Chemistry: electrical current producing apparatus – product – and – Fluid active material or two-fluid electrolyte combination... – Active material in solution
Reexamination Certificate
2000-02-01
2002-03-19
Kalafut, Stephen (Department: 1745)
Chemistry: electrical current producing apparatus, product, and
Fluid active material or two-fluid electrolyte combination...
Active material in solution
C429S329000, C429S337000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06358643
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to metal-sulfur batteries (e.g., lithium-sulfur batteries).
The rapid proliferation of portable electronic devices in the international marketplace has led to a corresponding increase in the demand for advanced secondary batteries (i.e., rechargeable batteries). The miniaturization of such devices as, for example, cellular phones, laptop computers, etc., has naturally fueled the desire for rechargeable batteries having high specific energies (light weight). At the same time, mounting concerns regarding the environmental impact of throwaway technologies, has caused a discernible shift away from primary batteries and towards rechargeable systems.
In addition, heightened awareness concerning toxic waste has motivated, in part, efforts to replace toxic cadmium electrodes in nickel/cadmium batteries with the more benign hydrogen storage electrodes in nickel/metal hydride cells. For the above reasons, there is a strong market potential for environmentally benign secondary battery technologies.
Secondary batteries are in widespread use in modern society, particularly in applications where large amounts of energy are not required. However, it is desirable to use batteries in applications requiring considerable power, and much effort has been expended in developing batteries suitable for high specific energy, medium power applications, such as, for electric vehicles and load leveling. Of course, such batteries would also be suitable for use in lower power applications such as cameras or portable recording devices. Primary batteries having specific energies and high power densities also find use in many applications.
Among the factors leading to the successful development of high specific energy batteries is the fundamental need for high cell voltage and low equivalent weight electrode materials. Electrode materials must also fulfill the basic electrochemical requirements of sufficient electronic and ionic conductivity, high reversibility of the oxidation/reduction reaction, as well as excellent thermal and chemical stability within the temperature range for a particular application. Importantly, the electrode materials must be reasonably inexpensive, widely available, non-explosive, non-toxic, and easy to process.
Thus, a smaller, lighter, cheaper, non-toxic battery is sought for the next generation of batteries. The low equivalent weight of lithium renders it attractive as a battery electrode component for improving weight ratios. Lithium also provides greater energy per volume than do the traditional battery standards, nickel and cadmium.
The low equivalent weight and low cost of sulfur and its nontoxicity renders it also an attractive candidate battery component. Successful lithium/organosulfur battery cells are known. (See, De Jonghe et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,833,048 and 4,917,974; and Visco et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,162,175.)
Recent developments in ambient-temperature sulfur electrode technology may provide commercially viable rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chu and colleagues are largely responsible for these developments which are described in the above-referenced U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,582,623 and 5,523,179 (issued to Chu). These developments allow electrochemical utilization of elemental sulfur at levels of 50% and higher over multiple cycles. Because sulfur has a theoretical maximum capacity of 1675 mAh/g (assuming all sulfur atoms in an electrode are fully reduced during discharge), the utilization of sulfur in lithium-sulfur cells as described in the above Chu patents typically exceeds 800 milliamp-hours per gram (mAh/g) of sulfur. Chu's initial work focused on solid and gel-state batteries in which a solid or gel-state ionic conductor was immobilized with the sulfur in an electrode.
Prior to Chu's work, rechargeable ambient-temperature lithium-sulfur batteries were not considered commercially viable. The limited research that was conducted in the field almost universally employed liquid electrolytes which served not only as ionic transport media between the anode and cathode, but also as ionic conductors within the sulfur electrode. Without exception, these electrodes suffered from poor utilization of the sulfur electrode over repeated cycling. For example, one of the best reported rechargeable lithium-sulfur liquid electrolyte batteries cycled 120 times, but had a maximum sulfur utilization of only 5%. See Rauh, R. D., Pearson, G. F. and Brummer, S. B., “Rechageability Studies of Ambient Temperature Lithium/Sulfur Batteries”, 12
TH
IECEC, 283-287 (1977). Other rechargeable systems had higher sulfur utilizations, but unacceptably low cycle lives. For example, one group reports a maximum sulfur utilization of about 45%, but their cell was dead by 50 cycles and, during cycling, had a utilization of only about 25%. See Peled, E., Gorenshtein, A., Segal, M., Sternberg, Y., “Rechargeable Lithium-Sulfur Battery (Extended Abstract)”, J. Power Sources, 26, 269-271, (1989). Because of their poor cycling performance, the vast majority of prior lithium-battery systems were at best deemed suitable only as primary batteries. And even then, they were only functional at very low current densities. In addition, some researchers have concluded that liquid electrolyte/sulfur cells will be intrinsic limited to poor performance. See Coleman, J. R. and Bates, M. W., “The Sulfur Electrode”, 289-302 (1968)
Other references to lithium-sulfur battery systems in liquid formats include the following: Yamin et al., “Lithium Sulfur Battery,”
J. Electrochem. Soc.,
135(5): 1045 (May 1988); Yamin and Peled, “Electrochemistry of a Nonaqueous Lithium/Sulfur Cell,”
J. Power Sources,
9: 281 (1983); Peled et al., “Lithium-Sulfur Battery: Evaluation of Dioxolane-Based Electrolytes,”
J. Electrochem. Soc.,
136(6): 1621 (June 1989); Bennett et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,469,761; Farrington and Roth, U.S. Pat. No. 3,953,231; Nole and Moss, U.S. Pat. No. 3,532,543; Lauck, H., U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,915,743 and 3,907,591; Societe des Accumulateurs Fixes et de Traction, “Lithium-sulfur battery,”
Chem. Abstracts,
66: Abstract No. 111055d at page 10360 (1967); and Lauck, H. “Electric storage battery with negative lithium electrode and positive sulfur electrode,”
Chem. Abstracts,
80: Abstract No. 9855 at pages 466-467 (1974).).
It now appears that the poor performance of the prior art lithium-sulfur cells resulted from various design flaws. For example, many cells employed large reservoirs of liquid electrolyte in which sulfide and polysulfide discharge products dissolved, diffused away from the positive electrode, and became unavailable for further electrochemical reaction, thereby reducing the cell's capacity. In addition, it is likely that the prior art cells were operated under conditions in which their discharge products were irreversibly precipitated out of solution, thereby reducing capacity.
Still further, poor performance of the prior art cells may result from failure to optimize the catholyte composition in conjunction with the cathode structure. Many prior art cathodes made use of traditional carbon structures including high surface area carbon and binder pressed into expanded metal. There are many disadvantages to such a design. First the pore structure of such cathodes limits the transport rate of dissolved sulfur species which leads to premature precipitation of sulfide discharge products that leads to clogging of the positive electrode and then to cell polarization. Second, such cathodes may not have had an open pore structure, so that a significant part of the sulfur capacity is retained outside of the active area of the electrode.
What is needed therefore is a safe liquid electrolyte metal-sulfur battery system optimized for the chemical and electrochemical features of the sulfur rechargeable electrode.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides high performance thin film lithium-sulfur battery cells having liquid electrolytes. The cells preferably include the following features: (a) a negative electrode including a metal or an
Chu May-Ying
DeJonghe Lutgard C.
Katz Bruce D.
Visco Steven J.
Beyer Weaver & Thomas LLP
Kalafut Stephen
PolyPlus Battery Company
LandOfFree
Liquid electrolyte lithium-sulfur batteries does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Liquid electrolyte lithium-sulfur batteries, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Liquid electrolyte lithium-sulfur batteries will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2886705