Metal working – Method of mechanical manufacture – Electrical device making
Patent
1997-05-14
2000-09-05
Nguyen, Tuan N.
Metal working
Method of mechanical manufacture
Electrical device making
29605, 505230, 505917, H01L 3924
Patent
active
061123994
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to mineral separation, and more particularly, to the separation of paramagnetic minerals from nonmagnetic minerals using high gradient magnetic fields.
High gradient magnetic separators have been particularly useful in the kaolin clay industry. Kaolin clay is a nonmagnetic material that, when mined, contains traced quantities of paramagnetic impurities such as titanium dioxide (TiO.sub.2) and iron oxide (FeO.sub.2). The magnetic impurities are removed from the kaolin clay by mixing the clay with water to form a slurry. The slurry is then pumped through a separation container that is subjected to an intense magnetic field and packed with stainless steel wool. The intense magnetic field causes high magnetic field gradients to form around the fibers of the steel wool causing the paramagnetic impurities to be attracted to the steel wool. Over time, the stainless steel wool becomes saturated with a buildup of the paramagnetic impurities, reducing the effectiveness of the magnetic separator. Past developments in magnetic separators have focused on improving the efficiency of generating the magnetic field in the separation container and removing the paramagnetic impurity buildup.
Initially, conventional copper coils were used to generate the magnetic field for mineral separation. Unfortunately, copper coils have a finite resistance and, to maintain a high gradient magnetic field, must be continuously supplied with a large quantities of electrical power. More particularly, in a magnetic solenoid, typical of those used in a magnetic separator, the ampere-turns (NI) of the solenoid are proportional to the desired flux density (B) times the magnetic reluctance () of the solenoid. When an iron casing is used in the regions outside of the solenoid and the separation container and the magnetic field is below about 2 Tesla, most of the magnetic reluctance in the solenoid is caused by an air gap formed by the separation container. Also, magnetic reluctance is proportional to the size of the air gap (G) or, more specifically; the distance between the "pole" faces on the iron casing. An increase in the air gap results in an increase in the necessary current (I) and/or an increase in the number of coil turns (N) if a particular flux density is to be achieved.
The copper coil's resistance is proportional to the diameter of the coil times the number of turns (N). Since power (P) equals current (I) squared times resistance (R), the power required for a conventional copper coil is proportional to the desired magnetic flux density (B), times the gap (G), times the diameter (D), times the current (I). Thus, an increase in diameter in a conventional copper coil results in a directly proportional increase in power, and an advantageous volume increase proportional to the diameter squared. However, an increase in gap (G) results in a directly proportional power increase and a less advantageous, directly proportional volume increase. For these reasons, increasing the air gap in a copper-coil based separator required a large proportional increase in electrical power consumption and, for cost and efficiency reasons, generally was not considered a viable option.
These factors induced magnetic separators using conventional copper coils to be designed to use relatively flat, pancake-like, separation containers. Thus, existing copper coil based magnetic separators typically use a separation container having a diameter from about 213 centimeters (84 inches) to about 305 centimeters (120 inches) and a height of about 50 centimeters (20 inches). The 305 centimeter (120 inches) separation container diameter was considered an improvement over previous containers having a diameter of 84 inches. However, the increased diameter increased the separator's weight from about 226,800 kilograms (250 tons) to about 635,000 kilograms (700 tons). Magnetic saturation of the iron in the casing limited the magnetic field strength within the separation container to about 2 Tesla.
Efforts to reduce the po
REFERENCES:
patent: 3005117 (1961-10-01), Buchhold
patent: 3133144 (1964-05-01), Cottingham et al.
patent: 3360692 (1967-12-01), Kafka
patent: 3503504 (1970-03-01), Bannister
patent: 4033864 (1977-07-01), Nolan et al.
patent: 4046681 (1977-09-01), Marston et al.
patent: 4069705 (1978-01-01), Burr et al.
patent: 4116822 (1978-09-01), Webb
patent: 4124503 (1978-11-01), Watson
patent: 4129498 (1978-12-01), Clark et al.
patent: 4172819 (1979-10-01), Mitchell et al.
patent: 4190524 (1980-02-01), Watson
patent: 4272365 (1981-06-01), Ries et al.
patent: 4298478 (1981-11-01), Watson et al.
patent: 4609109 (1986-09-01), Good
patent: 4668383 (1987-05-01), Watson
patent: 4694269 (1987-09-01), Burnett et al.
patent: 4702825 (1987-10-01), Selvaggi et al.
patent: 4707676 (1987-11-01), Saitou et al.
patent: 4726199 (1988-02-01), Takano et al.
patent: 4743880 (1988-05-01), Breneman et al.
patent: 4755302 (1988-07-01), Unkelbach et al.
patent: 4768008 (1988-08-01), Purcell et al.
patent: 4784760 (1988-11-01), Good et al.
patent: 4819450 (1989-04-01), Miller
patent: 4822772 (1989-04-01), Huson
patent: 5004539 (1991-04-01), Colwell, Jr.
patent: 5019247 (1991-05-01), Purcell et al.
patent: 5148137 (1992-09-01), Purcell et al.
patent: 5237738 (1993-08-01), Purcell et al.
Andrews L. Cullen
Beck Gregory S.
Burnett Sibley C.
Creedon R. Lewis
Purcell John R.
Nguyen Tuan N.
Outokumpu Oyj
LandOfFree
Magnetic separator having an improved separation container confi does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Magnetic separator having an improved separation container confi, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Magnetic separator having an improved separation container confi will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2199519