Aeronautics and astronautics – Missile stabilization or trajectory control – Automatic guidance
Reexamination Certificate
2002-01-31
2002-10-22
Gregory, Bernarr E. (Department: 3662)
Aeronautics and astronautics
Missile stabilization or trajectory control
Automatic guidance
C244S003100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06467722
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Historically, missile flight direction control has been achieved by using thrust vector control (TVC), jet reaction control (JRC), canard control or tail fin control. However, each of these control methods has significant disadvantages. For example, even though TVC systems provide high controllability with minimal drag force, they are only effective during the boost portion of the flight. JRC systems can provide control during the entire flight and also have very low drag, but are limited by the amount of propellant that can be packaged in the missile. Canard and tail fin controls enable excellent controllability provided that the missile velocity is sufficient. The disadvantage is that canard and tail fin control systems can result in excessive drag.
Currently, there no known missiles that utilize deflection of the missile nosecone for controlling their flight paths.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The Magnetostrictive Missile Guidance System (MMGS) uses a movable nosecone that pivots about a single multi-directional joint on the missile axis in order to produce aerodynamic control forces for missile flight path control. The missile nosecone is driven by magnetostrictive materials in conjunction with a displacement amplification device. The determination of the nosecone deflection angle that is necessary to achieve any change in the flight path is made by a sensing device that produces position signals and a guidance computer that produces command signals for the desired flight path. The sensing device located in the nosecone senses the current position of the nosecone and this position signal is compared with the command signal by the computer to yield an error signal, which is indicative of the difference between the two input signals. Then appropriate magnetic field is applied to the magnetostrictive materials to cause them to grow in length and deflect the nosecone until the error signal is eliminated.
The significant control authority enabled by MMGS is available during both boost and coast, all without the disadvantage of excessive drag.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2594766 (1952-04-01), Goddard
patent: 3262655 (1966-07-01), Gillespie, Jr.
patent: 3955046 (1976-05-01), Ingham et al.
patent: 3977629 (1976-08-01), Tubeuf
patent: 4399962 (1983-08-01), Wedertz et al.
patent: 4431147 (1984-02-01), Paley
patent: 4579298 (1986-04-01), Thomson
patent: 4793571 (1988-12-01), Kranz
patent: 5139216 (1992-08-01), Larkin
patent: 5322248 (1994-06-01), Ragab
patent: 5593109 (1997-01-01), Williams
patent: 5708232 (1998-01-01), Nedderman, Jr.
patent: 6364248 (2002-04-01), Spate et al.
TESS listing for the Trademark “ETREMA TERFENOL-D”; Ser. No. 73703116, Registration No. 1512330.*
TESS listing for the Trademark “ETREMA”; Ser. No. 73689817, Registration No. 1507785.
Auman Lamar M.
Berry Roger P.
Cayson Stephen C.
Lawless Daniel F.
Bush Freddie M.
Chang Hay Kyung
Gregory Bernarr E.
The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of
Tischer Arthur H.
LandOfFree
Magnetostrictive missile guidance system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Magnetostrictive missile guidance system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Magnetostrictive missile guidance system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2996710