Land vehicles: bodies and tops – Bodies – Enclosed compartment
Reexamination Certificate
2001-09-12
2002-10-08
Pedder, Dennis H. (Department: 3612)
Land vehicles: bodies and tops
Bodies
Enclosed compartment
C410S118000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06460912
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to vehicular barrier devices, and, more particularly, to such a barrier device which is relatively lightweight, while advantageously preventing the inadvertent passage of cargo from the trunk to the passenger compartment.
Manufacturers of passenger and cargo vehicles, such as automobiles (including SUVs and the like), trucks, trains, aircraft, marine craft, and the like, continuously strive to make the vehicles more fuel efficient while at the same time improving the safety for passengers and/or operators of the vehicles. One way in which fuel may be conserved is to make the vehicle weigh less. As such, particularly in automobiles, alternative materials such as polymeric materials have replaced metal in many areas of the vehicle.
Many years ago, manufacturers generally eliminated the heavy, metal bulkhead between the trunk and passenger compartments which had often been found in conventional sedan-type automobiles. Further, due to the desirability of having a means for transporting oversized cargo, manufacturers began to design and sell fold-down seats to accommodate pass-through cargo from the trunk to the passenger compartments. However, safety requirements relating to the restraint of cargo within the trunk under certain conditions sometimes necessitated finding a replacement for the metal bulkhead. Further, it was unfortunately discovered that the latching mechanisms for fold-down seats sometimes were not strong enough to withstand forces experienced under some frontal crash conditions. Tragically, due to passengers being restrained from bending over due to the 3 point passenger passive restraint systems, such latching mechanism failures could possibly result in injury to passengers.
Although many lighter materials exist, these materials generally do not pass safety requirements since they often fail in restraining cargo in the trunk from inadvertently entering the passenger compartment. The suitable replacement materials which do exist are either cost prohibitive, or for strength they must be much wider than standard sheet metal used - - - as such, they therefore cannot fit within the space constraints of the automobile.
One such replacement is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,231 issued in 1991. The automotive barrier net disclosed therein was a suitable metal bulkhead replacement; and in certain situations, may yet be a suitable replacement therefor. However, since the invention of that barrier net, more stringent safety standards have been proposed relating to the restraint of cargo within the trunk area.
An example of such a requirement is found in the United Nations “Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of these Prescriptions,” Addendum 16: Regulation No. 17, Revision 3, Amendment 3, Nov. 4, 1998 (as printed April 1999), which publication is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Regulation No. 17 is entitled “Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to the Seats, their Anchorages and Head Restraints.”
Annex 9 of Regulation No. 17 defines the test procedure for devices intended to protect the occupants against displacement of luggage. Paragraph 2 of Annex 9 of Reg. No. 17 specifies that two blocks each having a mass of 18 kg are to be placed in the trunk area. Paragraph 2 of Annex 7 of Reg. No. 17 defines the conditions for the standardized vehicular crash test; and specifies that the speed on impact shall be between 48.3 km/h and 53.1 km/h. Paragraph 6.3.1 of Reg. No. 17 states that a longitudinal horizontal deceleration of not less than 20 (1 g being approximately equal to 9.8 m/s
2
) shall be applied for 30 milliseconds in the forward direction to the whole shell of the vehicle in accordance with the requirements of Annex 7. Upon completion of such testing, the 18 kg blocks should not enter the passenger area.
This rather stringent requirement generally is not met with many current automobiles. One alternative for meeting this requirement would be to reinforce the rearmost passenger seats with sheet metal. However, major drawbacks exist with this alternative, a few of which are that the sheet metal would add at least about 25 pounds to the weight of the automobile; it would be difficult and time consuming to design and test seat latch mechanisms which could withstand high enough loads under certain crash conditions; and retooling expenses would be very high.
Thus, it is an object of the present invention to provide a load restraining barrier device which would advantageously pass applicable safety requirements. It is a further object of the present invention to provide such a device which may be incorporated into current automotive designs with minimal changes thereto, either as an OEM part or as an after-market part. Yet further, it is an object of the present invention to provide such a device which is lightweight and relatively inexpensive to manufacture. Still further, it is an object of the present invention to provide such a device which may be detached to advantageously provide pass-through cargo storage if desired. It is yet another object of the present invention to provide such a device which may incorporate convenience netting therewith to provide secure and/or long-term cargo storage.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention addresses and solves the above-mentioned problems and meets the enumerated objects and advantages, as well as others not enumerated, by providing a load restraining barrier device for use in a motor vehicle, the vehicle having a body with a passenger compartment and a trunk compartment, the trunk compartment having a forward end with a top wall comprising a package tray, a bottom wall, and two opposed side walls extending substantially upwardly from the bottom wall. The barrier device comprises a barrier body having a predetermined geometric shape and disposed at the trunk forward end and suspended between the passenger compartment and the trunk compartment, the barrier body having a front, a back, a top, a bottom, and two opposed sides, the front adapted to face the trunk compartment, the back adapted to face the passenger compartment, the top adapted to be adjacent the package tray, the bottom adapted to be adjacent the bottom wall, and the two opposed sides adapted to be adjacent the two opposed side walls. A substantially horizontal reinforcing member extends between the two opposed sides and is located substantially at or below a midpoint between the top and the bottom. Means are provided for attaching the top to the package tray, and means are also provided for releasably attaching the bottom to at least one of the bottom wall and the opposed side walls.
When the barrier device of the present invention is installed at the trunk forward end and suspended between the passenger compartment and the trunk compartment, cargo of a predetermined mass in the trunk, compartment is restrained from entering the passenger compartment under predetermined frontal crash conditions.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1739893 (1929-12-01), Fedderman
patent: 2669402 (1954-02-01), Del Mar
patent: 2854931 (1958-10-01), Campbell
patent: 2997331 (1961-08-01), Kudner
patent: 3044800 (1962-07-01), Wicker
patent: 3049373 (1962-08-01), B'ggers
patent: 3169781 (1965-02-01), Arbuzzino
patent: 3190686 (1965-06-01), Smiler
patent: 3367707 (1968-02-01), Merriweather
patent: 3486723 (1969-12-01), Harrison
patent: 3534998 (1970-10-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 3695698 (1972-10-01), Trump
patent: 4173369 (1979-11-01), Roggin
patent: 4213636 (1980-07-01), King
patent: 4215895 (1980-08-01), Phillips
patent: 4303367 (1981-12-01), Bott
patent: 4368902 (1983-01-01), McDowell
patent: 4763944 (1988-08-01), Fry et al.
patent: 4919467 (1990-04-01), Guimelli
patent: 5026231 (1991-06-01), Moore
patent: 5090856 (1992-02-01), Moore
patent: 5121958 (1992-06-01), Goeden
Bateman Brian
Moore Donal
Polytech Netting, L.P.
Young & Basile P.C.
LandOfFree
Load restraining vehicular barrier device does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Load restraining vehicular barrier device, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Load restraining vehicular barrier device will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2999354