Live media delivery over a packet-based computer network

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer-to-computer protocol implementing – Computer-to-computer data streaming

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C709S203000, C709S219000, C709S227000, C700S094000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07979570

ABSTRACT:
In general, this disclosure describes techniques of determining a backset for client devices attempting to download data of a live transmission. A backset is an amount of temporal delay that the client devices are delayed by when viewing the live transmission. As described herein, a media content provider may determine a recommended backset for each client devices based characteristics of the client device. Each client device may then be backset by the determined value, or may calculate its own backset based on the recommended backset. Establishing a backset for each client device may avoid rebuffering of live transmission data.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4881264 (1989-11-01), Merkle
patent: 6141659 (2000-10-01), Barker et al.
patent: 6195680 (2001-02-01), Goldszmidt et al.
patent: 6339785 (2002-01-01), Feigenbaum
patent: 6477522 (2002-11-01), Young
patent: 6742023 (2004-05-01), Fanning et al.
patent: 6771674 (2004-08-01), Schuster et al.
patent: 6772337 (2004-08-01), Yener
patent: 7047309 (2006-05-01), Baumann et al.
patent: 7133368 (2006-11-01), Zhang et al.
patent: 7251691 (2007-07-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 7277950 (2007-10-01), Chapweske
patent: 7555559 (2009-06-01), Chapweske
patent: 2001/0051996 (2001-12-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 2002/0002708 (2002-01-01), Arye
patent: 2002/0003541 (2002-01-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 2002/0049760 (2002-04-01), Scott et al.
patent: 2002/0065922 (2002-05-01), Shastri
patent: 2002/0108112 (2002-08-01), Wallace et al.
patent: 2002/0133247 (2002-09-01), Smith et al.
patent: 2002/0138443 (2002-09-01), Schran et al.
patent: 2004/0078470 (2004-04-01), Baumeister et al.
patent: 2004/0193900 (2004-09-01), Nair
patent: 2004/0205093 (2004-10-01), Li et al.
patent: 2005/0010792 (2005-01-01), Carpentier et al.
patent: 2005/0021575 (2005-01-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 2005/0102371 (2005-05-01), Aksu
patent: 2005/0183120 (2005-08-01), Jain et al.
patent: 2006/0026161 (2006-02-01), Henseler
patent: 2006/0235883 (2006-10-01), Krebs
patent: 2007/0078876 (2007-04-01), Hayashi et al.
patent: 2007/0088844 (2007-04-01), Seims
patent: 2007/0157267 (2007-07-01), Lopez-Estrada
patent: 2008/0050096 (2008-02-01), Ryu
patent: 2008/0201416 (2008-08-01), Lipton
patent: 1 298 931 (2003-04-01), None
patent: 1 638 333 (2006-03-01), None
patent: 2 395 387 (2004-05-01), None
patent: WO 2007/063430 (2007-06-01), None
patent: WO 2009/075766 (2009-06-01), None
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration from corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2009/043484, mailed Nov. 23, 2009, (11 pages).
Rejaie et al., “Architectural Considerations for Playback of Quality Adaptive Video Over the Internet”, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Networks, Sep. 2000, (pp. 204-209).
Wang, “Traffic Regulation under the Percentile-Based Pricing Policy”, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Scalable Information Systems, Jun. 2006, (8 pages).
Duffield et al., “Issues of Quality and Multiplexing When Smoothing Rate Adaptive Video”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 1, No. 4, Dec. 1999, (13 pgs.).
Gürses et al., “A Simple and Effectives Mechanism for Stored Video Streaming with TCP Transport and Server-Side Adaptive Frame Discard”, Computer Networks, 48, Dec. 30, 2004, (pp. 489-501).
Birney, “Intelligent Streaming”, Inside Windows Media, Nov. 19, 1999, XP-002177089, (9 pgs.).
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) for corresponding patent application No. PCT/US2009/043484, mailed Nov. 25, 2010, 7 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/252,782, entitled “Media Playback Point Seeking Using Data Range Requests,” filed Oct. 16, 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,139, filed Dec. 4, 2008, entitled “Dynamic Bit Rate Scaling.”
U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,589, filed Jun. 17, 2009, entitled “Dynamic Media Bit Rates Based on Enterprise Data Transfer Policies”.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/073,542, filed Jun. 18, 2008, entitled “Dynamic Media Bit Rates Based on Enterprise Data Transfer Policies”.
Kaminsky, D., “Vectorcast: A Proposal Regarding the efficient Distribution of Data on High Bandwidth Networks,” Jan. 12, 1998, 4 pages.
Francis, P., “Yallcast: Extending the Internet Multicast Architecture,” Sep. 30, 1999, pp. 1-39.
Byers, J. et al., “Accessing Multiple Mirror Sites in Parallel: Using Tornado Codes to Speed Up Downloads,” Apr. 1999, pp. 275-283.
Dessent, Brian, “Brian's BitTorrent FAQ and Guide”, May 10, 2003, accessed from http://www.dessent.net/btfaq, 40 pgs.
Koman, Richard, “The Swarmcast Solution”, May 24, 2001, accessed from http://openp2p.com/Ipt/a/883, 4 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,128, entitled “Parallel Data Transfer Over Multiple Channels With Data Order Prioritization”, filed Jun. 23, 2009.
Padmanabhan et al., “Distributing Streaming Media Content Using Cooperative Networking”, Proceedings of the 12thInternational Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio: NOSSDAV, May 12-14, 2002, pp. 177-186.
Byers et al., “A Digital Fountain Approach to Reliable Distribution of Bulk Data”, Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, ACM Press, New York, 1998, pp. 56-67.
V.K. Goyal, “Multiple Description Coding: Compression Meets the Network”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 18, 2001, pp. 74-93.
Chu et al., “A Case for End System Multicast”, Proceedings ACM SIGMETRICS 2000: International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, Jun. 17-21, 2001, pp. 1-12.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/861,774, entitled “Packet Transfer Mechanism Over a Peer to Peer Network”, filed Sep. 26, 2007.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Live media delivery over a packet-based computer network does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Live media delivery over a packet-based computer network, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Live media delivery over a packet-based computer network will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2689356

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.