Optical: systems and elements – Extended spacing structure for optical elements – Extension of tubular element adjustable
Reexamination Certificate
2000-06-12
2002-05-28
Shafer, Ricky D. (Department: 2872)
Optical: systems and elements
Extended spacing structure for optical elements
Extension of tubular element adjustable
C359S490020, C359S490020, C359S487030, C362S019000, C362S257000, C362S260000, C362S296040, C428S212000, C428S421000, C428S480000, C428S483000, C428S522000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06396631
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates to light sources adapted to efficiently produce light of a particular polarization.
BACKGROUND
Many applications require polarized light to function properly. One example of such an application are optical displays, such as liquid crystal displays (LCDs), which are widely used for lap-top computers, hand-held calculators, digital watches, automobile dashboard displays and the like. Another such application is task lighting configurations for increased contrast and glare reduction.
To produce polarized light, a light source is typically coupled with one or more absorptive polarizers. These polarizers use dichroic dyes which transmit light of one polarization orientation more strongly than the orthogonal polarization orientation. Dichroic polarizers are very inefficient, however, in that light of the orthogonal polarization is largely absorbed and is therefore unavailable for application illumination. For example, a typical dichroic polarizer transmits only about 35-45% of the incident light emitted by a standard display backlight. This inefficiency is a major disadavantage to dichroic polarizers, as the light which is absorbed is not available for the associated application. In an LCD display, for example, the absorbed light does not contribute to the illumination, and thus the overall brightness, of the LCD.
Vacuum deposited, thin film dielectric polarizers are not absorbing, as are dichroic polarizers, but do suffer other disadvantages, such as poor angular response and poor spectral transmission for non-designed wavelengths. In addition, they are conventionally coated onto stable substrates, such as bulk optical glass or polymer substrates, which render them too bulky and heavy for use in applications requiring light weight and small profile.
Current technology, for LCD illumination, makes no attempt at polarization control other than use of inefficient, dichroic polarizers. Current technology, for glare reduction in task lighting and vehicle displays, does not use polarizers at all due to the inefficiencies of dichroics, and the bulk and angle performance of vacuum deposited dielectric polarizers.
SUMMARY
The present polarized light sources described herein include a diffuse light source and a reflective polarizing element placed proximate thereto. The reflective polarizing element transmits light of a desired polarization and reflects light of another polarization back into the diffuse source. The light of the rejected polarization is reflected back into the diffuse source and is randomized. Some of the initially rejected light is thus converted into the desired polarization and is transmitted through the reflective polarizing element. This process continues, and the repeated reflections and subsequent randomization of light of the undesired polarization increases the amount of light of the desired polarization that is emitted by the polarized light source.
The diffuse source consists of a light emitting region and a light reflecting, scattering and depolarizing region. The source may be a fluorescent lamp, incandescent lamp, solid-state source or electroluminescent (EL) light source.
The reflective polarizing element may be a tilted dielectric film coated on a glass substrate, bulk optic or structured surface. The reflective polarizing element may also be a multilayered, birefringent polymeric film.
In a typical application, the polarized light source is used to illuminate an optical display, such as a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD). For this purpose, the polarized light source is used in combination with a means for delivering the polarized light to an optical display. This can include free space propagation, a lens system, or a polarization preserving light guide.
The polarized light source may also be used in various task lighting configurations such as vehicle dashboard displays, or fluorescent fixtures in an office lighting environment. For glare reduction, the polarized light source is placed to provide illumination to a specific task location where a manual or visual task is being performed.
REFERENCES:
patent: 540768 (1895-06-01), Western
patent: 2432867 (1947-12-01), Dreyer
patent: 2776598 (1957-01-01), Dreyer
patent: 3124639 (1964-03-01), Kahn
patent: 3213753 (1965-10-01), Rogers
patent: 3423498 (1969-01-01), Lefevre
patent: 3480502 (1969-11-01), Schrenk
patent: 3498873 (1970-03-01), Schrenk
patent: 3556635 (1971-01-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 3565985 (1971-02-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 3610729 (1971-10-01), Rogers
patent: 3631288 (1971-12-01), Rogers
patent: 3647612 (1972-03-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 3711176 (1973-01-01), Alfrey, Jr. et al.
