Low temperature heat transfer methods

Details Low temperature heat transfer methods Low temperature heat transfer methods

2001-10-31

2003-06-10

Capossela, Ronald (Department: 3744)

Refrigeration

Processes

Circulating external gas

C062S051100, C062S434000, C062S616000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06574972

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to novel low temperature heat transfer methods in a variety of applications.
2. Related Art
Pure or relatively pure helium has excellent heat transfer properties. For example, helium is typically employed to enhance fiber cooling during the optical fiber drawing process because it is chemically inert and because of its heat transfer properties. Of the common pure gases, only hydrogen has a higher thermal conductivity than pure helium. However, hydrogen is not as inert as helium and it is more hazardous to employ in certain heat transfer applications than any inert gas. So, hydrogen is typically avoided as a gaseous heat transfer medium in some (but not all) cooling or heating process applications. Substantially pure argon, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide are also typically avoided as gaseous cooling agents because their heat transfer properties are not as good as either hydrogen or helium, but they are safer to use than hydrogen and much cheaper than helium.
Typical impurities in the helium used in heat transfer processes are due to minor impurities initially present within the source of “pure” helium as well as contamination by infiltration of other species into the helium that is used to transfer heat between the helium and the item or material being cooled or heated. These impurities often consist primarily of nitrogen and oxygen with much smaller concentrations of argon, carbon dioxide, and water vapor as well as even smaller concentrations of other gaseous constituents normally found in air. These impurities are generally tolerated because they are difficult and/or costly to avoid.
It is generally accepted that binary mixtures of helium (or hydrogen) with other gases will have better heat transfer coefficients than the pure gases themselves. See, for example, M. R. Vanco, “Analytical Comparison of Relative Heat-Transfer Coefficients and Pressure Drops of Inert Gases and Their Binary Mixtures, NASA TN D2677 (1965); F. W. Giacobbe, “Heat Transfer Capability of Selected Binary Gaseous Mixtures Relative to Helium and Hydrogen”,
Applied Thermal Engineering
Vol. 18, Nos. 3-4, pp.199-206 (1998); R. Holoboffet al., “Gas Quenching With Helium”,
Advanced Materials & Processes,
Vol. 143, No. 2, pp.23-26 (1993). In particular, Holoboff et al. noted that in the context of a heat treating furnace, by changing to an optimum helium/argon mixture, a customer was able to heat treat parts that could not be processed as rapidly when using argon alone, while maintaining costs at a fraction of that for using 100% helium. In a separate example the same authors also recognized the benefits of increasing the fan speed (gas circulation velocity) on cooling rate for pure helium and for pure nitrogen. However, there is no teaching or suggestion of the influence of heat transfer fluid mixture velocity on cooling rate for optimized mixtures of heat transfer fluid.
For illustrative purposes, and according to earlier theories, the relative heat transfer capability of helium plus one other noble gas compared to pure helium may be seen in FIG.
1
. In
FIG. 1
, pure helium has been arbitrarily assigned a relative heat transfer capability of 1.0 in order to deliberately avoid the use of a more complicated system of SI heat transfer units. Therefore, if a binary gas mixture containing helium has a heat transfer capability of 2.0 (relative to pure helium), it is assumed from this data that the gas mixture will be 2.0 times more effective in any heat transfer process employing that gaseous mixture instead of pure helium alone. And, as a simplified illustration of the potential helium savings using this data, if the best binary gas mixture contained only 50 percent (by volume or mole fraction) helium plus 50 percent of some other gas, only ½ of that gas mixture would be needed to perform the same cooling function as the pure helium alone. Therefore, only 25 percent of the helium that would have been required for a particular heat exchange process using pure helium would be needed during the same cooling process employing the gas mixture.
In
FIG. 2
, and also according to earlier theories, the optimum composition and approximate relative heat transfer capability of hydrogen plus one noble gas with respect to pure helium is illustrated. In
FIG. 2
, pure helium has also been arbitrarily assigned a relative heat transfer capability of 1.0. So, if a binary gas mixture containing only hydrogen and argon (but no helium) has a heat transfer capability of 1.4 (relative to pure helium), that gas mixture presumably will be 1.4 times more effective in any heat transfer process employing that gaseous mixture instead of pure helium alone. And, since no helium is required to produce this effect, the helium usage is cut to zero. Furthermore, since hydrogen and argon are typically much less expensive than helium, the overall cost of the hydrogen/argon coolant gas stream will tend to be negligible compared to a pure (or relatively pure) helium coolant gas steam.
It should be emphasized that the data presented in
FIGS. 1 and 2
are theoretical and based on turbulent flow for all the gases and gas mixtures considered. However, in the seminal work of R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart, and E. N. Lightfoot,
Transport Phenomena,
pp. 392-393 (1960) it was pointed out that “the heat-transfer coefficient depends in a complicated way on many variables, including the fluid properties (k, &mgr;, &rgr;, C
p
), the system geometry, the flow velocity, the value of the characteristic temperature difference, and the surface temperature distribution.” In engineering design, therefore, use of constant property idealization frequently leads to either a greater built in safety factor, or a dangerous situation if the other extreme is taken. See D. M. McEligot, et al., “Internal Forced Convection to Mixtures of Inert Gases”,
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,
Vol. 20, pp. 475-486 (1977).
Everyone agrees that helium is an expensive fluid. While it is inert, it is a non-renewable resource. Once it escapes to the atmosphere it is not recoverable. Helium is commonly recycled, sometimes after purification, such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,897,682 and 6,092,391. However this requires expensive compression and/or cryogenic equipment. Indeed, as noted by K. Bammert et al., “The Influence of He—Ne, He—N
2
, and He—CO
2
Gas Mixtures on Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines”, ASME paper 74-GT-124 (1974), while pure helium is often considered the best gaseous fluid in terms of heat transfer efficiency (except for pure hydrogen) and therefore heat exchange units may be particularly compact, the size of compression equipment required to compress the gas is prohibitive in many applications, such as space travel. Thus, the expense of the heat transfer fluid (helium) is combined with a relatively large expense for compression equipment, even though heat transfer equipment may be smaller.
In light of the unexpected nature of heat transfer coefficients of gases and gas mixtures, it would be advantageous in many heat transfer situations common in engineering to employ a substantially pure heat transfer fluid, even though the substantially pure fluid heat transfer coefficient is less than the heat transfer coefficient of a mixture of that fluid with another heat transfer fluid under certain conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, a first aspect of the invention is a method of cooling an object, the method comprising: a) contacting a heat transfer fluid with a liquid cryogen to form a precooled heat transfer fluid; and b) contacting the object with the precooled heat transfer fluid to form a cooled object and a recycle flow of said heat transfer fluid, the precooled heat transfer fluid consisting essentially of a compound selected from the group consisting of substantially pure hydrogen, substantially pure helium, substantially pure argon, substantially pure nitrogen, and substantially pure carbon dioxide, and wherein the contacting the object is selected from the

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Low temperature heat transfer methods does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Low temperature heat transfer methods, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Low temperature heat transfer methods will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3155526