Machine learning systems and methods

Data processing: artificial intelligence – Neural network – Learning task

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07389277

ABSTRACT:
A method for using machine learning to solve problems having either a “positive” result (the event occurred) or a “negative” result (the event did not occur), in which the probability of a positive result is very low and the consequences of the positive result are significant. Training data is obtained and a subset of that data is distilled for application to a machine learning system. The training data includes some records corresponding to the positive result, some nearest neighbors from the records corresponding to the negative result, and some other records corresponding to the negative result. The machine learning system uses a co-evolution approach to obtain a rule set for predicting results after a number of cycles. The machine system uses a fitness function derived for use with the type of problem, such as a fitness function based on the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the rules. The rules are validated using the entire set of training data.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4754410 (1988-06-01), Leech et al.
patent: 5535301 (1996-07-01), Wolpert
patent: 5769074 (1998-06-01), Barnhill et al.
patent: 5799101 (1998-08-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5832467 (1998-11-01), Wavish
patent: 5853005 (1998-12-01), Scanlon
patent: 5855011 (1998-12-01), Tatsuoka
patent: 5862304 (1999-01-01), Ravdin et al.
patent: 6088606 (2000-07-01), Ignotz et al.
patent: 6149636 (2000-11-01), Roe et al.
patent: 6230151 (2001-05-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 6248063 (2001-06-01), Barnhill et al.
patent: 6260033 (2001-07-01), Tatsuoka
patent: 6301571 (2001-10-01), Tatsuoka
patent: 6306087 (2001-10-01), Barnhill et al.
patent: 6342037 (2002-01-01), Roe et al.
patent: 6353814 (2002-03-01), Weng
patent: 6372951 (2002-04-01), Ter-Ovanesyan et al.
patent: 6399853 (2002-06-01), Roe et al.
patent: 6407308 (2002-06-01), Roe et al.
patent: 6409684 (2002-06-01), Wilk
patent: 6433244 (2002-08-01), Roe et al.
patent: 6436055 (2002-08-01), Roe
patent: 6479727 (2002-11-01), Roe
patent: 6519580 (2003-02-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 6523017 (2003-02-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 6570053 (2003-05-01), Roe et al.
patent: 6668248 (2003-12-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 6713660 (2004-03-01), Roe et al.
patent: 6728689 (2004-04-01), Drissi et al.
patent: 6732083 (2004-05-01), Bax
patent: 6754655 (2004-06-01), Segal
patent: 6917926 (2005-07-01), Chen et al.
patent: 6968327 (2005-11-01), Kates et al.
patent: 7001359 (2006-02-01), Rogers
patent: 2002/0184169 (2002-12-01), Optiz
patent: 2002/0194148 (2002-12-01), Billet et al.
patent: WO 97/44741 (1997-11-01), None
Driver's drowsiness estimation by combining EEG signal analysis and ICA-based fuzzy neural networks Chin-Teng Lin; Sheng-Fu Liang; Yu-Chieh Chen; Yung-Chi Hsu; Li-Wei Ko; Circuits and Systems, 2006. ISCAS 2006. Proceedings. 2006 IEEE International Symposium on May 21-24, 2006 p. 4 pp. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ISCAS.2006.1693037.
A fuzzy classifier approach to assessing the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from radiographic indicators Ajemba, P.O.; Ramirez, L.; Durdle, N.G.; Hill, D.L.; Raso, V.J.; Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2004. Canadian Conference on vol. 3, May 2-5, 2004 pp. 1467-1470 vol. 3.
A medical service requirements model for health system design Smallwood, R.D.; Murray, G.R.; Silva, D.D.; Sondik, E.J.; Klainer, L.M.; Proceedings of the IEEE vol. 57, Issue 11, Nov. 1969 pp. 1880-1887.
Nakashima et al., “GA-Based Approaches for Finding the Minimum Reference Set for Nearest Neighbor Classification,” 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, May 1998.
Chen, “A Notion for Machine Learning: Knowledge Developability,” Proceedings of the 21stAnnual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 274-279, Jan. 1988.
Kovalerchuk et al., “Comparison of Relational Methods and Attribute-Based Methods for Data Mining in Intelligent Systems,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control/Intelligent Systems and Semiotics, Sep. 1999.
Guan et al., “Protein Structure Prediction Using Hybrid Al Methods,” Proceedings of the 10thConference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, Mar. 1994, pp. 471-473.
Michel et al., “Tree-Structured Nonlinear Signal Modeling and Prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Nov. 1999, vol. 47, No. 11.
Gregor et al., “Hybrid Pattern Recognition Using Markov Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Jun. 1993, vol. 15, No. 6.
Salzberg et al., “Best-Case Results for Nearest-Neighbor Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Jun. 1995, vol. 17, No. 6.
Guvenir et al., “A Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm for Arrhythmia Analysis,” Computers in Cardiology, Sep. 1997, pp. 433-436.
Ratsaby, “Incremental Learning with Sample Queries,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Aug. 1998, vol. 20, No. 8.
Ricci et al., “Data Compression and Local Metrics for Nearest Neighbor Classification,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Apr. 1999, vol. 21, No. 4.
Lee, “An Information Theoretic Similarity-Based Learning Method for Databases”, Proceedings of the 10thConference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, Mar. 1994, pp. 99-105.
Cercone, N., et al., “Rule-Induction and Case-Based Reasoning: Hybrid Architectures Appear Advantageous”IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 11(1) pp. 166-174 (1999).
Harris, et al., “Class X: A Browsing Tool For Protein Sequence Megaclassifications”Proceedings of the 26thHawaii International Conference on System Science, vol. 1, pp. 554-563 (1993).
Hunter, et al., “Applying Bayesian Classification to Protein Structure”IEEE Expert, vol. 7(4), pp. 67-75 (1991).
Hunter, “Knowledge Acquisition Planning for Interference From Large Databases”Proceedings of the 23rdAnnual Hawaii International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, vol. 2, pp. 35-44 (1990).
Hunter, et al., “Bayesian Classification of Protein Structural Elements”Proceedings of the 24thAnnual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 595-604 (1991).
Hunter, et al., Bayesian Classification of Protein StructureIEEE Report, vol. 7(4), pp. 67-75 (1992).
Junkar, et al., “Grinding Process Control Through Monitoring and Machine Learning”3rdInternational Conference on Factory 2000, Competitive Performance Through Advanced Technology, pp. 77-80 (1992).
Linkens, et al., “Machine-Learning Rule-based Fuzzy Logic Control for Depth of Anaesthesia”1994 International Conference on Control, vol. 1, pp. 31-36 (1994).
Hunter, “Coevolution Learning: Synergistic Evolution of Learning Agents and Problems Representations”Proceedings of 1996 Multistrategy Learning Conference, pp. 85-94 (1996).
Abramson, M.Z., et al., “Classification Using Cultural Co-evolution and Genetic Programming”Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, pp. 249-254 (1996).
Robnik-Sikonja, M., et al., “An Adaptation of Relief for Attribute Estimation in Regression”Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference, pp. 296-304 (1997).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Machine learning systems and methods does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Machine learning systems and methods, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Machine learning systems and methods will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2805920

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.