Locating potentially identical objects across multiple...

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Distributed data processing – Client/server

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C709S201000, C709S219000, C715S739000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10991571

ABSTRACT:
Potentially identical objects (e.g., files) are located across multiple computers based on stochastic partitioning of workload. For each of a plurality of objects stored on a plurality of computers in a network, a portion of object information corresponding to the object is selected. The object information can be generated in a variety of manners (e.g., based on hashing the object, based on characteristics of the object, and so forth). Any of a variety of portions of the object information can be used (e.g., the least significant bits of the object information). A stochastic partitioning process is then used to identify which of the plurality of computers to communicate the object information to for identification of potentially identical objects on the plurality of computers.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5202982 (1993-04-01), Gramlich et al.
patent: 5317728 (1994-05-01), Tevis et al.
patent: 5371794 (1994-12-01), Diffie et al.
patent: 5452447 (1995-09-01), Nelson et al.
patent: 5588147 (1996-12-01), Neeman et al.
patent: 5680611 (1997-10-01), Rail et al.
patent: 5758359 (1998-05-01), Saxon
patent: 5778395 (1998-07-01), Whiting et al.
patent: 5794042 (1998-08-01), Terada et al.
patent: 5812776 (1998-09-01), Gifford
patent: 5873085 (1999-02-01), Enoki et al.
patent: 5901227 (1999-05-01), Perlman
patent: 5907673 (1999-05-01), Hirayama et al.
patent: 5909540 (1999-06-01), Carter et al.
patent: 5913217 (1999-06-01), Alger et al.
patent: 5915096 (1999-06-01), Rosenzweig et al.
patent: 5950198 (1999-09-01), Falls et al.
patent: 5978805 (1999-11-01), Carson
patent: 5991414 (1999-11-01), Garay et al.
patent: 5991771 (1999-11-01), Falls et al.
patent: 6026474 (2000-02-01), Carter et al.
patent: 6029168 (2000-02-01), Frey
patent: 6067545 (2000-05-01), Wolff
patent: 6098079 (2000-08-01), Howard
patent: 6160552 (2000-12-01), Wilsher et al.
patent: 6167449 (2000-12-01), Arnold et al.
patent: 6185574 (2001-02-01), Howard et al.
patent: 6208659 (2001-03-01), Govindarajan et al.
patent: 6233606 (2001-05-01), Dujari
patent: 6263348 (2001-07-01), Kathrow et al.
patent: 6269080 (2001-07-01), Kumar
patent: 6295538 (2001-09-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 6324544 (2001-11-01), Alam et al.
patent: 6345288 (2002-02-01), Reed et al.
patent: 6370547 (2002-04-01), Eftink
patent: 6389433 (2002-05-01), Bolosky et al.
patent: 6405315 (2002-06-01), Burns et al.
patent: 6415372 (2002-07-01), Zakai et al.
patent: 6463535 (2002-10-01), Drews
patent: 6466978 (2002-10-01), Mukherjee et al.
patent: 6477544 (2002-11-01), Bolosky et al.
patent: 6484186 (2002-11-01), Rungta
patent: 6484204 (2002-11-01), Rabinovich
patent: 6493804 (2002-12-01), Soltis et al.
patent: 6510426 (2003-01-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 6516350 (2003-02-01), Lumelsky et al.
patent: 6522423 (2003-02-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 6535894 (2003-03-01), Schmidt et al.
patent: 6556998 (2003-04-01), Mukherjee et al.
patent: 6560706 (2003-05-01), Carbajal et al.
patent: 6577734 (2003-06-01), Etzel et al.
patent: 6671821 (2003-12-01), Castro et al.
patent: 6704730 (2004-03-01), Moulton et al.
patent: 6718360 (2004-04-01), Jones et al.
patent: 6721880 (2004-04-01), Pike
patent: 6725373 (2004-04-01), Carbajal et al.
patent: 6738797 (2004-05-01), Martin
patent: 6742114 (2004-05-01), Carter et al.
patent: 6748538 (2004-06-01), Chan et al.
patent: 6766367 (2004-07-01), Stevenson et al.
patent: 6788769 (2004-09-01), Waites
patent: 6928426 (2005-08-01), Dake
patent: 6952737 (2005-10-01), Coates et al.
patent: 6990578 (2006-01-01), O'Brien et al.
patent: 7000141 (2006-02-01), Karlsson et al.
patent: 7051028 (2006-05-01), Shi et al.
patent: 2001/0039548 (2001-11-01), Shinkai et al.
patent: 2002/0016174 (2002-02-01), Gibson et al.
patent: 2002/0073082 (2002-06-01), Duvillier et al.
patent: 2002/0088011 (2002-07-01), Lamkin et al.
patent: 2002/0095590 (2002-07-01), Douceur et al.
