Linearization scheme for voltage controlled oscillator

Oscillators – Automatic frequency stabilization using a phase or frequency... – Particular frequency control means

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C331S17700V, C331S167000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06396356

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) modulation. More particularly, this invention relates to varactor-based VCO fm-modulation
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) circuits are well known in the art and are utilized in a number of applications. For example, VCO circuits are used in phase-locked loop (PLL) circuits in high frequency applications such as wireless communications. A PLL is a component used in communications circuitry that enables communications equipment to quickly “lock” onto a specifically selected frequency, typically the carrier frequency over which communications are sent. This fast locking ability is particularly important for devices such as cellular telephones, where the cell phones are desired to instantly switch carrier frequencies when traveling through different cellular zones or “cells”. A VCO is an essential component of a PLL, whose output voltage is controllable by the application of an input control voltage. However, a VCO is very sensitive to fluctuations in a control voltage. The sensitivity of a VCO is typically expressed as MHz per volt.
Typically, a VCO circuit includes a variable element such as a capacitor that may be varied to adjust the frequency of an output signal of the VCO circuit. In a LC tank based VCO circuit, the frequency of the VCO circuit is determined by the inductance (L) and capacitance (C) of the tank circuit. By utilizing a varactor to function as a capacitor in the LC tank circuit, the capacitance of the VCO circuit can be varied by changing the voltage applied to the varactor. Thus, the frequency of the LC tank based VCO circuit is varied accordingly. However, the transfer characteristic of varactors is similar to reverse biased diodes which have a nonlinear transfer characteristic. Thus, a symmetric voltage swing would result in an asymmetric deviation. Accordingly, sensitivity of a VCO is affected due to a non-linearized varactor.
FIG. 1
shows a schematic diagram illustrating a conventional LC tank based VCO circuit. VCO circuit
20
generally includes an active device, such as an amplifier
22
, and a LC tank circuit
30
(labeled in dash lines). The amplifier
22
includes a first input
24
adapted for receiving a first input signal and a second input
26
adapted for receiving a second input signal. In this case, the second input
26
is connected to ground. The output of the amplifier
22
is an input of the LC tank circuit
30
. An output of the LC tank circuit
30
is fed back to the first input
24
. The LC tank circuit
30
is formed by an inductor
32
having inductance Lo, a capacitor
34
having capacitance C
LARGE
and a variable capacitor or varactor
36
having capacitance C(V) which is controlled by a voltage V. The inductor
32
is connected between node
38
and ground. One end of the capacitor
34
is connected to node
38
, and the other end of the capacitor
34
is connected to the varactor
36
. The other end of the varactor
36
is connected to ground.
The LC tank circuit
30
is operable to provide an output signal
40
, whose frequency is determined by the inductance L
0
, the capacitance C
LARGE
, and the capacitance C(V). The frequency is changed by varying the capacitance C(V) of the varactor
36
which is controlled by the voltage V. As stated above, because the varactor
36
inherently has a nonlinear transfer characteristic, a symmetric voltage swing would result in an asymmetric deviation of the frequency. As shown in
FIG. 2
, during modulation, the symmetric deviation in voltage, i.e., +&Dgr;V, −&Dgr;V, results in different deviation in capacitance, &Dgr;C
1
and &Dgr;C
2
(&Dgr;C
1
≠&Dgr;C
2
), respectively, which in turn results in different frequency deviation. The resulting frequency f(V) equals to [L
0
×C′(V)]
−½
, wherein L
0
is the inductance of the inductor
32
, and C′(V) is the equivalent load capacitance of the capacitor
34
and the varactor
36
in series.
In order to solve the asymmetry problem, there is a need to provide an improved VCO circuit for equalizing the positive frequency deviation and the negative frequency deviation for a varactor-based VCO fm-modulation.
It is with respect to this and other considerations that the present invention has been made.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
To overcome the limitations in the prior art described above, and to overcome other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention provides a technique for equalizing a positive frequency deviation and a negative frequency deviation for a varactor-based VCO fm-modulation. In one embodiment, two varactors are used.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the VCO comprises an active device, such as an amplifier, having a first input and a second input, and a LC tank circuit coupled to an output of the amplifier. An output of the LC tank circuit is fed back to the first input of the amplifier, while the second input of the amplifier is connected to ground. In the LC tank circuit, first and second varactors are provided. The first varactor is in series connection with a first capacitor having a first fixed capacitance. The second varactor is in series connection with a second capacitor having a second fixed capacitance. The LC tank circuit further includes an inductor which is in parallel to the series of the first varactor and the first capacitor, and in parallel to the series of the second varactor and the second capacitor.
In operation in accordance with the present invention, the VCO may be operated in a normal condition and positive
egative deviation conditions. In the normal condition, the control voltage for a first varactor is set to V
A
such that a load capacitance in a first series is C
A
, while the control voltage for the other varactor is set to V
B
such that a load capacitance in a second series is C
B
. Thus, the total load capacitance in the normal condition is C
A
+C
B
. During the positive deviation, the control voltage for both varactors is set to V
A
such that the total load capacitance is
2
C
A
. During the negative deviation, the control voltage for both varactors is set to V
B
such that the total load capacitance is
2
C
B
. Accordingly, the deviation in the load capacitance, &Dgr;C, for both negative and positive deviation is equal to C
A
−C
B
. Thus, &Dgr;f is the same for both positive deviation and negative deviation. The nonlinearity of varactor based fm-modulation has thus been solved by providing a linearization scheme, such as using two varactors.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4755774 (1988-07-01), Heck
patent: 4866404 (1989-09-01), Vandegraaf
patent: 5107228 (1992-04-01), Pham et al.
patent: 5254958 (1993-10-01), Flach et al.
patent: 5258726 (1993-11-01), Pham
patent: 5493715 (1996-02-01), Humphreys et al.
patent: 5521947 (1996-05-01), Madsen
patent: 5650754 (1997-07-01), Joshi et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Linearization scheme for voltage controlled oscillator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Linearization scheme for voltage controlled oscillator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Linearization scheme for voltage controlled oscillator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2872263

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.