Radiation imagery chemistry: process – composition – or product th – Radiation modifying product or process of making – Radiation mask
Reexamination Certificate
1999-05-28
2001-02-13
Rosasco, S. (Department: 1756)
Radiation imagery chemistry: process, composition, or product th
Radiation modifying product or process of making
Radiation mask
Reexamination Certificate
active
06187483
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to photolithography process development, and more particularly relates to a method of selecting one of various available mask fabrication processes based upon an application of a metric to a two-dimensional Fourier space representation of mask patterns which are manufactured by the various mask fabrication processes and using the metric to select a particular mask fabrication process.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The minimum feature sizes of integrated circuits are continuously decreasing in order to increase the packing density of the various semiconductor devices formed thereby. With this size reduction, however, various steps within the integrated circuit fabrication process become more difficult. One such area within the semiconductor fabricating process which experiences unique challenges as feature sizes shrink is photolithography.
Photolithography involves selectively exposing regions of a resist-coated silicon wafer to form a radiation pattern thereon. Once exposure is complete, the exposed resist is developed in order to selectively expose and protect the various regions on the silicon wafer defined by the exposure pattern (e.g., silicon regions in the substrate, polysilicon on the substrate, or insulating layers such as silicon dioxide).
An integral component of a photolithography or pattern transfer system is a reticle (often called a mask) which includes a pattern thereon corresponding to features to be formed in a layer on the substrate. A reticle typically includes a transparent glass plate covered with a patterned light blocking material such as chrome. The reticle is placed between a radiation source producing radiation of a pre-selected wavelength (e.g., ultraviolet light) and a focusing lens which may form part of a stepper apparatus. Placed beneath the stepper is the resist-covered silicon wafer. When the radiation from the radiation source is directed onto the reticle, light passes through the glass (in the regions not containing the chrome mask patterns) and projects onto the resist-covered silicon wafer. In this manner, an image of the reticle is transferred to the resist.
The resist (sometimes referred to as the “photoresist”) is provided as a thin layer of radiation-sensitive material that is typically spin-coated over the entire silicon wafer surface. The resist material is classified as either positive or negative depending on how it responds to the light radiation. Positive resist, when exposed to radiation becomes more soluble and is thus more easily removed in a development process. As a result, a developed positive resist contains a resist pattern corresponding to the dark regions on the reticle. Negative resist, in contrast, becomes less soluble when exposed to radiation. Consequently, a developed negative resist contains a pattern corresponding to the transparent regions of the reticle. For simplicity, the following discussion will describe only positive resists, but it should be understood that negative resists may be substituted therefor.
An exemplary prior art reticle is illustrated in FIG.
1
. Prior art
FIG. 1
includes a reticle
10
corresponding to a desired integrated circuit pattern
12
. For simplicity, the pattern
12
consists of only two design mask patterns. A clear reticle glass
14
allows radiation to project onto a resist covered silicon wafer. The chrome regions
16
and
18
on the reticle
10
block radiation to generate an image on the wafer corresponding to the desired integrated circuit design features.
As light passes through the reticle
10
, it is refracted and scattered by the edges of the chrome
16
and
18
. This causes the projected image to exhibit some rounding and other optical distortion. While such effects pose relatively little difficulty in layouts with large features (e.g., features with critical dimensions greater than one micron), they can not be ignored in present day circuit layouts where critical dimensions are about 0.25 micron or smaller. The problem highlighted above becomes even more pronounced in integrated circuit designs having feature sizes near the wavelength of the radiation used in the photolithographic process.
Prior art
FIG. 2
illustrates the impact of the diffraction and scattering caused by the radiation passing through the reticle
10
and onto a section of a photoresist covered silicon substrate
20
. As illustrated, the illumination pattern on the substrate
20
contains an illuminated region
22
and two dark regions
24
and
26
corresponding to the chrome regions
16
and
18
on the reticle
10
. The illuminated pattern
22
, however, exhibits considerable distortion, with the dark regions
24
and
26
having their comers
28
rounded. Unfortunately, any distorted illumination pattern propagates through the developed resist pattern and negatively impacts the integrated circuit features such as polysilicon gate regions, vias in dielectrics, etc. As a result, the integrated circuit performance is degraded.
To remedy this problem, a reticle correction technique known as optical proximity correction (OPC) has been developed. OPC involves the adding of dark regions to and/or the subtracting of dark regions from portions of a reticle to overcome the distorting effects of diffraction and scattering. Typically, OPC is performed on a digital representation of a desired integrated circuit pattern. This digital representation is often referred to as the mask layout data and is used by the reticle manufacturer to generate the reticle. First, the mask layout data is evaluated with software to identify regions where optical distortion will result. Then the OPC is applied to compensate for the distortion. The resulting pattern is ultimately transferred to the reticle glass.
Prior art
FIG. 3
illustrates how OPC may be employed to modify the reticle design illustrated in FIG.
1
and thereby provide more accurately the desired illumination pattern at the substrate. As shown, an OPC-corrected reticle
30
includes two features
32
and
34
outlined in chrome on the glass plate
36
. Various corrections
38
have been added to the base features. Some correction takes the form of “serifs.” Serifs are typically small, appendage-type addition or subtraction regions typically made at corner regions or other areas on reticle designs.
Prior art
FIG. 4
illustrates an illumination pattern
50
produced on a photoresist covered wafer surface
52
by radiation passing through the reticle
30
of prior art FIG.
3
. As shown, the illuminated region includes a light region
54
surrounding a set of dark regions
56
and
58
which substantially faithfully represent the desired pattern illustrated in prior art FIG.
1
. Note that the illumination pattern
22
of prior art
FIG. 2
which was not produced with a reticle having OPC (reticle
10
) has been improved greatly by the reticle
30
having OPC.
Although OPC designs provide performance improvements over features which do not employ OPC as illustrated in prior art
FIGS. 1-4
, presently there is not a usable method for determining whether one type of OPC design is better than another. That is, it is difficult to determine which OPC design is the optimal design for a given feature even with the most advanced simulation equipment. As illustrated in prior art
FIG. 5
, a feature
60
on a mask
62
has a core portion
64
with an OPC design
66
applied thereto. The OPC design
66
, however, may include different types of serifs
68
a,
68
b
of various dimensions at various locations about the feature
60
. For example, the serif
68
a
may attach to the core portion
64
at various points and thus may vary substantially in its dimensions. In addition, the serif
68
b
may have a variable width, a variable length, and may exist at various distances away from the core portion
64
. Presently, however, there is not an efficient way of evaluating whether one type of OPC design is better than another in achieving its goal, namely to produce a feature on a substrate which substantially appro
Capodieci Luigi
Spence Christopher A.
Advanced Micro Devices , Inc.
Amin, Eschweiler & Turocy, LLP
Rosasco S.
LandOfFree
Mask quality measurements by fourier space analysis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Mask quality measurements by fourier space analysis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mask quality measurements by fourier space analysis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2579309