Bleaching and dyeing; fluid treatment and chemical modification – Dry dye composition other than mere mixture of two or more...
Patent
1992-11-10
1994-11-22
Lieberman, Paul
Bleaching and dyeing; fluid treatment and chemical modification
Dry dye composition other than mere mixture of two or more...
8526, 8611, C09B 6742
Patent
active
053665120
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
The invention relates to the field of dye preparations.
Pulverulent dye preparations are widely produced and used in industry, for example for preparing padding and dyeing liquors for dyeing textile materials and for preparing print pastes for printing paper and textiles. Pulverulent dye preparations are prone to dusting not only in the course of being produced but also in use. This can lead to dye losses, the contamination of places of work and materials being worked, and health hazards for the people concerned with handling such dusting preparations.
There have been various suggestions for solving this problem.
For instance, liquid preparations and granules have been developed. Liquid preparations are naturally free of dusting, but they have other disadvantages, such as limited shelf lives and low dye contents, which necessitates increased packaging, storage and transportation costs. In addition, liquid preparations can be prepared only from sufficiently soluble dyes. Granules require special production technologies and can be produced only with additional and costly apparatus. Moreover, most granular products are likewise not dust-free from the start or form dust in the course of being packaged or transferred or during transportation. Like powders they must therefore be treated with dustproofing agents, albeit with smaller amounts thereof.
On the other hand, there have been many attempts to convert pulverulent dyes into a low-dust or dust-free form with dustproofing agents. Examples of substances used for this purpose include phthalic esters, silicones, dodecylbenzene, surfactants and mineral oil alone or combined with nonionic, anionic or cationic surfactants (see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,604,469 and 3,560,134, German Patent 834,237, German Offenlegungsschrift 2,523,096, German Auslegeschrift 1,117,582 and European Patent Application Publication 0 023 638A).
However, the use of any of these dustproofing agents or dust removal methods is associated with considerable risks and disadvantages. Mineral oils and other water-insoluble dustproofing agents generally have an adverse effect on the cold water solubility important for energy-saving low-temperature dyeing methods. They are also responsible for the formation of oily deposits in the dyeing liquors, which may cause spotty, unlevel dyeings. This is one of the reasons for adding surfactants, another reason being that they are intended to ensure the uniform dispersion of the water-insoluble dustproofing agents if the latter are added to the dye solutions, dispersions or suspensions even before drying, for example spray drying. Apart from the fact that surfactants give rise to unwanted foam--unwanted because it disrupts the smooth running of the dyeing process--nonionic surfactants alone or combined with a mineral oil may likewise give rise to oily deposits in the dyeing liquors in particular under the conditions customary when dyeing with reactive dyes, namely the presence of electrolytes (such as sodium chloride or sodium sulfate) and alkali (such as sodium carbonate or sodium hydroxide), either because under these dyeing conditions the mineral oil-surfactant emulsions break or the cloud point of the nonionic surfactants is lowered to the dyeing temperature or below.
Ever since it was realized that dusting dyes can also represent a health hazard to the people handling them, significantly higher standards are expected of the dustproofness of a dye. For instance, the dust values whereby "dust-free" and "low-dust" dye preparations are delimited from dusting dye preparations in the above-mentioned German Auslegeschrift and European patent application publication fall a long way short of present-day expectations. Moreover, a dye powder having a dust value of below 10 cannot in general be considered dust-free. For instance, a dye powder having a dust number of less than 5 is entirely capable of evolving sufficient fine dust as to make it impossible to rule out a possible health hazard to the people who come into contact therewith. For this reason a method
REFERENCES:
patent: 2604469 (1952-07-01), Herrmann
patent: 3560134 (1971-02-01), Streck
patent: 3583877 (1971-06-01), Rosenblum et al.
patent: 4069013 (1978-01-01), Hett et al.
patent: 4295851 (1981-10-01), Neumann et al.
patent: 4397652 (1983-08-01), Neumann
Mischke Peter
Opitz Konrad
Rebsamen Karl
Einsmann Margaret
Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
Lieberman Paul
LandOfFree
Low-dust or dust-free dye preparations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Low-dust or dust-free dye preparations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Low-dust or dust-free dye preparations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1988347