Medical device configuration based on sensed brain signals

Surgery: light – thermal – and electrical application – Light – thermal – and electrical application – Electrical therapeutic systems

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07983757

ABSTRACT:
The invention is directed to techniques and systems in which external brain monitoring is used to facilitate implantation and configuration of an implantable medical device. The techniques may create an open loop or closed loop system in which brain signals quantify the efficacy of electrical logical stimulation (or drug therapy via an implantable drug pump) at locations outside of the brain. The techniques may be used to improve placement of leads and electrodes during an implantation procedure, and/or to select or adjust stimulation parameters either during the implantation procedure or possibly following implantation of an implantable medical device. The described techniques have applications for the alleviation of pain, but may find other applications where EEG signals can quantify the efficacy of treatment via an implantable medical device.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3646940 (1972-03-01), Timm et al.
patent: 3724467 (1973-04-01), Avery et al.
patent: 5702429 (1997-12-01), King
patent: 5814092 (1998-09-01), King
patent: 5913882 (1999-06-01), King
patent: 6018675 (2000-01-01), Apkarian et al.
patent: 6066163 (2000-05-01), John
patent: 6067467 (2000-05-01), John
patent: 6463328 (2002-10-01), John
patent: 6907280 (2005-06-01), Becerra et al.
patent: 7174215 (2007-02-01), Bradley
patent: 2002/0042563 (2002-04-01), Becerra et al.
patent: 2003/0100931 (2003-05-01), Mullett
patent: 2004/0096089 (2004-05-01), Borsook et al.
patent: 2005/0004489 (2005-01-01), Sarkela et al.
patent: 2005/0020905 (2005-01-01), Siddall et al.
patent: 2006/0015153 (2006-01-01), Gliner et al.
patent: 2006/0089551 (2006-04-01), England
patent: 2006/0135881 (2006-06-01), Giftakis et al.
patent: 2006/0241374 (2006-10-01), George et al.
patent: 2007/0032834 (2007-02-01), Gliner et al.
patent: 2007/0179557 (2007-08-01), Maschino et al.
patent: 2007/0179558 (2007-08-01), Gliner et al.
patent: 2007/0213783 (2007-09-01), Pless
patent: 2008/0114417 (2008-05-01), Leyde
patent: 2009/0131995 (2009-05-01), Sloan et al.
patent: WO 02/38031 (2002-05-01), None
patent: WO 03/066157 (2003-08-01), None
patent: WO 2006/071891 (2006-07-01), None
patent: WO 2007/111725 (2007-10-01), None
Sarnthein et al., “Increased EEG power and slowed dominant frequency in patients with neurogenic pain,” Brain, vol. 129, No. 1, pp. 55-64, Jan. 2006.
Apkarian et al., “Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease,” Eur J Pain 9, pp. 463-484 (2005).
Apkarian et al., “Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density,” J Neurosci 24, pp. 10410-10415 (2004).
Baliki et al., “Chronic pain and the emotional brain: specific brain activity associated with spontaneous fluctuations of intensity of chronic back pain,” J Neurosci 26, pp. 12165-12173 (2006).
Baliki et al., “Beyond feeling: chronic pain hurts the brain, disrupting the default-mode network dynamics,” J Neurosci 28, pp. 1398-1403 (2008).
Blair et al., “Dorsal column stimulation. Its effect on the somatosensory evoked response,” Arch Neurol 32, pp. 826-829 (1975).
Blamire et al., “Axonal damange in the spinal cord of multiple sclerosis patients detected by magnetic resonance spectroscopy,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 58, pp. 880-885 (2007).
Borsook et al., “Neuroimaging revolutionizes therapeutic approaches to chronic pain,” Mol Pain 3, p. 25 (2007).
Chen et al., Advances in brain imaging of neuropathic pain, Chin Med J (Engl) 121, pp. 653-657 (2008).
Clavo et al., “Cerebral blood flow increase in cancer patients by applying cervical spinal cord stimulation,” Neurocirugia (Astur) 18, pp. 28-32 (2007).
El-Khoury et al., “Attenuation of neuropathic pain by segmental and supraspinal activation of the dorsal column system in awake rats,” Neuroscience 112, pp. 541-553 (2002).
Grachev et al., “Abnormal brain chemistry in chronic back pain: an in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study,” Pain 89, pp. 7-18 (2000).
Keshari et al., “Lactic acid and proteoglycans as metabolic markers for discogenic back pain,” Spine 33, pp. 312-317 (2008).
Kiriakopoulos et al., “Functional magnetic resonance imaging: a potential tool for the evaluation of spinal cord stimulation: technical case report.” Neurosurgery 41, pp. 501-504 (1997).
Marliani et al., “Quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human cervical spinal cord at 3 Tesla,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 57, pp. 160-163 (2007).
Meyerson et al., “Mode of action of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain,” J Pain Symptom Manage 31, pp. S6-12 (2006).
Nagamachi et al., “Alteration of regional cerebral blood flow in patients with chronic pain—evaluation before and after epidural spinal cord stimulation,” Ann Nucl Med 20, pp. 303-310 (2006).
Oakley et al., “Spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms of action,” Spine 27, pp. 2574-2583, (2002).
Peyron et al., “Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis,” Neurophysiol Clin 30, pp. 263-288 (2000).
Polacek et al., “Effects of spinal cord stimulation on the cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in failed back surgery syndrome patients,” Clin Neurophysiol 118, pp. 1291-1302 (2007).
Rees et al., “Aninociceptive effects of dorsal column stimulations in the rat: involvement of the anterior pretectal nucleus,” J Physiol 417, pp. 375-388 (1989).
Schlaier et al., “Effects of spinal cord stimulation on cortical excitability in patients with chronic neuropathic pain: A pilot study,” Eur J Pain 11, pp. 863-868 (2007).
Schulman et al, “Thalamocortical dysrhythmia syndrome: MEG imaging of neuropathic pain,” Thalamus & Related Systems 3(1), pp. 33-39 (2005).
Siddall et al., “Magnetic resonance spectroscopy detects biochemical changes in the brain associated with chronic low back pain: a preliminary report,” Anesth Analg 102, pp. 1164-1168 (2006).
Sindou et al., “Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for long-lasting pain relief after spinal cord stimulation: practical use for patient selection,” Neurosurgery 52, pp. 1374-1383 (2003).
Singer, E. “The Brain in Chronic Pain,” Technology Review, Inc., http://www.technologyreview.com, 4 pgs. (2007).
Smith, K. “Brain waves reveal intensity of pain,” Nature (News) 450, p. 329 (2007).
Sorensen et al., “Differences in metabolites in pain-processing brain regions in patients with diabetes and painful neuropathy,” Diabetes Care 31, pp. 980-981 (2008).
Stancak et al., “Functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral activation during spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients,” Eur J. Pain, 12 pgs. (2007).
Stephenson et al., “Neuroimaging of Pain: Advances and Future Prospects,” J Pain, 13 pgs. (2007).
Theuvenet et al., “Responses to median and tibial nerve stimulation in patients with chronic neuropathic pain,” Brain Topogr 11, pp. 305-313 (1999).
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration,” dated Nov. 7, 2008 for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/073424 (13 pgs.).
“Notification of Transmittal of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” dated Jan. 25, 2010 for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/073424 (11 pgs.).
Reply to Written Opinion dated Mar. 13, 2009 for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/073424 (13 pgs.).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Medical device configuration based on sensed brain signals does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Medical device configuration based on sensed brain signals, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Medical device configuration based on sensed brain signals will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2627854

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.