Low offset and low glitch energy charge pump for PLL-based...

Oscillators – Automatic frequency stabilization using a phase or frequency... – Transistorized controls

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C331S017000, C327S157000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06181210

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to high speed data transmission and conversion systems and, more particularly, to a system for and a method of controlling the average current output of a charge pump such that glitch energy and offset voltage errors are minimized.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The past several years have witnessed a dramatic increase in the capabilities of high-speed, high-density, broadband data communication systems. Pertinent such systems range anywhere from broadcast or cablecast HDTV systems, local area and wide area (LAN, WAN) systems for multimedia, fibre to the home (FTTH) applications and board-to-board interconnections in exchange systems and computers.
In any one of the foregoing applications, it should be noted that bidirectional data communication is in digital form and, accordingly, clock and data recovery circuitry is a key component of the efficient functioning of modern data communications systems. The ability to regenerate binary data is an inherent advantage of transmitting information digitally as opposed to transmitting such information in analog form. However, in order for the intelligence signal to be correctly reconstructed at the receiving end, the transmitted binary data must be regenerated with the fewest possible number of bit errors, requiring received data to be sampled at an optimum sample rate and at an optimum instance of time. Given the bandwidth constraints imposed on most modern data communication systems, it is generally impractical to transmit the requisite sampling clock signal separate from the transmitted datastream. Timing information is consequently derived from the incoming transmitted data signal itself. Extraction of the implicit timing signal is generally termed timing recovery (or clock recovery) in it's functional role in general digital receiver technology, is traditionally performed by a phase-lock-loop system such as that illustrated in FIG.
1
.
Phase-lock-loops operate to compare the frequency and/or phase of an incoming serial datastream to a periodic reference clock signal generated by an oscillator circuit, and to adjust the operational frequency and phase characteristics of the oscillator until its output stream is “locked” in both frequency and phase to the data signal. A reference clock is thereby established which, in turn, controls operation of a decision circuit which regenerates (or retimes) the data signal. The phase-lock-loop suitably comprises a phase detector
10
whose output is coupled to a charge pump circuit
12
, operatively connected, in turn, to a loop filter
13
and a voltage controlled oscillator (or VCO)
14
.
The data signal is received at a data input of the phase detector
10
, in which the occurrence of the data's rising edge (its phase) is compared in time to the occurrence of a rising edge (the phase) of an output signal of the VCO
14
. Conventionally, the phase detector incorporates logic circuity (in effect a logical XNOR function) which precludes an output signal from being issued during phase comparisons unless two rising edges are present during a comparison cycle. This feature prevents the phase-lock-loop from becoming unstable by trying to perform a phase comparison between a VCO rising edge and a DATA ZERO bit (necessarily without a rising edge). It will be understood that the phase comparison result in such a situation would indicate either an infinite phase lead or an infinite phase lag, thus causing the VCO frequency to run out of control.
According to convention, the phase detector
10
issues a PUMP UP signal
16
to the charge pump
12
if the datastream phase leads the VCO signal, and issues a PUMP DN
18
if the datastream phase lags the VCO signal. PUMP UP and PUMP DN are directed to the charge pump
12
which sources or sinks a particular amount of current (the pump current) to or from, respectively, the loop filter
13
. Voltage is developed as the pump current is sourced or sunk, with the voltage being used to control the operational frequency of the VCO
14
. The sign of the VCO control voltage variation depends on whether the phase of the datastream leads or lags the phase of the VCO output and its magnitude is a function of the extent of the phase lead or phase lag. Thus, the operational frequency of the VCO
14
is increased or decreased, as appropriate, to reduce the phase lead or phase lag of the inputs to the phase detector
10
. The phase-lock-loop thus ensures that the VCO output, which is used as a timing reference, is locked in phase with the incoming serial datastream. Once the PLL is “locked”, the timing reference signal (i.e., the VCO output) is used to control operation of a decision circuit
19
which defines regenerated or retimed data.
A particular shortcoming of prior art phase-lock-loop systems is that the charge pump is required to source and sink current which precisely represents the magnitude and polarity of a phase difference between incoming data and the VCO. In addition, for a type II or a type IV phase detector operating in quasi flywheel mode, the charge pump is required to source and sink current in such a manner that the output current, averaged over a correction cycle, equals 0. In other words, the charge pump should ideally only cause corrections to be made to the operating characteristics of the VCO which result from consistent frequency shifts of the datastream, such that the VCO is locked to the mean phase of the incoming datastream rather than to the phase of any specific data bit.
Maintaining perfect phase-lock VCO to data, however, is particularly difficult for conventional prior art-type phase-lock-loop circuits operating in the GHz range, because of the internal construction of conventional prior art-type charge pump circuits. In addition, the source and sink current waveforms, of such conventional charge pump circuits, exhibit significant amounts of offset and “glitch errors” which cause the source and sink current waveforms to be non-symmetrical. This non-symmetry necessarily results in a residual charge being left on the filter capacitor at the end of a correction cycle and further causes a non-zero increment to the control voltage V
c
to the VCO. The terms “offset” and “glitch errors” refer to fluctuations in the source and/or sink current waveforms and represent quantifiable departures from a smooth waveform characteristic. These fluctuations are caused by a variety of factors, the majority of which are functions of the physical and electrical properties of semiconductor integrated circuit transistors and integrated circuit charge pumps manufactured therefrom and exhibit the response characteristics illustrated in FIG.
2
.
Offset is an undesirable quantum of charge output from a charge pump when the PUMP UP and PUMP DN signals applied to the input of the charge pump are identical (i.e., the output of the charge pump should be flat or zero). This DC offset current tends to perturb the system in one direction or the other and results in timing jitter at the output of the VCO. Glitch energy is a sharp transition peak signal defined at the output of the charge pump, caused in major part by transition edge (clock) feed through effects of the input signals.
To better understand the causes of offset and glitch errors, it will be helpful to review the common and well-known charge pump architecture depicted in simplified form in FIG.
3
.
Conceptually, a charge pump may be viewed as a “pump up” current source
20
connected in series with a switch
22
to provide an output source current in response to a PUMP UP signal issued by a, for example, phase detector. Similarly, a “pump down” current sink
24
is coupled between a V
SS
supply and a second switch
26
which, together function to define a sink current in response to a PUMP DN signal from the phase detector. While relatively simple, the simplified charge pump design of
FIG. 3
can be used to illustrate several practical problems with contemporary charge pump design. For example, DC mismatches in the up and down current sources

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Low offset and low glitch energy charge pump for PLL-based... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Low offset and low glitch energy charge pump for PLL-based..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Low offset and low glitch energy charge pump for PLL-based... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2477275

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.