” Dec. 2002: http://www.paulgraham.com/wfks.html.
Paul Graham, “Better Bayesian Filtering,” 2003 Spam Conference, Cambridge, MA: http:///www.paulgraham.com/better.html.
Patrick Pantel, et al., “SpamCop: A Spam Classification & Organization Program,” Mar. 11, 1998, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Jason Rennie, “ifile v.0.1 Alpha,” Aug. 3, 1996, Carnegie Mellon University: http://www.ai.mit.edu/˜jrennie/ifile/oldREADME-0.1A.
William S. Yerazunis, “Sparse Binary Polynomial Hashing and the CRM114 Discriminator,” 2003 Spam Conference, Cambridge, MA.
Mehran Sahami, et al., “A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail,” Proceedings of AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, Jul. 1998.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Message classification using classifiers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Message classification using classifiers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Message classification using classifiers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4238737

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.