Measurement of evoked neural response

Surgery: light – thermal – and electrical application – Light – thermal – and electrical application – Electrical therapeutic systems

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C607S055000, C381S312000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07809445

ABSTRACT:
A method and device for measuring an evoked neural response comprising a sensor (25) for obtaining a sensed signal representing the evoked neural response, a high gain amplifier (30) having a signal input (31) for receiving the sensed signal and having a reference input (32), and means for altering or setting a reference voltage at the reference input (32) to prevent the amplifier (30) saturating with variations of the sensed signal.

REFERENCES:
patent: 452003 (1891-05-01), Lipe
patent: 3043000 (1962-07-01), Hatfield
patent: D227118 (1973-06-01), Muraoka
patent: 3771685 (1973-11-01), Micallef
patent: 4003521 (1977-01-01), Hess
patent: 4114627 (1978-09-01), Lewyn et al.
patent: 4226164 (1980-10-01), Carter
patent: 4240428 (1980-12-01), Akhavi
patent: 4305396 (1981-12-01), Wittkampf et al.
patent: 4343312 (1982-08-01), Cals et al.
patent: D267541 (1983-01-01), Kanemitsu et al.
patent: 4373531 (1983-02-01), Wittkampf et al.
patent: 4414701 (1983-11-01), Johnson
patent: 4532930 (1985-08-01), Crosby et al.
patent: 4543956 (1985-10-01), Herscovici
patent: 4610621 (1986-09-01), Taber et al.
patent: 4731718 (1988-03-01), Sheu et al.
patent: 4895152 (1990-01-01), Callaghan et al.
patent: 4917504 (1990-04-01), Scott et al.
patent: 4920679 (1990-05-01), Sarles et al.
patent: 5014592 (1991-05-01), Zweig et al.
patent: 5016280 (1991-05-01), Engebretson et al.
patent: 5034918 (1991-07-01), Jeong et al.
patent: 5172690 (1992-12-01), Nappholz et al.
patent: 5278994 (1994-01-01), Black et al.
patent: D348067 (1994-06-01), Lucey et al.
patent: 5565503 (1996-10-01), Garcia et al.
patent: 5674264 (1997-10-01), Carter et al.
patent: 5758651 (1998-06-01), Nygard et al.
patent: 5775652 (1998-07-01), Crawshaw et al.
patent: 5785477 (1998-07-01), McGuffey et al.
patent: 5895416 (1999-04-01), Barreras, Sr. et al.
patent: 5963904 (1999-10-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5971334 (1999-10-01), Crawshaw et al.
patent: 5999856 (1999-12-01), Kennedy
patent: 6035001 (2000-03-01), Eklund et al.
patent: 6044162 (2000-03-01), Mead et al.
patent: 6073973 (2000-06-01), Boscaljon et al.
patent: 6151400 (2000-11-01), Seligman
patent: 6157861 (2000-12-01), Faltys et al.
patent: 6205360 (2001-03-01), Carter et al.
patent: 6428484 (2002-08-01), Battmer et al.
patent: 6430402 (2002-08-01), Agahi-Kesheh
patent: 6463328 (2002-10-01), John
patent: 6537200 (2003-03-01), Leysieffer et al.
patent: 6571676 (2003-06-01), Folsom et al.
patent: 6575894 (2003-06-01), Leysieffer et al.
patent: 6600955 (2003-07-01), Zierhofer
patent: 6697674 (2004-02-01), Leysieffer
patent: 6751505 (2004-06-01), Van Den Honert et al.
patent: 6892092 (2005-05-01), Palreddy et al.
patent: 2001/0049466 (2001-12-01), Leysieffer et al.
patent: 2004/0098063 (2004-05-01), Goetz
patent: 2005/0101878 (2005-05-01), Daly et al.
patent: 2005/0245991 (2005-11-01), Faltys et al.
patent: 0282336 (1988-09-01), None
patent: 0414579 (1934-08-01), None
patent: 2266045 (1993-10-01), None
patent: 9210134 (1992-06-01), None
patent: WO 92/10134 (1992-06-01), None
patent: 9324176 (1993-12-01), None
patent: 9414376 (1994-07-01), None
patent: WO 94/14376 (1994-07-01), None
patent: 9501709 (1995-01-01), None
patent: 9612383 (1996-04-01), None
patent: 9709863 (1997-03-01), None
patent: 9748447 (1997-12-01), None
patent: 0076436 (2000-12-01), None
patent: 0113991 (2001-03-01), None
patent: 02082982 (2002-10-01), None
patent: 03070322 (2003-08-01), None
patent: 2004021885 (2004-03-01), None
Brown, et al., The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults, Ear and Hearing, vol. 21 (2), Apr. 2000, pp. 151-163.