patent: 2002/0099784 (2002-07-01), Tran
patent: 2002/0103818 (2002-08-01), Amberden
patent: 2002/0111996 (2002-08-01), Jones et al.
patent: 2003/0046533 (2003-03-01), Olkin et al.
patent: 2003/0135586 (2003-07-01), Minborg et al.
patent: 2004/0068652 (2004-04-01), Carpentier et al.
patent: 0663640 (1995-07-01), None
ISU://www.isu.edu/departments/comcom/unix/workshop/shell.html, “Section 4: The UNIX Shell”, 3 pages, no date.
From the Internet://www.isu.edu/departments/comcom/unix.workshop/, retrieved Sep. 28, 2005.
Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 186: Digital Signature Standard (DSS). 1994, no date.
Borg, Digital Signatures Keep Cyberstreets Safe for Shoppers, Computer Technology Review, vol. 16, No. 2, Feb. 1996 p. 1.
Hu, Some Thoughts on Agent Trust and Delegation, Available at http://www.cs.nccu.edu.tw/jong, 2001, pp. 489-496.
E. Adar and B. Huberman, “Free Riding on Gnutella,” Xerox PARC Technical Report, pp. 1-22, Aug. 2000.
R. Anderson, “The Eternity Service,” PRAGO-CRYPT, pp. 242-252, Oct. 1996.
T. Anderson, M. Dahlin, J. Neefe, D. Patterson, D. Roselli, and R. Wang, “Severless Network File Systems,” 15th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 109-126, Dec. 1995.
W. Bolosky, J. Douceur, D. Ely, M. Theimer, “Feasibility of a Serverless Distributed File System Deployed on an Existing Set of Desktop PCs”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pp. 34-43, Jun. 17-21, 2000.
W. Bolosky, S. Corbin, D. Goebel, and J. Douceur, “Single Instance Storage in Windows® 2000,” Proceedings of the 4th USENIX Windows Systems Symposium, pp. 13-24, Aug. 2000.
G. Cabri, A. Corradi, F. Zambonelli, “Experience of Adaptive Replication in Distributed File Systems”, 22nd IEEE EUROMICRO, 10 pages, Sep. 1996.
M. Castro and B. Liskov, “Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance,” Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 14 pages, Feb. 1999.
M. Castro and B. Liskov, “Proactive Recovery in a Byzantine-Fault-Tolerant System,” 4th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 273-287, Oct. 2000.
I. Clarke, O. Sandberg, B. Wiley, and T. Hong, “Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System,” ICSI Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, 21 pages, Jul. 2000.
J. Douceur and W. Bolosky, “A Large-Scale Study of File-System Contents,” SIGMETRICS, pp. 59-70, May 1999.
L. Fan, P. Cao, J. Almeida, and A. Broder, “Summary Cache: A Scalable Wide-Area Web Cache Sharing Protocol”, ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 254-265, 1998.
A. Goldberg and P. Yianilos, “Towards and Archival Intermemory,” IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries, pp. 147-156, Apr. 1998.
J. Howard, M. Kazar, S. Menees, D. Nichols, M. Satyanarayanan, R. Sidebotham, and M. West, “Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, pp. 51-81, Feb. 1988.
J. Kistler and M. Satyanarayanan, “Disconnected Operation in the Coda File System,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 3-25, Feb. 1992.
J. Kubiatowicz et al., “OceanStore: An Architecture for Global-Scale Persistent Storage,” Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Architectural Support for Porgramming Languages and Operating Systems, 12 pages, Nov. 2000.
E. Lee and C. Thekkath, “Petal: Distributed Virtual Disks,” Seventh International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pp. 84-92, Oct. 1996.
D. Mazières, M. Kaminsky, M. F. Kaashoek, and E. Witchel, “Seperating Key Management from File System Security”, 17th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 124-139, Dec. 1999.
D.L. McCue, M.C. Little, “Computing Replica Placement in Distributed Systems”, IEEE Second Workshop on Replicated Data, pp. 58-61, Nov. 1992.
M. K. McKusick, W. N. Joy, S. J. Leffler, and R. S. Fabry, “A Fast File System for Unix,” ACM Transactions

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Locating potentially identical objects across multiple... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Locating potentially identical objects across multiple..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Locating potentially identical objects across multiple... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3727699

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.