Electricity: electrical systems and devices – Safety and protection of systems and devices – High voltage dissipation
Reexamination Certificate
2001-06-15
2003-06-24
Jackson, Stephen W. (Department: 2836)
Electricity: electrical systems and devices
Safety and protection of systems and devices
High voltage dissipation
C361S002000, C361S056000, C361S015000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06583978
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to electric power circuit interrupters and, more particularly, relates to a circuit interrupter with limited restrike capability suitable for use as a line capacitor and load switch. The interrupter, which is disconnected from the circuit in normal operation, includes a bidirectional freewheeling toggle mechanism and a bellows around a relatively slow moving actuator shaft to minimize wear and tear imposed on the interrupter through repetitive cycles.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A circuit interrupter is a disconnect switch used to periodically disconnect and reconnect an electrical power transmission, sub-transmission or distribution line from a connected device, such as a load, a line capacitor, a voltage regulator, or another type of device. Circuit interrupters typically include two or more contacts that are in physical contact with one another when the electric power line is connected to the switched device, and that are physically separated when the line is disconnected from the switched device. The interrupter is said to be in the “closed position” when the contacts are in contact with each other, and in the “open position” when the contacts are separated.
For an electric power line that carries high voltage and/or high current, it is desirable to open the male and female contacts quickly to avoid a restrike, in which the electric current arcs across a physical gap between the contacts. Restrikes impose high current spikes and serious voltage disturbances on the power line, and can also physically degrade the components of the interrupter, especially the contacts. These current spikes and voltage disturbances can also damage other pieces of equipment connected to the power line. Sensitive loads, such as computers and other electronic devices, are particularly vulnerable to this type of damage. Generally, the wider the arc gap during a restrike, the higher the voltage required to breakdown the gap, and the larger the current spike and the associated risk of damage.
Restrikes occur when the interrupter's contacts are not in physical contact, but are still close enough to each other to permit electric current to arc through the air or other media between the contacts. When the contacts of a properly designed circuit interrupter are fully separated, the distance between the contacts is sufficient to prohibit restrikes. However, a restrike can occur as the contacts are moved through an “opening stroke” from the fully connected or closed position to the fully separated position or open position. Likewise, an arc can occur across a gap between the contacts as the contacts are moved through a “closing stroke” from the open position to the closed position. However, arcs during a closing stroke are less dangerous to the electric system because the current in the circuit is zero prior to reconnection, which greatly reduces the current spike caused by the arc. Nevertheless, for safety reasons it may desirable to control the arcs during reconnection of the circuit interrupter.
Restrikes typically occur because once the circuit is opened at a zero voltage crossing, there is a rapid rise in voltage across the contacts known as the “transient recovery voltage.” If the interrupter's contacts are not separated quickly enough for the gap between the contacts (the “arc gap”) to withstand this rising voltage, then the gap breaks down and the current flow arcs across the gap and results in a restrike. A first restrike generally occurs at or near the point when the transient recovery voltage reaches its maximum value, which is typically one-quarter of a cycle from the zero voltage crossing when the circuit was initially opened. Thus, to prevent a restrike, the contacts must be moved from the closed position to a position at which a restrike is impossible within one-quarter of a cycle.
On an opening stroke in which the arc gap increases quickly, a second restrike is much more severe than the first because the arc gap is much larger. For this reason, in certain applications a maximum of one restrike is permitted. To meet this one-restrike-maximum, the contacts must be moved from the fully connected position to a position at which a restrike is impossible within three-quarters of a cycle. In particular, governmental regulations and municipal codes generally permit a maximum of one restrike per transmission or distribution line disconnection. Thus, the actuator mechanism of a typical interrupter must be capable of opening the contacts at a separation velocity sufficient to prevent multiple restrike (i.e., more than one) once the initial arc extinction occurs at a current zero.
Usually, a human operator of an interrupter cannot create enough energy to separate the contacts of an interrupter in a short enough time without a mechanical advantage. Thus, separation velocity is typically provided by an actuator mechanism, usually a spring arrangement, in the circuit interrupter. A typical spring arrangement stores potential energy in a spring-type actuator mechanism and then releases the spring energy abruptly to produce the desired separation velocity. Of course, higher separation velocity can often be accomplished by a more robust actuator mechanism. However, the designer of the circuit interrupter is also concerned with the cost and durability of the resulting device.
The designer therefore takes the intended use of the circuit interrupter into account when designing the circuit interrupter. For example, disconnection is often required to perform maintenance on the electrical power line or on a device connected to the line downstream from the disconnect switch, such as a transformer or voltage regulator. A disconnect capability may also be required for fault protection. A conventional circuit breaker is typically used as the circuit interrupter for these applications. In this application, the circuit breaker can be expected to cycle several dozen or a hundred or so times over its life span.
Line capacitor switches, on the other hand, can be expected to cycle much more frequently. This is because a line capacitor is typically switched into connection with the electric power line to correct the power factor during high-load periods. The line capacitor is later switched out of the circuit when the load drops and the power factor correction afforded by the capacitor is no longer needed. Because electric power loads typically peak on a daily or twice-daily basis, capacitor switches typically cycle on a daily or twice-daily basis. In addition, certain types of industrial loads, such as coal mines and arc furnaces, often impose peak loads many times each day. Therefore, a capacitor switch can be expected to cycle hundreds or thousands of times over its life span. A load switch, which is typically used to disconnect a discrete distribution voltage load such as customer-owned device or premises, may also experience hundreds or thousands of cycles over a lifetime.
In addition, it is economically feasible to design very expensive transmission voltage circuit breakers to provide fault protection for the transformer, which is a very expensive device. In addition, multiple restrikes at very high voltages can damage the transformer and other connected devices. Transmission voltage circuit breakers have therefore been designed with very robust actuator mechanisms, “penetrating contacts” (e.g., a male “pin” contact and a female “tulip” contact) that fit into each other, sealed chambers that surround the penetrating contacts with a dielectric gas that quenches the arcs within “arc gaps” between the contacts, and nozzles that direct the dielectric gas into the arc gaps as the penetrating contacts separate. Although these features are very effective at minimizing restrikes, they have traditionally been too expensive to be feasible for inclusion in sub-transmission and distribution voltage devices, such as capacitor and load switches.
Conventional circuit breakers have a number of other attributes that make them unsuitable as capacitor or load switches. First and m
Ahrano Cary J.
Berner Brian J.
Rostron Joseph R.
Jackson Stephen W.
Mehrman Law Office PC
Mehrman, Esq Michael J.
Southern States, Inc.
LandOfFree
Limited restrike electric power circuit interrupter suitable... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Limited restrike electric power circuit interrupter suitable..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Limited restrike electric power circuit interrupter suitable... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3110897