patent: 3712980 (1973-01-01), Norton
patent: 3746485 (1973-07-01), Schrenk
patent: 3759647 (1973-09-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 3773882 (1973-11-01), Schrenk
patent: 3801429 (1974-04-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 3847585 (1974-11-01), Chisholm
patent: 3860036 (1975-01-01), Newman, Jr.
patent: 3912920 (1975-10-01), Kubota
patent: 4094947 (1978-06-01), Alfrey, Jr. et al.
patent: 4161014 (1979-07-01), Dey et al.
patent: 4190832 (1980-02-01), Mohler
patent: 4212048 (1980-07-01), Castleberry
patent: 4268127 (1981-05-01), Oshima et al.
patent: 4307150 (1981-12-01), Roche
patent: 4310584 (1982-01-01), Cooper et al.
patent: 4312570 (1982-01-01), Southwell
patent: 4315258 (1982-02-01), McKnight et al.
patent: 4446305 (1984-05-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 4520189 (1985-05-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 4521588 (1985-06-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 4525413 (1985-06-01), Rogers et al.
patent: 4540623 (1985-09-01), Im et al.
patent: 4542449 (1985-09-01), Whitehead
patent: 4586790 (1986-05-01), Umeda et al.
patent: 4590119 (1986-05-01), Kawakami et al.
patent: 4643529 (1987-02-01), Hosonuma et al.
patent: 4645714 (1987-02-01), Roche et al.
patent: 4666263 (1987-05-01), Petcavich
patent: 4706173 (1987-11-01), Hamada et al.
patent: 4719546 (1988-01-01), Spitz
patent: 4720426 (1988-01-01), Englert et al.
patent: 4756953 (1988-07-01), Utsumi
patent: 4796160 (1989-01-01), Kahn
patent: 4798448 (1989-01-01), van Raalte
patent: 4799772 (1989-01-01), Utsumi
patent: 4824882 (1989-04-01), Nakamura et al.
patent: 4896942 (1990-01-01), Onstott et al.
patent: 4906068 (1990-03-01), Olson et al.
patent: 4937134 (1990-06-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 5042921 (1991-08-01), Sato et al.
patent: 5056888 (1991-10-01), Messerly et al.
patent: 5059356 (1991-10-01), Nakamura et al.
patent: 5089318 (1992-02-01), Shetty et al.
patent: 5094788 (1992-03-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 5094793 (1992-03-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 5095210 (1992-03-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5103337 (1992-04-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 5122905 (1992-06-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5122906 (1992-06-01), Wheatley
patent: 5126880 (1992-06-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5139340 (1992-08-01), Okumura
patent: 5149578 (1992-09-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5157526 (1992-10-01), Kondo et al.
patent: 5184881 (1993-02-01), Karpen
patent: 5200843 (1993-04-01), Karasawa et al.
patent: 5202074 (1993-04-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 5217794 (1993-06-01), Schrenk
patent: 5221982 (1993-06-01), Faris
patent: 5233465 (1993-08-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5234729 (1993-08-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5235443 (1993-08-01), Barnik et al.
patent: 5262894 (1993-11-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5269995 (1993-12-01), Ramanathan et al.
patent: 5278680 (1994-01-01), Karasawa et al.
patent: 5278694 (1994-01-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5286418 (1994-02-01), Nakamura et al.
patent: 5294657 (1994-03-01), Melendy et al.
patent: 5309544 (1994-05-01), Saxe
patent: 5316703 (1994-05-01), Schrenk
patent: 5319478 (1994-06-01), Fijinfschilling et al.
patent: 5339198 (1994-08-01), Wheatley et al.
patent: 5359498 (1994-10-01), Karpen
patent: 5360659 (1994-11-01), Arends et al.
patent: 5389324 (1995-02-01), Lewis et al.
patent: 5422756 (1995-06-01), Weber
patent: 5424119 (1995-06-01), Phillips et al.
patent: 5448404 (1995-09-01), Schrenk et al.
patent: 5451449 (1995-09-01), Shetty et al.
patent: 5481445 (1996-01-01), Sitzema et al.
patent: 5486935 (1996-01-01), Kalamnash
patent: 5486949 (1996-01-01), Schr
3M Innovative Properties Company
Burtis John A.
Jensen Stephen C.
Shafer Ricky D.
LandOfFree
Light fixture having a multilayer polymeric film does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Light fixture having a multilayer polymeric film, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Light fixture having a multilayer polymeric film will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2838893