Charasse, et al., “Automatic analysis of auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential with an artificial neural network,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2004 31, 221-229.
Delgado, et al., “Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Interpretation,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Apr./May 1994.
Charasse, et al., “Comparison of Two Different Methods to Automatically Classify Auditory Nerve Responses Recorded with NRT System,” Acta Acustica United with Acustica, vol. 99 (2004) 512-519.
Seyle, et al., “Speech Perception Using Maps Based on Neural Response Telemetry Measures,” Ear & Hearing, Copyright © 2002 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Vannier, et al., “Objective detection of brainstem auditory evoked potentials with a priori information from higher presentation levels,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 25, (2002) 283-301.
Franck, et al., “Estimation of Psychophysical Levels Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Measured with the Neural Response Telemetry Capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's C124M Device,” Ear & Hearing, Copyright © 2001 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Dijk et al., “Development of a Prototype Fully-Automated Intra-Operative ECAP Recording Tool, Using NRT(TM) v3,” 2003 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses (Asilomar), 2003, 7 pages total.
Hughes, et al, Comparison of EAP Thresholds with MAP Levels in the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant: Data from Children [Articles], Ear and Hearing, vol. 21 (2), Apr. 2000, pp. 164-174.
Abbas et al., “Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recorded from Subjects Who Use the Nucleus CI24M Device,” 2000, Gantz et al. Seventh Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children, pp. 6-9.
Baumgarte, et al., “A Nonlinear Psychoacoustic Model Applied to the ISO MPEG Layer 3 Coder,” Proc. 99th Conv. Aud. Eng. Soc., New York, NY, Oct. 1995, preprint 4087.
Edler, et al., “ASAC-Analysis/Synthesis Audio Codec for Very Low Bit Rates,” Proc. 100th Conv. Aud. Eng. Soc., May 1996, preprint 4179.
Cohen, et al., “Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking,” Hearing Research, 179 (2003) 72-87.
Cohen, et al., “Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients,” International Journal of Audiology 2004: 43: 346-355.
Miller, et al., “An Improved Method of Reducing Stimulus Artifact in the Electrically Evoked Whole-Nerve Potential,” Ear & Hearing, Copyright © 2000 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA.
European Search Report, EP 01 95 9971, dated Aug. 11, 2005.
International Preliminary Examination Report, PCT/AU01/01032, dated Apr. 10, 2002.
International Search Report, PCT/AU01/01032, dated Oct. 5, 2001.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US05/21207 dated Feb. 8, 2006.
International Preliminary Examination Report, PCT/AU02/00500, dated Feb. 12, 2003.
International Search Report, PCT/AU02/00500, dated Jun. 26, 2002.
Supplementary Partial European Search Report, EP 02 71 7863 dated Oct. 18, 2005.
Hartmann, et al., “Evoked Potentials from the Auditory Nerve Following Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation of the Cochlea: New Possibilities for Preoperative Testing in Cochlear-Implant Candidates?” Acta Otoloaryngol (Stockh) 1994; 114, Scandinavian University Press ISSN 0001-648, pp. 495-500.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Measurement of evoked neural response does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Measurement of evoked neural response, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Measurement of evoked neural response will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4175498

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.