Amplifiers – Hum or noise or distortion bucking introduced into signal...
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-08
2002-03-05
Pascal, Robert (Department: 2817)
Amplifiers
Hum or noise or distortion bucking introduced into signal...
C330S151000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06353360
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a linearized power amplifier based on active feedforward-type predistortion, and more particularly to linear power amplifiers for low distortion amplification of digitally modulated signals in cellular and satellite communication systems. More particularly, the invention relates to such a power amplifier for monolithic microwave integrated circuit (JAMIC) realization which includes an active feedforward-type predistorter and an output power amplifier and in which the predistorter amplifies and distorts the incoming signals for compensating the amplitude and phase nonlinearities of the output power amplifier and enhancing the PAE (power added efficiency) for linear amplification of incoming signals.
Digital modulation schemes are widely employed in various multi-carrier communication systems, such as wireless and satellite, for capacity improvement, better transmitted quality and high data rate transmission. In non-constant envelope digital modulation schemes, information is contained in both amplitude and phase of the modulated signals. To amplify such signals, linear amplifiers are required to prevent distorting the amplitude and phase characteristics which would degrade signal quality. In addition, linear amplifiers are also beneficial in amplifying multi-carrier signals simultaneously, in applications such as cellular basestations, without creating significant distortion. The advantage of employing linear amplifiers is that it reduces the number of amplifiers used as well as eliminates high power combiner chains, which is the conventional configuration for combining output power from several less linear amplifiers to limit distortion. This directly results in reducing size, complexity and cost of the overall amplification systems which is critical in applications such as satellite systems and cellular base stations. In addition to its low distortion characteristics, linear amplifiers should also attain high efficiency such that their DC power consumption can be minimized, resulting in higher performance, reliability and reduction of operating costs. Such features of linear amplifiers are highly desirable in all communication systems, and, in particular, cellular handsets in wireless systems wherein the overall size can be miniaturized and battery life, therefore the standby and talk time, can be significantly improved as a direct consequence of improved amplifier efficiency which is a primary concern in handset design.
To achieve linear amplification of non-constant envelope modulated signals in wireless communication systems, for instance, conventional amplifiers usually operate at certain output power backoff from saturated power in order to meet the linearity requirement. The tradeoff of this is a low PAE on the amplifiers since peak PAE is usually achieved near saturated output power level. By backing off from that operation, amplifiers could suffer as much as 30% to 40% reduction in PAE which has an adverse effect on DC power consumption, and, in particular, the battery life in cellular handsets.
The drawback of low efficiency on conventional linear amplifiers can be overcome by employing amplifier linearization techniques. Amplifier linearization techniques require the use of external circuitry to reduce distortion level at the output of amplifiers, thus allowing the amplifiers to operate into more efficient but nonlinear region, achieving high efficiency and good linearity simultaneously.
Common linearization techniques such as feedforward, predistortion, and feedback techniques have been disclosed in “Feedfoward—An alternative approach to amplifier linearization,” by T. J. Bennett et al., The Radio and Electronic Engineer, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 257-262, May 1974; “Feedforward linearization of 950 MHz amplifiers,” by R. D. Stewart et al., IEEE Proceedings-H, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 347-350, October 1988; U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,162 by Danielsons; “An automatically controlled predistorter for multilevel quadrature amplitude modulation,’ by J. Namiki, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-31, no. 5, pp. 707-712, May 1983; U.S. Pat. No. 4,465,980 by Huang et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,523,716 by Grebliunas et al.; “An MMAC C-Band FET feedback power amplifier,” by A. K. Ezzeddine et al., IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-38, no. 4, pp. 350-357, April 1990; “Linearisation of microwave power amplifiers using active feedback networks,” by F. Perez et al., Electron Lett., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 9-10, January 1985; “An MMIC linearized amplifier using active feedback,” by J. C. Pedro et al., 1993 IEEE MTT-S Dig., pp. 95-98; U.S. Pat. No. 5,886,572 by Myers et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,814 by Katayama et al. These techniques, however, usually involve either complex circuit configurations or experience possible stability problem which limit their practical applications in miniaturized cellular handsets.
Recently, predistorters with simpler configuration have been disclosed in “A normal amplitude and phase linearizing technique for microwave power amplifiers,” M. Nakayama et al., 1995 IEER MTT-S Dig., pp. 1451-1454; “A novel series diode linearizer for mobile radio power amplifiers,” by K. Yamauchi et al., 1996 IEEE MTT-S Dig., pp. 831-834; “Passive FETMMIC linearizers for C, X and Ku-band satellite applications,” A. Katz et al., 1993 IEEE MTT-S Dig., pp. 353-356; U.S. Pat. No. 5,191,338 by Katz et al. Although these predistortions achieve size reduction over conventional designs, they still require extra matching circuits, experience high loss and poor isolation which increase the difficulty in practical use. These are best illustrated by reference to the conventional miniaturized predistorter design shown in FIG.
1
.
FIG. 1
shows a typical small-size passive type predistorter
104
, including a nonlinearity generator
102
, input matching circuit
101
and output matching circuit
103
. The matching circuits usually include inductors which would take up significant area in an MMIC and increase the cost of the overall design.
FIG. 2
shows a conventional configuration of a linearized power amplifier
206
. The passive type predistorter
104
, as illustrated in
FIG. 1
, is employed to compensate the nonlinear characteristics of a power amplifier
205
. An isolator
201
and buffer amplifier
203
are required to compensate the poor reverse isolation and insertion loss of the predistorter
104
, respectively. Matching circuits
202
and
204
are employed to match the input and output of the buffer amplifier
204
to the isolator
201
and the power amplifier
205
, respectively. The disadvantages of this configuration include the requirement of extra matching circuits
202
and
204
, buffer amplifier
203
and isolator
201
, which increases the overall size of the linearized amplifier
206
, and extra DC power consumption required by the buffer amplifier
203
. The linearized amplifier
206
is, therefore, not practical for cellular handset applications which demands small size and low overall power consumption.
While prior art of low complexity passive type predistorter eliminates the use of bulky element. Such as power combiners, variable attenuators and phase shifters usually employed in conventional design, it includes nonlinearity generator with input and output matching. circuits. When cascaded with a power amplifier, the output matching of the predistorter duplicates the function of the input matching circuit of the amplifier. Since matching circuits usually include inductors which require large area to realize on MMICs, this increases the size of the chip and the colt of the overall design which are a critical concern for handset power amplifiers, and might not be feasible for volume production. In addition, conventional predistorters usually experience poor reverse isolation. Power amplifiers incorporating the predistorters require additional isolators to improve circuit isolation to avoid interaction between the predistorters and amplifier stages which would degrade overall circuit performance. Isolators usually comes
Hau Gary
Iwata Naotaka
Choe Henry
NEC Corporation
Pascal Robert
LandOfFree
Linearized power amplifier based on active feedforward-type... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Linearized power amplifier based on active feedforward-type..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Linearized power amplifier based on active feedforward-type... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2829278