Static structures (e.g. – buildings) – With exposed configuration having acoustical function
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-16
2004-04-06
Friedman, Carl D. (Department: 3635)
Static structures (e.g., buildings)
With exposed configuration having acoustical function
C052S145000, C052S481100
Reexamination Certificate
active
06715241
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to building materials and more particularly to materials used for sound insulation.
2. Background Information
In building modern structures, such as single-family houses or commercial buildings, an important factor to consider is noise control. In order to provide a quiet environment, sounds originating from sources such as televisions or conversation must be controlled and reduced to comfortable sound pressure levels. To achieve such an environment, builders and designers must address a multitude of factors, among them the construction and composition of building component assemblies that separate rooms from other rooms or from the outside environment. Such assemblies may, for example, take form as interior walls, exterior walls, ceilings, or floors of a building.
The term “transmission loss” is expressed in decibels (db) and refers to the ratio of the sound energy striking an assembly to the sound energy transmitted through the assembly. A high transmission loss indicates that very little sound energy (relative to the striking sound energy) is being transmitted through an assembly. However, transmission loss varies depending on the frequency of the striking sound energy, i.e., low frequency sounds generally result in lesser transmission loss than high frequency sounds. In order to measure and compare the sound performances of different materials and assemblies (i.e., their abilities to block or absorb sound energy), while also taking into account the varying transmission losses associated with different sound frequencies, builders and designers typically use a single-number rating called Sound Transmission Class (STC), as described by the American Society For Testing and Materials (ASTM). This rating is calculated by measuring, in decibels, the transmission loss at several frequencies under controlled test conditions and then calculating the single-number rating from a prescribed method. When an actual constructed system is concerned (i.e., where conditions such as absorption and interior volume are not controlled in a laboratory environment), the single-number rating describing the acoustical performance of such a system can be expressed as a field STC rating (FSTC), which approximates a STC rating when tested on-site. The higher the FSTC rating of a constructed system, the greater the transmission loss.
A conventional wall assembly
300
(called a wood stud wall) is shown in FIG.
3
and consists of two gypsum boards
303
(also referred to as drywall or sheetrock skins) attached directly to either sides of wood studs
301
. The space between the wood studs
301
may be filled with some type of fibrous insulation
305
(e.g., fiber glass batts). A wall assembly such as assembly
300
generally results in transmission loss values between STC
30
and STC
36
, because although the cavity area between the wood studs
301
is filled with sound insulation material
305
, sound energy can easily pass through the structural connections between the wood studs
301
and the gypsum boards
303
. Accordingly, assembly
300
is generally ineffective in reducing sound energy transmission.
Several methods are currently used by builders to produce wall and ceiling/floor assemblies with higher FSTC ratings than the performance of a basic wood stud configuration. One such method is the use of resilient channels in a wall assembly
400
, shown in
FIG. 4
a
. This method involves inserting one or more thin metal channels
407
between one of the drywall skins
403
and framing members
401
. The resilient channels
407
act as shock absorbers, structural breaks, and leaf springs, reducing the transmission of vibrations between a drywall skin
403
and the framing members
401
. However, the resilient channel technique is difficult to install correctly and requires excessive labor costs. It is very easy to “short out” a resilient channel
407
by improper nailing techniques (e.g., screwing long screws into the wood studs
401
behind the resilient channel
407
). When this occurs, the sound isolation of wall assembly
400
remains unimproved. Similarly, problems relating to the difficulty of installing resilient channels may result when the technique is used to sound-isolate floor-ceiling assemblies.
Other current practices involve staggering the positions of wall studs
401
(as illustrated in
FIG. 4
b
) or using double stud construction (as illustrated in
FIG. 4
c
). These methods create a larger cavity depth and can reduce the structural connections between wall assembly components
401
and
403
, thereby allowing an assembly
400
to achieve relatively high FSTC ratings. However, both of these methods double the cost of framing and increase the thickness of wall assembly
400
by approximately two to four inches.
In addition, various sound absorbing or barrier materials are currently used to provide a structural break between wall studs or floor-ceiling joists and the boards attached to them. Examples of such materials include GyProc® by Georgia-Pacific Gypsum Corporation, 440 Sound-A-Sote™ by Homasote and Temple-Inland SoundChoice™. While capable of providing additional sound-transmission loss, these materials are generally dense and heavy, resulting in high handling and installation costs.
Accordingly, what is needed is a wall or floor-ceiling assembly that includes a material between the framing members and building boards either in sheets or strips that can provide additional substantial sound transmission loss, and is both relatively lightweight and easy to install.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to the installation of a lightweight sound-deadening board in sheets or strips in a wall or floor-ceiling assembly without the need for expensive methods, training, or tools. The lightweight board may be made of compressible material with an optimum range of compressibility. This material may be either non-resilient foam or a resilient non-foam material.
According to a first embodiment of the present invention, a building component assembly is provided comprising at least one assembly framing member, at least one assembly board, and at least one sound-deadening board, wherein the sound-deadening board is made of a substantially non-resiliently compressible material with an optimized compressibility, is positioned between the at least one assembly framing member and the at least one assembly board, and has an Equivalent Young's Modulus (bulk modulus of elasticity) between 50 and 600 pounds per square inch and a thickness between ¼ and 1 inch. This value may be achieved through means of basic material properties (true Young's Modulus), or by the physical alteration of the board to make the modulus appear lower when installed in the described manner. Kerfing, grooving, waffle cuts and boring are all examples of such alterations.
According to a second embodiment of the present invention, a building component assembly is provided comprising at least one assembly framing member, at least one assembly board, and at least one sound-deadening board, wherein the sound-deadening board is made of a substantially resiliently compressible non-foam material with an optimized compressibility, is positioned between the at least one assembly framing member and the at least one assembly board, and has an Equivalent Young's Modulus (bulk modulus of elasticity) between 50 and 600 pounds per square inch and a thickness between ¼ and 1 inch. This value may be achieved through means of basic material properties (true Young's Modulus), or by the physical alteration of the board to make the modulus appear lower when installed in the described manner. Kerfing, grooving, waffle cuts and boring are all examples of such alterations.
According to a third embodiment of the present invention, a method of installing a sound-deadening board in building component assembly is provided, comprising the steps of attaching at least one sound-deadening board to at least one
Babineau Francis
Battaglioli Mauro Vittorio
Dawson Steve
Fay Ralph Michael
Gelin Lawrence J.
Friedman Carl D.
Johns Manville International Inc.
Katcheves Basil
Touslee Robert D.
LandOfFree
Lightweight sound-deadening board does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Lightweight sound-deadening board, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Lightweight sound-deadening board will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3193872