Media sensors for a printer

Details Media sensors for a printer Media sensors for a printer

1998-10-30

2001-03-13

Allen, Stephone B. (Department: 2878)

Radiant energy

Photocells; circuits and apparatus

With circuit for evaluating a web, strand, strip, or sheet

C400S708000, C250S559440, C250S227110

Reexamination Certificate

active

06201255

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention is generally directed to media sensors for a printer.
It is well known in the prior art to provide a thermal barcode printer, operating in a “peel mode”, with a take label sensor to detect the presence or absence of an output label. Peel mode is the printer mode which has the printer separating (peeling) a label from a continuous backing and presenting it to the user. The take label sensor is usually located somewhere after the printline. When a label is printed, it is presented, and in some manner activates/de-activates the take label sensor. Only one label is printed at a time. The sensor signal is then used internally by the printer to prohibit printing the next label until the label just printed is removed. The sensor signal may also be used to provide an operator with a visual cue to remove the label. Once the label is removed, the sensor signal changes into its opposite state which cues the printer to allow for the next label to be printed.
Line card or off-the-shelf sensors of a similar type are abundant and used very often where paper handling occurs—copiers, printers, paper shredders, sheet feeders etc. However, most of these sensors are unsuitable for a thermal barcode printer application because they usually have a short sensing capability, or are limited by their mechanical configuration within the application. Thus usually a custom solution is implemented for a thermal barcode printer.
Previously, the most common method of take label sensing in a thermal barcode printer application is as shown in
FIG. 47. A
detector
14
and an emitter
12
are positioned one above and one below the presented label
22
. They are mechanically aligned and usually relatively far apart. The distance required depends upon how easy one wants to load media and ribbon. If they are too close, loading media and ribbon may be difficult. If they are too far, sensor alignment may be a problem. Typical distances are 3-6 inches apart.
When no media is present, the detector
14
senses the emitter's output—the beam
28
. When media is present, it breaks the beam (the detector no longer sees the beam). When the presented label
22
is removed, the detector
14
again sees the beam. This difference in sensor signal for beam presence vs. beam absence is the method in which the system detects if a label is present or not.
This “transmissive” method of sensing has the advantage of being less susceptible to media type variations than “reflective” sensing methods because it does not place dependence upon the reflectivity of the media. However, it has disadvantages related to its mechanics. It is more difficult to align the emitter
12
and detector
14
because of the separation distances involved. It also requires electronics outside of the electronics cabinet of the printer which means extra parts including connectors, wire or cable assemblies, mounting brackets and associated hardware. In addition, it presents an obstacle to loading ribbon and media in the printer since the emitter
12
and detector
14
both protrude near the thermal transfer ribbon and media paths. Care must be taken to avoid these obstacles when loading the printer with supplies.
FIG. 48
shows another prior art variation of the transmissive method of take label sensing. It has the emitter
12
and detector
14
mounted inside the electronic enclosure
30
with two light pipes
16
,
17
(aligned with the emitter
12
and detector
14
, respectively) outside of the enclosure
30
bending the beam
28
at ninety degrees to create a beam
28
perpendicular to the label
22
presented. This method only improves upon the first method by removing the disadvantage of having electronic parts outside of the electronics enclosure
30
. The other advantages and disadvantages mentioned above for the transmissive technique remain the same.
Both transmissive methods discussed can have the emitter
12
and detector
14
in either the upper or lower position interchangeably. However, the detector in the upper position makes it less susceptible to ambient light.
FIG. 49
shows yet another prior art method which uses a reflective sensor
11
to determine label presence.
The sensor
11
can be located either above or below the presented label
22
. The advantage of this type of sensor
11
is that it may be slightly easier to position in a manner which will not interfere with media or ribbon loading because it is a single contained unit. This method, however, has the disadvantage of being very susceptible to errors due to media variations. It counts on the media to reflect the beam back to the detector. Thus differences in reflectivity of the label in this system can have a profound negative impact on the sensor operation. In addition, label print can cause an additional problem for sensors mounted above the presented label
22
. This method typically requires the sensor
11
to be close to the presented label
22
which may still present mounting difficulties. The sensor electronics are again mounted outside of the electronics enclosure, thereby having the disadvantage of additional connectors, wire/cable assemblies, brackets, and associated hardware.
Some type of media sensor is always present on a thermal barcode printer. In general, a media sensor is used to align the printhead means with the label media in order to make sure the labels are printed properly. Other devices that handle labels such as rewinders and applicators may also require a media sensor for sensing the position of the labels that are usually mounted on a continuous backing material, known as a liner or web. The labels are usually positioned on the backing and separated by a small (typically ⅛″) gap. For a printer to properly position the print information on the label it must detect the location of this inter-label gap.
The most common way to detect the inter-label gap is to sense the difference in transmissive density of the backing versus the label-backing combination. This type of sensing employs a light source on one side of the print media and a light sensor on the other side of the media. Light emitting diodes are generally used as the light source, and photo transistors are usually used as the sensor.
The media sensor of a thermal bar code printer is normally located somewhere along the media path, before the printhead means. Most printers offer a movable sensor to accommodate a variety of media, because “mark” locations on the media vary. The “mark” is usually the inter-label gap on a roll of media, a notched portion of the media related to the start of the label, or some other indicia or device which can be sensed by the media sensor. These “marks” are easily distinguishable to the user.
Early methods of media sensing had both the emitter and detector movable. Both parts had to be aligned with each other, as well as with the “mark” on the media. A visual marking on each part aided the user to align the sensors. However, because of the “buried” nature of these components (i.e., interference from other printer components and from the media itself), and because of the distances between them and the media, it was difficult to line up the sensor itself, and difficult to line it up with the “mark”.
FIG. 50
shows a form of this transmissive approach. Since the width and shape of the media may vary, the sensing location must be movable. Also, pre-printed areas on the label can cause variations in the transmissive density of the media. A movable sensor allows avoidance of these areas. The mechanism of
FIG. 50
has a movable light source
2
below the media
4
, and a movable sensor
6
above the media. The user must make sure that the two are aligned for proper sensing.
In
FIG. 51
, the lower and upper components
2
and
6
, respectively, of the media sensor are linked by a mechanical system. This provides for automatic alignment of the emitter
2
and detector
6
, but requires increased complexity and cost. Moreover, this type of prior art media sensor still requires some mechanical work for alignment wit

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Media sensors for a printer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Media sensors for a printer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Media sensors for a printer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2449532